Prediction of diagnosis and diastolic filling pressure by AI-enhanced cardiac MRI: a modelling study of hospital data.

BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of patients and novel drugs for distinct causes of systolic and diastolic heart failure, automated assessment of cardiac function is important. We aimed to provide a non-invasive method to predict diagnosis of patients undergoing cardiac MRI (cMRI) and to obtain left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). METHODS: For this modelling study, patients who had undergone cardiac catheterisation at University Hospital Heidelberg (Heidelberg, Germany) between July 15, 2004 and March 16, 2023, were identified, as were individual left ventricular pressure measurements. We used existing patient data from routine cardiac diagnostics. From this initial group, we extracted patients who had been diagnosed with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or amyloidosis, as well as control individuals with no structural phenotype. Data were pseudonymised and only processed within the university hospital's AI infrastructure. We used the data to build different models to predict either demographic (ie, AI-age and AI-sex), diagnostic (ie, AI-coronary artery disease and AI-cardiomyopathy [AI-CMP]), or functional parameters (ie, AI-LVEDP). We randomly divided our datasets via computer into training, validation, and test datasets. AI-CMP was not compared with other models, but was validated in a prospective setting. Benchmarking was also done. FINDINGS: 66 936 patients who had undergone cardiac catheterisation at University Hospital Heidelberg were identified, with more than 183 772 individual left ventricular pressure measurements. We extracted 4390 patients from this initial group, of whom 1131 (25·8%) had been diagnosed with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 1064 (24·2%) had been diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, 816 (18·6%) had been diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 202 (4·6%) had been diagnosed with amyloidosis, and 1177 (26·7%) were control individuals with no structural phenotype. The core cohort only included patients with cardiac catherisation and cMRI within 30 days, and emergency cases were excluded. AI-sex was able to predict patient sex with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0·78 (95% CI 0·77-0·78) and AI-age was able to predict patient age with a mean absolute error of 7·86 years (7·77-7·95), with a Pearson correlation of 0·57 (95% CI 0·56-0·57). The AUCs for the classification tasks ranged between 0·82 (95% CI 0·79-0·84) for ischaemic cardiomyopathy and 0·92 (0·91-0·94) for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. INTERPRETATION: Our AI models could be easily integrated into clinical practice and provide added value to the information content of cMRI, allowing for disease classification and prediction of diastolic function. FUNDING: Informatics for Life initiative of the Klaus-Tschira Foundation, German Center for Cardiovascular Research, eCardiology section of the German Cardiac Society, and AI Health Innovation Cluster Heidelberg.

Long-Term Mortality after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair Significantly Decreased over the Last Decade: Comparison between Initial and Current Experience from the MiTra Ulm Registry.

(1) Objective: We aimed to assess whether the candidate profile, the long-term outcomes and the predictors for long-term mortality after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) have changed over the last decade; (2) Methods: Long-term follow-up data (median time of 1202 days) including mortality, MACCE and functional status were available for 677 consecutive patients enrolled in the prospective MiTra Ulm registry from January 2010 to April 2019. The initial 340 patients treated in our institution before January 2016 were compared with the following 337 patients; (3) Results: Patients treated after 2016 showed significantly less ventricular dilatation (left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 43 ± 13 mm vs. 49 ± 16 mm, p < 0.007), lower systolic pulmonary pressures (50 ± 15 mmHg vs. 57 ± 21 mmHg, p = 0.01) and a lower prevalence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (27.2% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.001) at baseline than patients treated before 2016. Compared to the cohort treated before 2016, patients treated afterwards showed a significantly lower all-cause 3-year mortality (29.4% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.001) and lower MACCE (38.6% vs. 54.1%, p < 0.001), without differences for MR etiology. While severe tricuspid regurgitation and NYHA class IV remained independently associated with an increased long-term mortality over the last decade, severe left ventricular dilatation (hazard ratio, HR 2.12, p = 0.047) and severe pulmonary hypertension (HR 2.18, p = 0.047) were predictors of long-term mortality only in patients treated before 2016. (4) Conclusions: The M-TEER candidates are currently treated earlier in the course of disease and benefit significantly in terms of a better long-term survival than patients treated at the beginning of the M-TEER era.

Deferral of non-emergency cardiac interventions is associated with increased emergency hospitalizations up to 24 months post-procedure.

BACKGROUND: Patients, whose non-emergency cardiac procedure was postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown signs of disease progression in the short term. Data on the long-term effects are currently lacking. AIM: To assess outcomes through 3 years following deferral. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center analysis includes consecutive patients whose non-emergency cardiovascular intervention was postponed during the first COVID-19-related lockdown (March 19 to April 30, 2020). Outcomes over 36 months post-procedure were analyzed and compared to a seasonal control group undergoing non-emergency intervention in 2019 as scheduled (n = 214). The primary endpoint was a composite of emergency cardiovascular hospitalization and death. Additionally, NT-proBNP levels were analyzed. RESULTS: The combined endpoint occurred in 60 of 178 patients (33.7%) whose non-emergency transcatheter heart valve intervention, rhythmological procedure, or left heart catheterization was postponed. Primary endpoint events did not occur more frequently in the study group during the 36-month follow-up (p = 0.402), but within the first 24 months post-procedure (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.60, p = 0.003). Deferred patients affected by an event in the postprocedural 24 months had significantly higher NT-proBNP levels at the time of intervention (p < 0.001) (AUC 0.768, p = 0.003, optimum cut-off 808.5 pg/ml, sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 65.8%) and thereafter (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Deferral of non-emergency cardiovascular interventions is associated with poor outcomes up to 24 months post-procedure. Adverse effects affect patients who develop signs of acute heart failure, as indicated by NT-proBNP, prior to treatment. These findings could help improve resource allocation in times of limited capacity.

Valve unit instead of intensive or intermediate care unit admission following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is safe and reduces postprocedural complications.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) is often performed in general anesthesia, and postprocedural monitoring is usually warranted on an intensive or intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC). We evaluated the implications of a dedicated valve unit (VU) instead of an ICU/IMC for monitoring after M-TEER. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 624 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 312 patients were primarily transferred to either ICU or IMC following M-TEER, and 312 patients were scheduled for the VU in the absence of indications for ICU/IMC treatment. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in VU patients (median 6.0 days (interquartile range (IQR) 5.0 - 8.0) vs. 7.0 days (IQR 6.0 - 10.0), p < 0.001) and their risk for infections (2.9 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.008) and delirium (0.6 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.056) was substantially lower compared to ICU/IMC patients. In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (0.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.41). Fifty patients (16.0%) in the VU group had to cross over to unplanned ICU/IMC admission. The most frequent indication was prolonged need for catecholamines (52.0%). Patients with ICU/IMC crossover had more advanced stages of heart failure (LV-EF < 30% in 36.0 vs. 16.0%, p = 0.001; severe concomitant tricuspid regurgitation in 48.0 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.005) and an LV-EF < 30% was independently associated with unplanned ICU/IMC admission. CONCLUSIONS: Following M-TEER postprocedural monitoring on a VU instead of an ICU/IMC is safe, reduces complications, and spares ICU capacities. Patients with advanced heart failure have a higher risk for unplanned ICU/IMC treatment after M-TEER.

The effect of a smaller spacer in the PASCAL Ace on residual mitral valve orifice area.

BACKGROUND: Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an established treatment for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) associated with a risk of creating iatrogenic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of the P10 and its larger spacer compared to the narrower Ace and its smaller spacer on reduction of mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) during M-TEER. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing M-TEER for treatment of severe FMR were screened retrospectively. Patients with a single PASCAL device implantation within the central segments of the MV leaflets, non-complex anatomy, and baseline MVOA ≥ 3.5cm2 were selected. Intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography was used to compare MVOA reduction with 3D multiplanar reconstruction and direct planimetry. Device selection did not follow a prespecified MVOA threshold. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (81.0 years, IQR {74.3-85.0}) were included. In 32 patients, the P10 was implanted (44.4%). MR severity (p = 0.66), MR reduction (p = 0.73), and body surface area (p = 0.56) were comparable. Baseline MVOA tended to be smaller in P10 patients with the larger spacer (5.0 ± 1.1 vs. 5.4 ± 1.3cm2, p = 0.18), however, residual MVOA was larger in these patients (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6cm2, p = 0.03). Accordingly, relative MVOA reduction was significantly less in P10 patients (- 45.9 ± 7.6 vs. - 56.3 ± 7.0%, p < 0.01). Indirect annuloplasty was more pronounced in Ace patients whereas mean transmitral gradients were similar. CONCLUSION: In FMR patients with non-complex anatomy, the larger spacer of the P10 maintains greater MVOA with similar MR reduction. Hence, the use of the PASCAL Ace device in patients with small MVOAs might correlate with a risk of both clinically relevant orifice reduction and even iatrogenic stenosis.

Predictors of Improvement in Concomitant Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for mitral regurgitation (MR) occurs frequently; however factors determining the post-procedural course of TR are not well understood. We investigated the parameters associated with TR improvement after M-TEER. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were consecutively included in this retrospective analysis. MR and TR severity as well as heart chamber metrics were assessed before the procedure and at follow-up. Device success was achieved in 97.3% of patients. TR decreased in 30.2% of patients. Patients with improved TR were more often female, had more severe TR at baseline, and their right heart dimensions at baseline trended to be smaller. Female sex (odds ratio (OR) 2.997), baseline MR-Grade (OR 3.181) and baseline TR-Grade (OR 2.653) independently predicted TR reduction. More pronounced right heart reverse remodeling was observed in patients with improved TR. TR regression independently predicted lower mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.333, 95% confidence interval 0.112-0.996, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in concomitant TR severity after M-TEER occurred mainly in females and in patients with high-grade TR and MR at baseline. TR regression is associated with better survival after M-TEER.

Drug-coated balloon: an effective alternative to stent strategy in small-vessel coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis.

Background: Small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequently observed in coronary angiography and linked to a higher risk of lesion failure and restenosis. Currently, treatment of small vessels is not standardized while having drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as possible strategies. We aimed to conduct a meta-analytic approach to assess the effectiveness of treatment strategies and outcomes for small-vessel CAD. Methods: Comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting treatment strategies of small-vessel CAD with a reference diameter of ≤3.0 mm. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion thrombosis, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as clinical outcomes. Outcomes from single-arm and randomized studies based on measures by means of their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were compared using a meta-analytic approach. Statistical significance was assumed if CIs did not overlap. Results: Thirty-seven eligible studies with a total of 31,835 patients with small-vessel CAD were included in the present analysis. Among those, 28,147 patients were treated with DES (24 studies) and 3,299 patients with DCB (18 studies). Common baseline characteristics were equally distributed in the different studies. TLR rate was 4% in both treatment strategies [0.04; 95% CI 0.03-0.05 (DES) vs. 0.03-0.07 (DCB)]. MI occurred in 3% of patients receiving DES and in 2% treated with DCB [0.03 (0.02-0.04) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.03)]. All-cause mortality was 3% in the DES group [0.03 (0.02-0.05)] compared with 1% in the DCB group [0.01 (0.00-0.03)]. Approximately 9% of patients with DES developed MACE vs. 4% of patients with DCB [0.09 (0.07-0.10) vs. 0.04 (0.02-0.08)]. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant impact of reference vessel diameter on outcomes. Conclusion: This large meta-analytic approach demonstrates similar clinical and angiographic results between treatment strategies with DES and DCB in small-vessel CAD. Therefore, DES may be waived in small coronary arteries when PCI is performed with DCB.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge-repair of functional mitral regurgitation induces significant remodeling of mitral annular geometry.

Background: Mitral annular alterations in the context of heart failure often lead to severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), which should be treated with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) according to current guidelines. M-TEER's effects on mitral valve (MV) annular remodeling have not been well elucidated. Methods: 141 consecutive patients undergoing M-TEER for treatment of FMR were included in this investigation. Comprehensive intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess the acute effects of M-TEER on annular geometry. Results: Average patient age was 76.2 ± 9.6 years and 46.1% were female patients. LV ejection fraction was reduced (37.0% ± 13.7%) and all patients had mitral regurgitation (MR) grade ≥III. M-TEER achieved optimal MR reduction (MR ≤ I) in 78.6% of patients. Mitral annular anterior-posterior diameters (A-Pd) were reduced by -6.2% ± 9.5% on average, whereas anterolateral-posteromedial diameters increased (3.7% ± 8.9%). Overall, a reduction in MV annular areas was observed (2D: -1.8% ± 13.1%; 3D: -2.7% ± 13.7%), which strongly correlated with A-Pd reduction (2D: r = 0.6, p < 0.01; 3D: r = 0.65, p < 0.01). Patients that achieved A-Pd reduction above the median (≥6.3%) showed significantly lower rates of the composite endpoint rehospitalization for heart failure or all-cause mortality than those with less A-Pd reduction (9.9% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.037, log-rank p = 0.039). Furthermore, patients reaching the composite endpoint had an increase in annular area (2D: 3.0% ± 15.4%; 3D: 1.9% ± 15.3%), whereas those not reaching the endpoint showed a decrease (2D: -2.7% ± 12.4%; 3D: -3.6% ± 13.3%), although residual MR after M-TEER was similar between these groups (p = 0.57). In multivariate Cox regression adjusted for baseline MR, A-Pd reduction ≥6.3% remained a significant predictor of the combined endpoint (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.85, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that effects of M-TEER in FMR are not limited to MR reduction, but also have significant impact on annular geometry. Moreover, A-Pd reduction, which mediates annular remodeling, has a significant impact on clinical outcome independent of residual MR.

TRI-SCORE is superior to EuroSCORE II and STS-Score in mortality prediction following transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair.

BACKGROUND: The development of transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair for tricuspid regurgitation is a therapeutic milestone but a specific periprocedural risk assessment tool is lacking. TRI-SCORE has recently been introduced as a dedicated risk score for tricuspid valve surgery. AIMS: This study analyzes the predictive performance of TRI-SCORE following transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair. METHODS: 180 patients who underwent transcatheter tricuspid valve repair at Ulm University Hospital were consecutively included and stratified into three TRI-SCORE risk groups. The predictive performance of TRI-SCORE was assessed throughout a follow-up period of 30 days and up to 1 year. RESULTS: All patients had severe tricuspid regurgitation. Median EuroSCORE II was 6.4% (IQR 3.8-10.1%), median STS-Score 8.1% (IQR 4.6-13.4%) and median TRI-SCORE 6.0 (IQR 4.0-7.0). 64 patients (35.6%) were in the low TRI-SCORE group, 91 (50.6%) in the intermediate and 25 (13.9%) in the high-risk groups. The procedural success rate was 97.8%. 30-day mortality was 0% in the low-risk group, 1.3% in the intermediate-risk and 17.4% in the high-risk groups (p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 168 days mortality was 0%, 3.8% and 52.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). The predictive performance of TRI-SCORE was excellent (AUC for 30-day mortality: 90.3%, for one-year mortality: 93.1%) and superior to EuroSCORE II (AUC 56.6% and 64.4%, respectively) and STS-Score (AUC 61.0% and 59.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: TRI-SCORE is a valuable tool for prediction of mortality after transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair and its performance is superior to EuroSCORE II and STS-Score. In a monocentric cohort of 180 patients undergoing edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair TRI-SCORE predicted 30-day and up to one-year mortality more reliably than EuroSCORE II and STS-Score. AUC area under the curve, 95% CI 95% confidence interval.

Predictors of worse outcome after postponing non-emergency cardiac interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Deferral of non-emergency cardiac procedures is associated with increased early emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation. This study aimed to identify predictors of worse clinical outcome after deferral of non-emergency cardiovascular interventions. METHODS: This observational case-control study included consecutive patients whose non-emergency cardiac intervention has been postponed during COVID-19-related lockdown between 19 March and 30 April 2020 (n=193). Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of the combined 1-year end point emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation and death. All patients undergoing non-emergency interventions in the corresponding time period 2019 served as control group (n=216). RESULTS: The combined end point of death and emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation occurred in 70 (36.3%) of 193 patients with a postponed cardiovascular intervention. The planned intervention was deferred by a median of 23 (19-36) days. Arterial hypertension (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.00 to 5.12; p=0.049), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.49; p=0.041) as well as severe valvular heart disease (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.68 to 5.64; p<0.001) were independent predictors of death or emergency hospitalisation. Kaplan-Maier estimators of the combined end point were 31% in patients with arterial hypertension, 56% in patients with severe valvular heart disease and 77% with both risk factors (HR 12.4, 95% CI 3.8 to 40.7; p<0.001) and only 9% in patients without these risk factors (log rank p<0.001). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) cut-point of ≥1109 pg/mL best predicts the occurrence of primary end point event in deferred patients (area under the curve 0.71; p<0.001; sensitivity 63.8%, specificity 69.4%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients with either arterial hypertension, chronic kidney or severe valvular heart disease are at very high risk for emergency hospitalisation and increased mortality in case of postponed cardiac interventions even in supposed stable clinical status. Risk seems to be even higher in patients suffering from a combination of these conditions. If the ongoing or future pandemics force hospitals again to postpone cardiac interventions, the biomarker NT-proBNP is an applicable parameter for outpatient monitoring to identify those at risk for adverse cardiovascular events.

Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair-A Decade Experience in 1000+ Patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus worsens outcomes in patients suffering from heart disease undergoing cardiac procedures. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of diabetes in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). METHODS: 1118 patients treated with M-TEER for functional (FMR) and degenerative (DMR) mitral regurgitation (MR) between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed using the combined endpoint of death/rehospitalization for heart failure (HFH). RESULTS: Among diabetics (N = 306; 27.4%), comorbidities such as coronary artery disease (75.2% vs. 62.7%; p < 0.001) and progressed (stage III/IV) chronic kidney disease (79.5% vs. 72.6%; p = 0.018) were more frequent. The rate of FMR was higher in diabetics (71.9% vs. 64.5%; p < 0.001). The combined endpoint occurred more frequently in diabetics (40.2% vs. 35.6%; log-rank = 0.035). While no difference was observed in FMR patients (36.8% vs. 37.6%; log-rank p = 0.710), rates of the combined endpoint differed significantly between diabetics and non-diabetics in DMR patients (48.8% vs. 31.9%; log-rank p = 0.001) only. However, diabetes did neither predict the combined endpoint in the overall (OR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.65-1.45; p = 0.890) nor in the DMR cohort (OR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.35-1.51; p = 0.389). Among diabetics treated with M-TEER, troponin (OR: 2.32; 95% CI 1.3-3.7; p = 0.002) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.3-0.88; p = 0.018) independently predicted the combined endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes after M-TEER, particularly in DMR patients. However, diabetes does not predict the combined endpoint. In diabetics undergoing M-TEER, biochemical markers associated with organ function and damage independently predict the combined endpoint of death and rehospitalization.

Deferral of Non-Emergency Cardiovascular Interventions Triggers Increased Cardiac Emergency Admissions-Analysis of the COVID-19 Related Lockdown.

BACKGROUND: Data on the relation between non-emergency and emergency cardiac admission rates during the COVID-19 lockdown and post-lockdown period are sparse. METHODS: Consecutive cardiac patients admitted to our tertiary heart center between 1 January and 30 June 2020 were included. The observation period of 6 months was analyzed in total and divided into three defined time periods: the pre-lockdown (1 January-19 March), lockdown (20 March-19 April), and post-lockdown (20 April-30 June) period. These were compared to the reference periods 2019 and 2022 using daily admission rates and incidence rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS: Over the observation period from 1 January to 30 June, cardiac admissions (including non-emergency and emergency) were comparable between 2019, 2020, and 2022 (n = 2889, n = 2952, n = 2956; p = 0.845). However, when compared to the reference period 2019, non-emergency admissions decreased in 2020 (1364 vs. 1663; p = 0.02), while emergency admissions significantly increased (1588 vs. 1226; p < 0.001). Further analysis of the lockdown period revealed that non-emergency admissions dropped by 82% (IRR 0.18; 95%-CI 0.14-0.24; p < 0.001) and 42% fewer invasive cardiac interventions were performed (p < 0.001), whereas the post-lockdown period showed a 52% increase of emergency admissions (IRR 1.47; 95%-CI 1.31-1.65; p < 0.001) compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a drastic surge of emergency cardiac admissions post-COVID-19 related lockdown suggesting that patients who did not keep their non-emergency appointment had to be admitted as an emergency later on.

Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Using MitraClip or PASCAL: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 2003, Abbott's MitraClip (MC) has become the most established catheter-based treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). Recent approval of Edwards Lifescience's PASCAL device has extended the field of TEER. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare the PASCAL and MC regarding procedural results and short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). METHODS: Data from 3 high-volume centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was residual MR at discharge. Secondary endpoints were technical success, MR reduction, and 30-day mortality. After 1 year, all-cause mortality and residual MR were reported. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (216 MC, 196 PASCAL) treated between 2018 and 2020 were included. A total of 184 patients (92 in each treatment group) remained after propensity score matching. The rate of baseline MR ≥3 was 98.9% in both groups (P = 1.00). Both TEER systems achieved equally high technical success rates (97.8%; P = 1.00), resulting in residual MR ≤1 in 69.6% vs 77.1% of patients (P = 0.24) and MR reduction by ≥2 grades in 83.7% vs 92.4% of patients (P = 0.13) using the MC and PASCAL, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% in both cohorts (P = 0.98), and 1-year follow-up showed similar MR reductions (residual MR ≤1, 78.0% with MC vs 82.3% with PASCAL; P = 0.70) and comparable all-cause mortality (14.1% with MC vs 6.5% with PASCAL; P = 0.14). In multivariate regression analysis, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score independently correlated with an optimal result (MR ≤1), while device choice did not show a significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective multicenter study, the established MC and the novel PASCAL mitral valve TEER systems were safe and offered excellent performance with comparable short- and long-term outcomes.

Deferral of non-emergency cardiac procedures is associated with increased early emergency cardiovascular hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in anticipation of a demand surge for high-care hospital beds, many hospitals postponed non-emergency interventions of cardiac patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of cardiac patients whose non-emergency interventions had been deferred during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients whose non-emergency cardiac intervention had been cancelled between March 19th and April 30th, 2020 were included (study group). All patients were considered as deferrable according to current recommendations. Patients' outcomes after 12 months were compared to a seasonal control group who underwent non-emergency interventions in 2019 as scheduled. The primary endpoint was a composite of emergency cardiovascular hospitalization and death. Secondary endpoints were levels of symptoms and cardiac biomarkers. RESULTS: Outcomes of 193 consecutive patients in the study group were assessed and compared to 216 controls. The primary endpoint occurred significantly more often in the study group (HR 2.42, 95%CI 1.63-3.61, p < 0.001). This was driven by an increase in hospitalizations. Subgroup analyses showed that especially patients with a deferred transcatheter heart valve intervention experienced early emergency hospitalization (HR 9.55, 95%CI 3.70-24.62, p < 0.001). These findings were accompanied by more pronounced symptoms and higher biomarker levels. CONCLUSIONS: Deferral of non-emergency cardiac interventions to meet the higher demand for hospital beds during the COVID-19 crisis is associated with early emergency cardiovascular hospitalizations. Patients suffering from valvular heart disease especially constitute a vulnerable group. Consequently, our results suggest that current recommendations on the management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic need revision.

Body fat compartment determination by encoder-decoder convolutional neural network: application to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The objective of this study was to automate the discrimination and quantification of human abdominal body fat compartments into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) from T1-weighted MRI using encoder-decoder convolutional neural networks (CNN) and to apply the algorithm to a diseased patient sample, i.e., patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). One-hundred-and-fifty-five participants (74 patients with ALS and 81 healthy controls) were split in training (50%), validation (6%), and test (44%) data. SAT and VAT volumes were determined by a novel automated CNN-based algorithm of U-Net like architecture in comparison with an established protocol with semi-automatic assessment as the reference. The dice coefficients between the CNN predicted masks and the reference segmentation were 0.87 ± 0.04 for SAT and 0.64 ± 0.17 for VAT in the control group and 0.87 ± 0.08 for SAT and 0.68 ± 0.15 for VAT in the ALS group. The significantly increased VAT/SAT ratio in the ALS group in comparison to controls confirmed the previous results. In summary, the CNN approach using CNN of U-Net architecture for automated segmentation of abdominal adipose tissue substantially facilitates data processing and offers the opportunity to automatically discriminate abdominal SAT and VAT compartments. Within the research field of neurodegenerative disorders with body composition alterations like ALS, the unbiased analysis of body fat components might pave the way for these parameters as a potential biological marker or a secondary read-out for clinical trials.

Vascular Access-Site Choice and Outcomes in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Undergoing Coronary Catheterization in a High-Volume Transradial Center.

BACKGROUND: Transradial access for coronary angiography was observed to be superior to femoral access. Nevertheless, femoral artery access is still frequently used, especially in challenging subgroups with high procedural complexity, like patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). PURPOSE: We analyzed access-site choice and outcomes of CABG patients undergoing coronary catheterization in different clinical settings. METHODS: A total of 1206 consecutive CABG patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention were included in this study. Procedural and clinical outcomes were compared between transradial and transfemoral access. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of access-site choice. RESULTS: Coronary catheterization was performed via radial access in 753 patients (63.1%) and via femoral access in 442 patients (36.9%). During the study period, femoral artery utilization dropped from 55.2% to a minimum of 28.2% per year (P<.01). Short stature (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; P<.01), peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.42; P=.04), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR, 4.17; P<.001), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (OR, 2.56; P=.01), and coexisting left and right internal mammary artery (LIMA/RIMA) bypass grafts (OR, 2.67; P<.001) were independently associated with femoral access-site choice. Study outcomes including access-site complications (4.3% vs 1.6%; P<.01) as well as short- and long-term mortality (30-day mortality: 6.8% vs 2.0%; hazard ratio, 3.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-6.70; P<.001) were more likely to occur with femoral access. Length of stay was shorter in the radial cohort (3.7 ± 5.1 days vs 5.3 ± 7.2 days; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Radial access appears to be favorable even in complex CABG patients. Although radial access was set as the standard vascular approach, femoral access was chosen in one-third of all patients. Independent predictors for femoral access were short stature, peripheral artery disease, acute settings like CPR and STEMI, as well as coexisting LIMA and RIMA grafts.

Impact of Radial Access on Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.

PURPOSE: We investigated the impact of radial access on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) undergoing cardiac catheterization. METHODS: This retrospective monocenter study included 527 CABG patients undergoing cardiac catheterization via radial (58.1%, N = 306) or femoral access (41.9%, N = 221). Primary outcome measure was CI-AKI defined in accordance with the KDIGO criteria. Independent predictors for CI-AKI were assessed. 1-year mortality was assessed depending on the occurrence of CI-AKI. RESULTS: In total, 99 CABG patients (18.8%) developed CI-AKI within 48 h after cardiac catheterization. Compared to patients without CI-AKI, amount of contrast media used (203.1 ± 102.6 ml vs. 204.2 ± 98.2 ml; P = 0.892) as well as procedural times (87.9 ± 44.8 vs. 79.8 ± 37.0; P = 0.190) were similarly. Regarding vascular access, there was no significant difference in the incidence of CI-AKI between radial and femoral approach (19.0% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.907). However, poor left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72, P = 0.026), chronic kidney disease (OR = 2.30, P = 0.001) and acute coronary syndrome (OR = 1.64, P = 0.043) were independent predictors for CI-AKI. The occurrence of CI-AKI was significantly associated with an increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: With 18.8%, CI-AKI is a frequent complication in CABG patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Radial access did not decrease the risk when compared to the femoral approach.

Impact of extent of coronary artery disease and percutaneous revascularization assessed by the SYNTAX score on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed by the SYNTAX score (SS) and periprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Due to controversial data regarding the effect of CAD on outcomes after TAVR, proper revascularization strategies remain a matter of debate. METHODS: 553 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR were included in this study. SS was calculated for each patient at baseline and after PCI. Primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 60.2% of patients (N = 333) exhibited CAD with a mean SS of 10.8 ± 8.8. Of those, 120 patients (36.0%) received periprocedural PCI. In the treatment group, mean SS was decreased from 14.9 ± 9.1 to 6.3 ± 6.7. Patients with concomitant CAD suffered more frequently from myocardial infarction (MI) post TAVR compared to those without CAD (2.1% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.01). In the CAD cohort, MI rates were comparable between patients with and without PCI (2.2% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.71). Regarding SS, patients with a residual SS < 8 showed significant lower rates of one-year mortality (9.0% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.016) and MACCE (16.5% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.001). Besides left bundle brunch, predictors for an increased one-year mortality were a residual SS ≥ 8 in the CAD group (OR = 3.17; P = 0.011) and a EuroSCORE ≥ 4% in the entire study population (OR = 2.18; P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a residual SS-guided revascularization strategy may improve prognosis after TAVR in patients with concomitant CAD. PCI aiming for a residual SS < 8 was associated with improved one-year clinical outcomes.