Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
Codas ; 36(3): e20230203, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695438

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate three-dimensional facial soft tissue dimensions, maximum bite force (MBF), and occlusal contact area in patients with DFD. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MBF and the three-dimensional facial measurements. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with skeletal Class III DFD and 20 patients with Class II DFD underwent a soft tissue evaluation using surface laser scanning, as well as MBF and occlusal contact area assessments. The DFD groups were compared with each other and with 25 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Significant morphological differences were found in the transversal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions between Class II DFD and Class III DFD. Both DFD groups presented an increased linear distance of chin height, which was strongly related with decreased MBF magnitude. The DFD groups exhibited lower MBF and occlusal contact area, with no significant differences between Class II and Class III DFD. CONCLUSION: The presence of DFD affected 3D measurements of facial soft tissue, causing variations beyond normal limits, lower MBF, and occlusal contact area in both Class II and Class III DFD patients. The vertical dimension might have influenced the lower MBF magnitude in the studied skeletal deformities.


Subject(s)
Bite Force , Cephalometry , Face , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Humans , Female , Male , Face/physiopathology , Face/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Adolescent , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/physiopathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/physiopathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies
2.
Codas ; 35(2): e20220026, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37098940

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) protocol has been validated and used in clinical practice and research. The goals of this study were to develop, analyze and improve a version of OMES for the Web and to investigate the relationship between the usability judgments and the prior experience of the evaluators and whether using the interface promotes learning, as shown by the task completion time (TCT). METHODS: Study steps: 1) inspection of the prototype by the team; 2) evaluation of usability by three experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs); and 3) evaluation of its usability by 12 SLPs with varying levels of experience in the use of OMES. Participants answered the Heuristic evaluation (HE), the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ), and expressed free comments. The TCT was recorded. RESULTS: The OMES-Web reached excellent usability levels, and the participants were highly satisfied. The correlations between the participants' experience and the HE and CSUQ scores were not significant. The TCT decreased significantly throughout the tasks. CONCLUSION: OMES-Web meets the usability criteria, and participants feel satisfied with the system regardless of their level of experience. The fact that it is easy to learn favors its adoption by professionals.


Subject(s)
Learning , Movement Disorders , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
3.
CoDAS ; 35(2): e20220026, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1430234

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose The Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) protocol has been validated and used in clinical practice and research. The goals of this study were to develop, analyze and improve a version of OMES for the Web and to investigate the relationship between the usability judgments and the prior experience of the evaluators and whether using the interface promotes learning, as shown by the task completion time (TCT). Methods Study steps: 1) inspection of the prototype by the team; 2) evaluation of usability by three experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs); and 3) evaluation of its usability by 12 SLPs with varying levels of experience in the use of OMES. Participants answered the Heuristic evaluation (HE), the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ), and expressed free comments. The TCT was recorded. Results The OMES-Web reached excellent usability levels, and the participants were highly satisfied. The correlations between the participants' experience and the HE and CSUQ scores were not significant. The TCT decreased significantly throughout the tasks. Conclusion OMES-Web meets the usability criteria, and participants feel satisfied with the system regardless of their level of experience. The fact that it is easy to learn favors its adoption by professionals.


RESUMO Objetivo O Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores (AMIOFE) é validado e usado na prática clínica e pesquisas. Os objetivos deste estudo foram desenvolver, analisar e aprimorar a versão do AMIOFE para a Web e investigar a relação entre os julgamentos de usabilidade e a prévia experiência dos avaliadores, e se o manuseio da interface promove o aprendizado, baseado no tempo para completar a tarefa (TCT). Método Passos do estudo: 1) inspeção do protótipo pela equipe; 2) avaliação de usabilidade por três fonoaudiólogos experientes; e 3) avaliação de usabilidade por 12 fonoaudiólogos com variados níveis de experiência no uso do AMIOFE. Avaliação heurística (HE), Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) e livre expressão dos participantes foram realizadas. O TCT foi registrado. Resultados O AMIOFE-Web atingiu ótimos níveis de usabilidade e os participantes mostram-se altamente satisfeitos (Escala geral do CSUQ; Média= 1,31, DP= 0,31). A relação da experiência dos participantes e a HE e o CSUQ não foi significativa. O TCT decresceu significantemente ao longo das tarefas, mostrando que o sistema é fácil de aprender e usar. Conclusão O AMIOFE-Web atende os critérios de usabilidade e os participantes sentiram-se satisfeitos com o sistema, independentemente de seus níveis de experiência. O fato de ser de fácil aprendizado é um fator favorável para a sua adoção por profissionais.

4.
Codas ; 33(2): e20190219, 2021.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34008774

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Adapt and validate the content and appearance of the Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E) for nursing infants aged 6 to 24 months. METHODS: This is a validation study. The parameters were based on the literature on orofacial motor development, the authors' experience, and on a committee of ten members. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, content validity index, and agreement among experts. RESULTS: The protocol was organized into functional blocks after maintenance, exclusion, modification, and addition of items, and was adapted according to the age group. A high level of agreement between experts was obtained for 90% of the items. The final version of the protocol includes new items such as history of feeding, orofacial parafunctional habits, facial mobility, dentition, oral breathing mode, swallowing of pasty food, and details specific for the age group. An operational manual and a table for recording the scores were also included. CONCLUSIONS: The OMES-E Infants protocol was validated for its content and appearance, and may contribute to orofacial myofunctional diagnosis in the 6 to 24-month age group.


OBJETIVO: Adaptar e validar conteúdo e aparência do Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores Expandido (AMIOFE-E) para lactentes de 6 a 24 meses de idade. MÉTODO: Estudo de validação. Os parâmetros foram baseados em literatura sobre desenvolvimento motor orofacial, experiência dos autores e painel de 10 especialistas. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva, Índice de Validade de Conteúdo e concordância entre especialistas. RESULTADOS: O protocolo foi organizado em blocos funcionais após manutenção, exclusão, modificação e acréscimo de itens, adaptando-se à faixa etária. Obteve-se alto nível de concordância em 90% dos itens. Na versão final foram acrescidos: histórico de alimentação e hábitos parafuncionais orofaciais, mobilidade facial, dentição, modo oral de respiração, deglutição de pastoso e detalhamentos específicos para a faixa etária. Acrescentou-se um manual operacional e uma tabela para registro de escores. CONCLUSÃO: O Protocolo AMIOFE-E Lactentes e respectivo manual operacional foram validados quanto ao conteúdo e aparência, e poderá contribuir no diagnóstico miofuncional orofacial na faixa etária de 6 a 24 meses de idade.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Facial Muscles , Child, Preschool , Deglutition , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Face , Humans , Infant , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Codas ; 32(5): e20190045, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174985

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine reference values of orofacial myofunctional condition and orofacial forces in healthy young and adults. METHODS: Fifty young and adults were selected from a total of 316 voluntaries. Participants were assessed with the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) for the investigation of orofacial myofunctional condition. The maximum forces of bite, cheeks, tongue (anterior and posterior regions), and lips were assessed with an electronic dynamometer (values expressed in Newtons). Force values were obtained by average of three repeated measurement. The technical error of measurements was calculated for all variables. RESULTS: There were no differences in orofacial myofunctional condition between men and women. Men presented higher values of orofacial forces compared to women. CONCLUSION: The normal values of orofacial myofunctional condition and orofacial forces were determined in healthy and adults Brazilian men and women. The values obtained in this study from healthy Brazilian may help in the diagnosis of alterations in orofacial motor function and contribute for their therapeutic management.


Subject(s)
Lip , Tongue , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values
6.
Codas ; 29(6): e20170042, 2017 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29211113

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop a comprehensive assessment protocol for identifying, classifying and grading changes in stomatognathic system components and functions of older people, to determine its psychometric properties and verify its association with oral health and age. METHODS: The content validity of the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores for Elders protocol (OMES-Elders) was established based on the literature. The protocol contains three domains: appearance/posture, mobility, and functions of the stomatognathic system. Eighty-two healthy elder volunteers (mean age 69±7.24 years) were evaluated using the OMES-Elders. A test-screening for orofacial disorders (reference) was used to analyze the concurrent validity (correlation test), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve: ROC curve) of the OMES-Elders. The association of the OMES-Elders scores with the Oral Health Index (OHX) and age in the sample was tested. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the OMES-Elders and the reference test (p < 0.001). Reliability coefficients ranged from good (0.89) to excellent (0.99). The OMES-Elders protocol had a sensitivity of 82.9%, specificity of 83.3% and accuracy of 0.83. The scores of the protocol were significantly lower in individuals with worse oral health (OHX ≤ 61%), although individuals with adequate oral health (OHX ≥ 90%) also had myofunctional impairments. The predictors OHX and age explained, respectively, 33% and 30% of the variance in the OMES-Elders total score. CONCLUSION: As the first specific orofacial myofunctional evaluation of older people, the OMES-Elders protocol proved to be valid, reliable and its total score was associated with oral health and age.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Movement Disorders/diagnosis , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myofunctional Therapy , Oral Health , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
CoDAS ; 29(6): e20170042, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-890811

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose To develop a comprehensive assessment protocol for identifying, classifying and grading changes in stomatognathic system components and functions of older people, to determine its psychometric properties and verify its association with oral health and age. Methods The content validity of the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores for Elders protocol (OMES-Elders) was established based on the literature. The protocol contains three domains: appearance/posture, mobility, and functions of the stomatognathic system. Eighty-two healthy elder volunteers (mean age 69±7.24 years) were evaluated using the OMES-Elders. A test-screening for orofacial disorders (reference) was used to analyze the concurrent validity (correlation test), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve: ROC curve) of the OMES-Elders. The association of the OMES-Elders scores with the Oral Health Index (OHX) and age in the sample was tested. Results There was a significant correlation between the OMES-Elders and the reference test (p < 0.001). Reliability coefficients ranged from good (0.89) to excellent (0.99). The OMES-Elders protocol had a sensitivity of 82.9%, specificity of 83.3% and accuracy of 0.83. The scores of the protocol were significantly lower in individuals with worse oral health (OHX ≤ 61%), although individuals with adequate oral health (OHX ≥ 90%) also had myofunctional impairments. The predictors OHX and age explained, respectively, 33% and 30% of the variance in the OMES-Elders total score. Conclusion As the first specific orofacial myofunctional evaluation of older people, the OMES-Elders protocol proved to be valid, reliable and its total score was associated with oral health and age.


RESUMO Objetivo Desenvolver um protocolo de avaliação abrangente para identificar, classificar e graduar as mudanças nos componentes e funções do sistema estomatognático em pessoas idosas, determinar suas propriedades psicométricas e verificar a associação com a saúde oral e a idade. Método A validade de conteúdo do protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores para Idosos (AMIOFE-I), que contém três domínios, aparência/postura, mobilidade e funções do sistema estomatognático, foi estabelecida com base na literatura. Oitenta e dois voluntários idosos (média de idade 69±7,24 anos) foram avaliados usando o AMIOFE-I. Um teste de triagem de distúrbios miofuncionais (referência) foi empregado para as análises de validade concorrente (teste de correlação), sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve: curva ROC) do AMIOFE-I. Também foi analisada a associação dos escores do AMIOFE-I com o índice de saúde oral (ISO), determinado na amostra, e à idade. Resultados Houve uma significante correlação entre o AMIOFE e o teste de referência. Os coeficientes de confiabilidade variaram de bom a excelente. O AMIOFE apresentou sensibilidade de 82,9%, especificidade de 83,3% e acurácia de 0,83. Os escores do AMIOFE-I foram significantemente menores em indivíduos com piores ISO (≤ 61%), contudo aqueles com adequada saúde oral (ISO ≥ 90%) também tinha prejuízos miofuncionais. Os preditores ISO e idade explicaram respectivamente 33% e 30% da variância no escore total do AMIOFE-I. Conclusão O protocolo AMIOFE-I, o primeiro específico para a avaliação miofuncional de idosos, mostrou-se válido, confiável e seu escore total foi associado à saúde oral e à idade.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Movement Disorders/diagnosis , Psychometrics , Oral Health , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Age Factors , Myofunctional Therapy , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Middle Aged
8.
Codas ; 28(1): 17-21, 2016.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27074184

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Women are more likely to present temporomandibular disorders (TMD); however, studies comparing genders in Brazilian samples are rare. PURPOSE: To analyze the proportion of men and women, as well as the association between gender and age, problem duration, and TMD symptoms in patients admitted to an university clinic for treatment. METHODS: Interview and assessment data of protocols from 1,000 patients diagnosed with TMD were collected and analyzed and then divided into two groups, male (n = 177) and female (n = 823). The exploratory analysis was based on contingency tables and χ2 test was carried out. Subsequently, the logistic regression model was used and the odds ratios (OR) concerning the evaluated comparisons were calculated. RESULTS: Females were more prevalent in the sample, and mean ages and TMD duration were similar between the groups, with higher occurrence in young adults (19 to 40 years old). The OR values showed an association between the female gender and the signs/symptoms of pain in the temporomandibular joint, pain in the facial muscles, neck and shoulders, headache, fatigue in the muscles of mastication, otologic symptoms, and dysphonia. Women had two times higher chances of presenting these symptoms than men. CONCLUSION: In the sample of Brazilian patients with TMD, the number of women who presented a higher prevalence of painful symptoms was greater, followed by otologic symptoms and complaints of dysphonia. The prevalence of joint noise was similar in both studied groups.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Facial Pain/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Young Adult
9.
CoDAS ; 28(1): 17-21, jan.-fev. 2016. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-779119

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Introdução: Mulheres são mais susceptíveis às desordens temporomandibulares (DTM), contudo, estudos que tenham comparado os gêneros em amostras brasileiras são raros. Objetivo: Analisar a proporção de homens e mulheres, bem como a associação entre o gênero e as variáveis idade, duração do problema e sintomas de DTM em pacientes admitidos para tratamento em uma clínica universitária. Métodos: Foram coletados e analisados dados de entrevista e avaliação de mil protocolos de pacientes com diagnóstico de DTM, divididos em 2 grupos, masculino (n=177) e feminino (n=823). Foi realizada a análise exploratória a partir de tabelas de contingência e teste do χ2. Posteriormente, foi utilizado o modelo de regressão logística e calculadas as odds ratio brutas (OR) referentes às comparações avaliadas. Resultados: Na amostra prevaleceu o gênero feminino e as médias de idade e de duração da DTM foram semelhantes entre os grupos, predominando a faixa etária de adultos jovens (19 a 40 anos). Os valores de OR evidenciaram associação entre o gênero feminino e os sinais/sintomas dor na articulação temporomandibular (ATM), dor nos músculos faciais, pescoço e ombros, cefaleia, fadiga nos músculos mastigatórios, sintoma otológico e disfonia, tendo sido a chance das mulheres os apresentassem duas vezes maior do que os homens. Conclusão: Na amostra de pacientes brasileiros com DTM foi maior o número de mulheres e essas apresentaram maior prevalência de sintomas dolorosos, seguidos pelos otológicos e queixas de disfonia. A prevalência de ruído articular foi semelhante nos grupos estudados.


ABSTRACT Introduction: Women are more likely to present temporomandibular disorders (TMD); however, studies comparing genders in Brazilian samples are rare. Purpose: To analyze the proportion of men and women, as well as the association between gender and age, problem duration, and TMD symptoms in patients admitted to an university clinic for treatment. Methods: Interview and assessment data of protocols from 1,000 patients diagnosed with TMD were collected and analyzed and then divided into two groups, male (n = 177) and female (n = 823). The exploratory analysis was based on contingency tables and χ2 test was carried out. Subsequently, the logistic regression model was used and the odds ratios (OR) concerning the evaluated comparisons were calculated. Results: Females were more prevalent in the sample, and mean ages and TMD duration were similar between the groups, with higher occurrence in young adults (19 to 40 years old). The OR values showed an association between the female gender and the signs/symptoms of pain in the temporomandibular joint, pain in the facial muscles, neck and shoulders, headache, fatigue in the muscles of mastication, otologic symptoms, and dysphonia. Women had two times higher chances of presenting these symptoms than men. Conclusion: In the sample of Brazilian patients with TMD, the number of women who presented a higher prevalence of painful symptoms was greater, followed by otologic symptoms and complaints of dysphonia. The prevalence of joint noise was similar in both studied groups.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Age Factors , Brazil/epidemiology , Facial Pain/epidemiology , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology
10.
Codas ; 27(5): 478-82, 2015.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26648220

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To present the measures for tongue pressure in Brazilian young adults, considering specific tasks, and to verify the differences regarding gender and according to the tasks. METHODS: Fifty-one volunteers aged 18 to 28 years, of both genders with normal occlusion and without speech disorders were evaluated. We used the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument in the evaluation of tongue pressure (kilopascal) during specific tests of elevation, protrusion, swallowing, and lateralization, in addition to the endurance test (seconds). The analysis was conducted using analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey's multiple comparison test, adopting a 5% significance level. RESULTS: The values obtained for men and women in the tests were as follows: elevation, 63.94±12.92 and 50.27±15.29; protrusion, 60.22±13.62 and 44.30±12.95; swallowing, 33.94±12.06 and 34.27±13.25; lateralization on the right, 44.15±10.47 and 31.85±8.46; lateralization on the left, 43.15±10.22 and 29.55±8.91; and endurance test: 24.85±10.95 and 17.35±6.71, respectively. The values were higher in men compared with women for the protrusion and lateralization tasks. The measures of the protrusion and elevation tasks did not differ for men but were higher in both genders than those of the lateralization and the swallowing tests. There was no difference in lateralization according to side in both the genders. CONCLUSION: The measures for the tongue pressure in Brazilian young adults were determined by specific tasks. Gender influenced the pressure of the tongue values for the protrusion and lateralization tasks. Elevation and protrusion tasks measures were higher than those of the lateralization and swallowing tasks.


Subject(s)
Deglutition/physiology , Muscle Strength/physiology , Tongue/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Pressure , Reference Values , Sex Factors , Stomatognathic System/physiology , Young Adult
11.
CoDAS ; 27(5): 478-482, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-767906

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: Apresentar valores para a pressão da língua em adultos jovens brasileiros, considerando provas específicas e possíveis diferenças quanto ao gênero e tipo de prova. Método: Foram avaliados 51 voluntários de 18 a 28 anos, ambos os gêneros, com boa relação dento-oclusal e sem alterações de fala. Utilizou-se o Iowa Oral Performance Instrument na avaliação da pressão da língua (Kilopascal) durante as provas de elevação, protrusão, deglutição e lateralização, além do teste de resistência (segundos). Na análise dos resultados foi utilizado o ANOVA, seguido do teste de comparações múltiplas Tukey, adotando o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Os valores obtidos, respectivamente para homens e mulheres, na prova de elevação foram 63,94±12,92 e 50,27±15,29, na protrusão 60,22±13,62 e 44,30±12,95, na deglutição 33,94±12,06 e 34,27±13,25, na lateralização à direita 44,15±10,47 e 31,85±8,46, na lateralização à esquerda 43,15±10,22 e 29,55±8,91, e no teste de resistência 24,85±10,95 e 17,35±6,71. Os homens apresentaram valor maior nas provas de protrusão e de lateralização; os valores das provas de protrusão e elevação não diferiram entre si para o gênero masculino, mas foram maiores que a lateralização e a deglutição em ambos os gêneros; não houve diferença na prova de lateralização em relação ao lado em ambos os gêneros. Conclusão: Valores de pressão da língua em adultos jovens brasileiros foram determinados para provas específicas; o gênero influenciou nos valores das provas de protrusão e lateralização; os valores obtidos nas provas de elevação e protrusão foram maiores que na lateralização e deglutição.


ABSTRACT Purpose: To present the measures for tongue pressure in Brazilian young adults, considering specific tasks, and to verify the differences regarding gender and according to the tasks. Methods: Fifty-one volunteers aged 18 to 28 years, of both genders with normal occlusion and without speech disorders were evaluated. We used the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument in the evaluation of tongue pressure (kilopascal) during specific tests of elevation, protrusion, swallowing, and lateralization, in addition to the endurance test (seconds). The analysis was conducted using analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey's multiple comparison test, adopting a 5% significance level. Results: The values obtained for men and women in the tests were as follows: elevation, 63.94±12.92 and 50.27±15.29; protrusion, 60.22±13.62 and 44.30±12.95; swallowing, 33.94±12.06 and 34.27±13.25; lateralization on the right, 44.15±10.47 and 31.85±8.46; lateralization on the left, 43.15±10.22 and 29.55±8.91; and endurance test: 24.85±10.95 and 17.35±6.71, respectively. The values were higher in men compared with women for the protrusion and lateralization tasks. The measures of the protrusion and elevation tasks did not differ for men but were higher in both genders than those of the lateralization and the swallowing tests. There was no difference in lateralization according to side in both the genders. Conclusion: The measures for the tongue pressure in Brazilian young adults were determined by specific tasks. Gender influenced the pressure of the tongue values for the protrusion and lateralization tasks. Elevation and protrusion tasks measures were higher than those of the lateralization and swallowing tasks.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Deglutition/physiology , Muscle Strength/physiology , Tongue/physiology , Brazil , Pressure , Reference Values , Sex Factors , Stomatognathic System/physiology
12.
Codas ; 26(4): 322-7, 2014.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25211692

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test the usability of Computerized Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation (OMES) protocol and analyze its validity. METHODS: The study was divided into three stages: the first stage, production of the computerized version of OMES. The second stage was the validation of the user's interface, in which 100 OMES protocols of a database, filled in printed version, were transferred using the computerized instrument. Necessary changes to the system have occurred at this stage. In the third stage, usability of the OMES protocol in multimedia version, three evaluators transferred data from other 25 printed protocols from database for the computerized version, and the time to transfer the data of each protocol was computed and compared between examiners by one-way ANOVA. Moreover, these evaluators analyzed the usability of computerized protocol according to the "Ten principles of Heuristics usability" as described in the literature. RESULTS: The computerized protocol satisfied the principles of heuristics usability, according to the evaluation of the three Speech-Language Pathology evaluators, and the average time spent by the evaluators to transpose the data of each protocol to the software ranged from 3.1 ± 0.75 to 3.83 ± 0.91 minutes. CONCLUSION: The Computerized AMIOFE protocol is valid and had its usability/functionality confirmed.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Malocclusion/diagnosis , Movement Disorders/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Humans , Mastication/physiology , Movement Disorders/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , User-Computer Interface
13.
CoDAS ; 26(4): 322-327, July-Aug/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-720824

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test the usability of Computerized Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation (OMES) protocol and analyze its validity. METHODS: The study was divided into three stages: the first stage, production of the computerized version of OMES. The second stage was the validation of the user's interface, in which 100 OMES protocols of a database, filled in printed version, were transferred using the computerized instrument. Necessary changes to the system have occurred at this stage. In the third stage, usability of the OMES protocol in multimedia version, three evaluators transferred data from other 25 printed protocols from database for the computerized version, and the time to transfer the data of each protocol was computed and compared between examiners by one-way ANOVA. Moreover, these evaluators analyzed the usability of computerized protocol according to the "Ten principles of Heuristics usability" as described in the literature. RESULTS: The computerized protocol satisfied the principles of heuristics usability, according to the evaluation of the three Speech-Language Pathology evaluators, and the average time spent by the evaluators to transpose the data of each protocol to the software ranged from 3.1±0.75 to 3.83±0.91 minutes. CONCLUSION: The Computerized AMIOFE protocol is valid and had its usability/functionality confirmed. .


OBJETIVO: Testar a usabilidade do protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores (AMIOFE) Informatizado e analisar a validade do mesmo. MÉTODOS: Estudo dividido em três etapas: a primeira, produção da versão informatizada do AMIOFE. A segunda etapa consistiu na validação da interface do usuário, na qual 100 protocolos AMIOFE de um banco de dados, preenchidos em versão impressa, foram transferidos empregando o instrumento informatizado. Alterações necessárias no sistema ocorreram nessa etapa. Na terceira etapa, usabilidade da versão multimídia do protocolo AMIOFE, três avaliadoras transferiram os dados de outros 25 protocolos do banco de dados para a versão informatizada, sendo que o tempo para a transferência dos dados de cada protocolo foi computado e comparado entre os examinadores pelo teste ANOVA one-way. Além disso, essas avaliadoras analisaram a usabilidade do protocolo informatizado de acordo com os "Dez princípios de usabilidade Heurística", como descritos na literatura. RESULTADOS: O protocolo informatizado satisfez aos princípios de usabilidade heurística, de acordo com a avaliação das três avaliadoras fonoaudiólogas, e o tempo médio despendido pelas avaliadoras para a transposição dos dados de cada protocolo para o software variou de 3,1±0,75 a 3,83±0,91 minutos. CONCLUSÃO: O protocolo AMIOFE Informatizado é válido e teve sua usabilidade/funcionalidade confirmada. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Malocclusion/diagnosis , Movement Disorders/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Mastication/physiology , Movement Disorders/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , User-Computer Interface
14.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 17(2): 83-89, Mar.-Apr. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-626373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and severity of the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), the frequency of parafunctional oral habits and the correlation between the variables by means of the patients' perception regarding their problem. METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with TMD, through a clinical examination of their masticatory system, answered the questions of a previously published protocol concerning the signs and symptoms most frequently reported in the literature. RESULTS: According to the results from the non parametric statistical analysis, the frequency for the following signs and symptoms was significant: Fatigue and muscle pain, joint sounds, tinnitus, ear fullness, headache, chewing impairment and difficulty to yawn (p<0.01) and otalgia (p<0.05). As to the parafunctional oral habits, there was a significant presence of teeth clenching during the day and night (p<0.01) and teeth grinding at night (p<0.05). The variable correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between symptom frequency and severity; age was correlated with the presence of otalgia, cervical pain and teeth sensitivity, besides being correlated with muscle and joint pain severity. Habit frequency was negatively correlated with age. TMD duration was also positively correlated with the symptoms of tinnitus, ear fullness, muscle and joint pain. CONCLUSION: The study results showed that the anamnestic assessment using ProDTMMulti can predict the severity of the TMD case.

15.
Pró-fono ; 21(4): 315-319, out.-dez. 2009. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-536791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: the development of oral motor control depends partially on motor and sensory experiences. AIM: to analyze the relationship between the duration of breastfeeding, artificial feeding and sucking habits, and of these parameters with the orofacial motor performance. METHOD: participants of this study were one hundred and seventy-six children aged 6 to 12 years. All subjects were submitted to an orofacial myofunctional clinical examination, using a protocol with scores, and parents/care takers were interviewed in respect to the feeding and sucking habits of their children. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman Test. RESULTS: in the studied sample, the mean duration of breastfeeding was of 10.30 months (ranging from zero to 60 months), of artificial feeding was of 44.12 months (zero to 122 months) and of sucking habits was of 39.32 months (0 to 144 months). There was a negative correlation of breastfeeding duration with artificial feeding duration and sucking habits duration (p < 0001). The duration of the artificial feeding was positively correlated to the duration of sucking habits (p < 0001). The duration of breastfeeding was positively correlated with the mobility of the tongue and jaw (p = 0.05). There was a negative correlation of the duration of artificial feeding and the duration of sucking habits with the performance in mastication and swallowing, respectively, as well as with the duration of both types of sucking with the performance in the diadochokinesia test (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: the duration of natural breastfeeding presented a positive effect over the mobility of the orofacial structures. Deleterious effects of the prolonged duration of artificial feeding and sucking habits in the oral motor control were confirmed.


TEMA: o desenvolvimento do controle motor oral depende em parte das experiências sensoriais e motoras. OBJETIVO: analisar a relação entre a duração do aleitamento natural, artificial e da sucção e destas com o desempenho motor orofacial. MÉTODO: cento e setenta e seis crianças, de 6 a 12 anos de idade, passaram por avaliação miofuncional orofacial, empregando o protocolo com escores, e os responsáveis foram entrevistados a respeito do aleitamento e hábitos de sucção de suas crianças. As correlações foram calculadas pelo teste de Spearman. RESULTADOS: na amostra estudada, a média de duração do aleitamento natural foi de 10,30 meses (variando de zero a 60 meses), do aleitamento artificial 44,12 (zero a 122 meses) e dos hábitos de sucção de 39,32 meses (zero a 144 meses). Houve correlação negativa da duração do aleitamento natural com a duração do aleitamento artificial e a duração dos hábitos de sucção (p < 0,001). A maior duração do aleitamento artificial correspondeu à maior duração dos hábitos de sucção, apresentando, assim, correlação positiva (p < 0,001). A duração do aleitamento natural foi correlacionada positivamente com a mobilidade orofacial (p = 0,05). Houve correlação negativa da duração do aleitamento artificial e da duração dos hábitos de sucção com, respectivamente, o desempenho na mastigação e na deglutição, bem como da duração de ambos os tipos de sucção com a prova de diadococinesia (p = 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: a duração do aleitamento natural mostrou efeito positivo sobre a mobilidade das estruturas orofaciais. Os efeitos deletérios da duração dos hábitos de sucção no controle motor orofacial foram confirmados.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Bottle Feeding , Breast Feeding , Deglutition/physiology , Mastication/physiology , Sucking Behavior/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
16.
Pro Fono ; 21(3): 189-94, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19838563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: identification of the mandibular movement range is an important procedure in the evaluation of the stomatognathic system. However, there are few studies in children that focus on normal parameters or abnormalities. AIM: to determine the average range of mandibular movements in Brazilian children aged 6 to 12 years; to verify the difference between genders, in each age group, and between the different age groups: 6-8 years; 8.1-10 years; and 10.1-12 years. METHOD: participants of the study were 240 healthy children selected among regular students from local schools of São Paulo State. The maximum mandibular opening, lateral excursion and protrusive movements, and deviation of the medium line, if present, were measured using a digital caliper. Student T test, Analysis of variance and Tukey test were considered significant for p < 0.05. RESULTS: the mean values observed in the studied sample were: 44.51mm for maximum mandibular opening; 7.71mm for lateral excursion to the right; 7.92mm for lateral excursion to the left; 7.45mm for protrusive movements. No statistical difference was observed between genders. There was a gradual increase in the range of mandibular movements, with significant differences mainly between the ages of 6-8 years and 10.1-12 years. CONCLUSION: during childhood the range of mandibular movements increases. Age should be considered in this analysis for a greater precision in the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Mandible/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Brazil , Child , Female , Humans , Male
17.
Pró-fono ; 21(3): 189-194, jul.-set. 2009. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-528505

ABSTRACT

TEMA: a determinação dos limites de movimentos mandibulares é um importante procedimento na avaliação do estado funcional do sistema estomatognático, porém poucos são os estudos que focalizam os parâmetros de normalidade ou desvios em crianças. Objetivos: definir as médias dos limites de movimentos mandibulares em crianças brasileiras de 6 a 12 anos de idade; verificar diferenças entre os gêneros, em cada faixa etária, e entre as faixas etária de 6 a 8 anos, 8:1 a 10 anos e 10:1 a 12 anos de idade. MÉTODO: participaram 240 crianças, escolares do interior do Estado de São Paulo. Com o auxílio de um paquímetro digital foram mensuradas a máxima abertura mandibular, a protrusão, a excursão lateral direita e esquerda e o desvio da linha média, quando presente. O teste T Student, a Análise de variância e o pós-teste Tukey foram considerados significantes para p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: as médias das medidas da amostra foram: máxima abertura mandibular 44,51 mm, excursão lateral direita 7,71mm, excursão lateral esquerda 7,92 mm e a protrusão 7,45 mm. Não houve diferença estatística entre os gêneros. Houve aumento gradual nos limites dos movimentos mandibulares com o aumento da faixa etária, com diferenças significantes principalmente entre as faixas etárias de 6 - 8 anos e 10:1-12 anos. CONCLUSÃO: durante a infância os limites de movimentos mandibulares aumentam e a idade deve ser considerada na análise desses dados para maior precisão no diagnóstico.


BACKGROUND: identification of the mandibular movement range is an important procedure in the evaluation of the stomatognathic system. However, there are few studies in children that focus on normal parameters or abnormalities. AIM: to determine the average range of mandibular movements in Brazilian children aged 6 to 12 years; to verify the difference between genders, in each age group, and between the different age groups: 6-8 years; 8.1-10 years; and 10.1-12 years. METHOD: participants of the study were 240 healthy children selected among regular students from local schools of São Paulo State. The maximum mandibular opening, lateral excursion and protrusive movements, and deviation of the medium line, if present, were measured using a digital caliper. Student T test, Analysis of variance and Tukey test were considered significant for p < 0.05. RESULTS: the mean values observed in the studied sample were: 44.51mm for maximum mandibular opening; 7.71mm for lateral excursion to the right; 7.92mm for lateral excursion to the left; 7.45mm for protrusive movements. No statistical difference was observed between genders. There was a gradual increase in the range of mandibular movements, with significant differences mainly between the ages of 6-8 years and 10.1-12 years. Conclusion: during childhood the range of mandibular movements increases. Age should be considered in this analysis for a greater precision in the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Brazil
18.
Pro Fono ; 21(1): 39-45, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19360257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information regarding the relationship between age, speech rate and speech performance. AIM: To analyze and to compare the performance of children according to age, Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) and speech rate, and to determine the relationship between these variables. METHOD: Participants of this study were two hundred children divided in three different age groups: 6:0 to 8:0 years (Group I), 8:1 to 10:0 years (Group II), and 10:1 to 12:6 years (Group III). The following tests were used: speech rate tasks, imitation and picture naming (ABFW-Language test for children) and the Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA for inter-group analysis, followed by the Tukey Test. The coefficient of Pearson Correlation was used to analyze the relationship between age, speech rate and speech performance (PCC). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the PCC and speech rate when comparing the three groups (p<0.001). Regarding speech rate test, using /pataka/ as a stimulus, there were significant differences between Group I and the two other groups (p<0.01). There was a significant and positive correlation between age, the PCC and speech rate (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Speech performance, measured by the PCC, and speech rate increased according to age, resulting in significant differences between the three age groups. The increase of the PCC indexes and of speech rate were directly proportional.


Subject(s)
Language Development , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech Production Measurement , Speech/physiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Skills/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Time Factors
19.
Pró-fono ; 21(1): 39-44, jan.-mar. 2009. graf, tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-511008

ABSTRACT

TEMA: faltam informações a respeito da relação entre idade, velocidade de fala e desempenho na fala. OBJETIVO: analisar e comparar o desempenho de crianças, de acordo com a faixa etária, quanto ao índice de porcentagem de consoantes corretas (PCC) e medidas de velocidade de fala, bem como determinar a relação entre essas variáveis. MÉTODO: os participantes deste estudo foram duzentas crianças agrupadas em três faixas etárias: 6:0 a 8:0 anos (Grupo I), 8:1 a 10:0 anos (Grupo II); 10:1 a 12:6 anos (Grupo III). Foram aplicados testes de velocidade de fala, de nomeação de figuras e imitação de vocábulos (ABFW - Teste de Linguagem Infantil) e calculados os índices porcentagem de consoantes corretas (PCC). A análise de variância (ANOVA) foi utilizada para a comparação do desempenho dos grupos, seguida pelo teste de Tukey. Para analisar a relação entre idade, velocidade de fala e PCC foi utilizado o teste de correlação de Pearson. RESULTADOS: houve diferença significante entre os três grupos quanto ao PCC e a velocidade de fala (p < 0,001). De acordo com o teste de velocidade de fala usando o estímulo /pataka/, houve diferenças significantes entre o grupo I e os outros dois grupos (p < 0,01). Houve correlação positiva e significante entre idade, desempenho nas tarefas de PCC e velocidade de fala (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: o desempenho na fala, medido pelo PCC, e a velocidade de fala aumentaram de acordo com a faixa etária, resultando em diferenças significantes entre os grupos. O aumento do PCC e da velocidade de fala foram diretamente proporcionais


BACKGROUND: there is a lack of information regarding the relationship between age, speech rate and speech performance. AIM: to analyze and to compare the performance of children according to age, Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) and speech rate, and to determine the relationship between these variables. METHOD: participants of this study were two hundred children divided in three different age groups: 6:0 to 8:0 years (Group I), 8:1 to 10:0 years (Group II), and 10:1 to 12:6 years (Group III). The following tests were used: speech rate tasks, imitation and picture naming (ABFW - Language test for children) and the Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA for inter-group analysis, followed by the Tukey Test. The coefficient of Pearson Correlation was used to analyze the relationship between age, speech rate and speech performance (PCC). RESULTS: there was a significant difference between the PCC and speech rate when comparing the three groups (p<0.001). Regarding speech rate test, using /pataka/ as a stimulus, there were significant differences between Group I and the two other groups (p<0.01). There was a significant and positive correlation between age, the PCC and speech rate (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: speech performance, measured by the PCC, and speech rate increased according to age, resulting in significant differences between the three age groups. The increase of the PCC indexes and of speech rate were directly proportional


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Language Development , Speech Production Measurement , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech/physiology , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Motor Skills/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Time Factors
20.
Pro Fono ; 21(4): 315-9, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20098950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The development of oral motor control depends partially on motor and sensory experiences. AIM: To analyze the relationship between the duration of breastfeeding, artificial feeding and sucking habits, and of these parameters with the orofacial motor performance. METHOD: Participants of this study were one hundred and seventy-six children aged 6 to 12 years. All subjects were submitted to an orofacial myofunctional clinical examination, using a protocol with scores, and parents/care takers were interviewed in respect to the feeding and sucking habits of their children. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman Test. RESULTS: In the studied sample, the mean duration of breastfeeding was of 10.30 months (ranging from zero to 60 months), of artificial feeding was of 44.12 months (zero to 122 months) and of sucking habits was of 39.32 months (0 to 144 months). There was a negative correlation of breastfeeding duration with artificial feeding duration and sucking habits duration (p < 0001). The duration of the artificial feeding was positively correlated to the duration of sucking habits (p < 0001). The duration of breastfeeding was positively correlated with the mobility of the tongue and jaw (p = 0.05). There was a negative correlation of the duration of artificial feeding and the duration of sucking habits with the performance in mastication and swallowing, respectively, as well as with the duration of both types of sucking with the performance in the diadochokinesia test (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The duration of natural breastfeeding presented a positive effect over the mobility of the orofacial structures. Deleterious effects of the prolonged duration of artificial feeding and sucking habits in the oral motor control were confirmed.


Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding , Breast Feeding , Deglutition/physiology , Mastication/physiology , Sucking Behavior/physiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...