Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 99, 2024 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238747

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption. METHODS: The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015-2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care. RESULTS: Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Intellectual Disability , Child, Preschool , Humans , Delivery of Health Care , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Health Status , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Longitudinal Studies
2.
BMJ Open ; 10(1): e032257, 2020 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Polyhandicap (PLH), defined by a combination of profound intellectual impairment and serious motor deficits, is a severe condition with complex disabilities. In France, care of the large majority of PLH individuals is managed in specialised rehabilitation centres or residential facilities, but some of PLH individuals are cared for at home. The aims of this study were to assess the self-perceived burden among informal caregivers of PLH individuals and to identify potential determinants of this burden. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (Neuropaediatric Department, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France). SETTINGS: PLH children were recruited from a specialised paediatric/neurological department. PARTICIPANTS: The selection criteria of caregivers were age above 18 years and being the PLH individual's next of kin. OUTCOMES MEASURES: From March 2015 to December 2016, data were collected from the caregivers, including sociodemographical data, health status, psycho-behavioural data (quality of life, mood disorders and coping) and self-perceived burden. In addition, the health status of the PLH individual was collected. Relationships between the burden scores and potential determinants were tested (correlations coefficients, Mann-Whitney tests, generalised estimating equations models). RESULTS: Eighty-four children were eligible; 77 families returned their questionnaire. The informal caregivers of PLH children experienced a high level of perceived burden (scores ranged from 55±20 to 81±12). Eighty per cent of them had more than 5 hours of daily caregiving and 51% of them had to get up more than twice during the night. The main factors associated with caregiver burden were age, financial issues, health status, daily care and coping strategies. The patients' health status was not associated with caregiver burden. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the caregiver burden determinants might be modifiable. These findings should help healthcare workers and health-decision makers implement specific and appropriate interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02400528.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Status , Self Concept , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Disabil Health J ; 12(4): 657-664, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30842063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the health status and care management of elderly individuals with polyhandicap* is lacking; however, a better understanding of the natural course of ageing in persons with severe and complex disability would help optimize preventive and curative care management strategies. OBJECTIVES: To describe persons with severe and complex disability aged 18-68 years by providing i) a description of their health status and ii) a description of their medications, medical devices and rehabilitation procedures. METHODS: This was an 18-month cross-sectional study including people aged 18-68 years with a combination of severe motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment. They were recruited from 4 specialized rehabilitation centres, 9 residential facilities, and a neurological department. The following data were collected: aetiology of severe and complex disability, health status, medical devices, and rehabilitation procedures. RESULTS: A total of 474 persons with severe and complex disability were included (N = 219 [18-34 years], N = 151 [35-49 years], N = 104 [50-68] years). The aetiology of severe and complex disability was unknown for 13%-17% of persons with severe and complex disability across the 3 age classes. Behavioural disorders and pain were more frequent in the oldest age classes. Elderly persons with severe and complex disability had more severe but less unstable severe and complex disability. Their neurodevelopmental was close to that of a 4-month-old child without progression across age. Gastrostomy was the most frequent device needed by the persons with severe and complex disability. CONCLUSIONS: The longevity of persons with severe and complex disability is improving; some of these persons, among whom are the least unstable and with less comorbidity, can survive for more than 50 years due to the improvement of preventive actions and supportive care.


Subject(s)
Aging , Disabled Persons , Nervous System Diseases , Neurodevelopmental Disorders , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Female , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Longevity , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/therapy , Rehabilitation Centers , Residential Facilities , Young Adult
4.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0211640, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30716093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polyhandicap (PLH) is a condition of severe and complex disabilities and is defined by a combination of profound intellectual impairment and serious motor deficits. Parents of PLH individuals are chronically confronted with stressful situations. The aims of this study are i) to assess and compare the quality of life (QoL) of a large panel of parents of PLH individuals with age- and gender-matched controls and ii) to identify potential determinants of parents' QoL. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study. Parents were recruited from 4 specialized rehabilitation centres, 9 residential facilities, and a specialized paediatric/neurological department. The selection criteria were age above 18 years and being the mother/father of a PLH individual. The data collected from the parents included sociodemographic, health status, and psycho-behavioural data (including QoL); additionally, the health status of the PLH individuals was collected. RESULTS: The QoL scores of all dimensions were significantly lower for parents than for controls. The main factors modulating parents' QoL were financial issues, health status, and coping strategies. The PLH individuals' health status was not associated with parents' QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Some QoL determinants might be amenable. These findings should help health care workers and health decision makers to implement specific and appropriate interventions.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/psychology , Parents/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fathers/psychology , Female , France , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mothers/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0199986, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29979745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were 1) to describe the health profiles and care management of polyhandicapped patients according to 2 modalities, specialized rehabilitation centers (SRC) and residential facilities (RF), and 2) to estimate the adequacy of care management of these patients. METHODS: This was an 18-month cross-sectional study including patients with a combination of severe motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment. The patients were from 4 SRC and 9 RF. The following data were collected: sociodemographics, health status, care management, and adequacy of care management. RESULTS: A total of 782 patients were included: 410 (52%) were cared for in SRC and 372 (48%) in RF. Global objective adequacy (health severity and age category) was higher for patients cared for in SRC compared with patients cared for in RF (57 vs. 44%, p< = 10-3). Global subjective adequacy (self-perception of the referring physician and request of change in structure) was higher for patients cared for in SRC in comparison with patients cared for in RF (98 vs. 92%, p< = 10-3). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides key elements of adequacy of care management modalities for polyhandicapped patients in France. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400528.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Patient Care Management/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Adult , Child , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Persons/psychology , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Female , France , Humans , Male , Patient Care Management/standards , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...