ABSTRACT
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception policy in liver transplantation is based on symptoms and clinical conditions not included in the calculated MELD score. Therefore, patients with chronic liver disease, like refractory ascites, chronic encephalopathy, recurrent cholangitis, and refractory pruritus, may benefit with extra points. The objective of this study was to establish the profile of the patients submitted to liver transplantation with MELD exceptions based on symptoms in the University Hospital Walter Cantídio, Ceara, Brazil, between the years of 2012 and 2015, analyzing donor and recipient data, with special attention to patients with refractory ascites and recurrent encephalopathy, including survival rates. The results demonstrated acceptable survival rates for MELD exception patients (78.4% in 3 years), showing that maybe this allocation criterion should be maintained, or even expanded.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease/classification , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Brazil , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation is an essential approach performed in several centers around the world. Our center lies in northeastern Brazil and has performed this procedure since 2002. In 2011, 126 liver transplants were performed at our institution. METHODS: This study is a retrospective and descriptive analysis of the data collected from the medical records of those transplants. Epidemiological and clinical aspects were considered in this evaluation. The outcome analysis considered overall survival rates within 30 days and 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS: The sample of 124 patients showed 60% of all patients came from other regions, particularly the North and Midwest regions of Brazil, which had a combined population of >30 million in 2011. The most frequent etiologies for end-stage liver disease were hepatitis C and alcoholism. The average calculated MELD (Model for end-stage liver disease) was 21.0. Patient survival curves were 88.4% after 30 days and 81.5% after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The development of effective perioperative management for this procedure resulted in improved outcomes. Our center's performance is based on a multidisciplinary approach performed by qualified personnel, careful pre- and postoperative follow-up and continuous improvement of services.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Child , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment of choice for patients with acute or chronic end-stage liver disease, irresectable primary liver tumor, and metabolic disorders. Historically, OLT has been associated with considerable blood loss and the need for transfusions. However, over the years there has been reduction is need for blood products. The aim of this article was to compare two distinct eras for perioperative blood transfusion rate among patients undergoing OLT; Era I, 200 transplantations in 188 patients, and Era II, 355 transplantations in 339 patients. The donor mean age was 33.70 (Era I) versus 35.34 (Era II). Cause of death in both eras was traumatic brain injury followed by cerebral vascular accident. Organ recipient data showed a mean age of 48.87 (Era I) versus 46.49 (Era II). During Era I patients with Child B (56.8%) prevailed, followed by Child C (35.4%) and Child A (7.8%). In Era II also patients with Child B (53.1%) prevailed, followed by Child C (39.6%) and Child A (7.3%). The prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during Era I was 9% (18) and in Era II 20% (71). The use of blood products in the perioperative period: was as follows packed red blood cells 1.76 (Era I) versus 0.57 (Era II) units; fresh frozen plasma 1.89 (Era I) versus 0.49 (Era II) units; platelets 2.16 (Era I) versus 0.28 (Era II) units; and cryoprecipitate 0.08 (Era I) versus 0.03 (Era II) units. OLT using the piggyback technique was performed with a transfusion rate below <30%, and it reduced blood loss and prevented severe hemodynamic instability.
