Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 107(3): 319-28, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21841049

ABSTRACT

We have conducted a meta-analysis of the clinical effects of morphine and hydromorphone to compare their benefit in analgesia. Embase and Medline were searched with an end-date of June 2009 for randomized, controlled trials or observational studies that addressed comparative analgesic and side-effects or particular side-effects. Two researchers independently identified included studies and extracted the data. Estimates of opioid effects were combined by using a random-effects model. Meta-analysis of eight studies suggested that hydromorphone (494 patients) provides slightly better (P=0.012) clinical analgesia than morphine (510 patients). The effect-size was small (Cohen's d=0.266) and disappeared when one study was removed, although the advantage of hydromorphone was more evident in studies of better quality (Jadad's rating). Side-effects were similar, for example, nausea (P=0.383, nine studies, 456 patients receiving hydromorphone and 460 morphine); vomiting (P=0.306, six studies, 246 patients receiving hydromorphone and 239 morphine); or itching (P=0.249, eight studies, 405 patients receiving hydromorphone, 410 morphine). This suggests some advantage of hydromorphone over morphine for analgesia. Additional potential clinical pharmacological advantages with regard to side-effects, such as safety in renal failure or during acute analgesia titration, are based on limited evidence and require substantiation by further studies.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Hydromorphone/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydromorphone/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 87(2): 204-11, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19907420

ABSTRACT

Ventilatory depression is a significant risk associated with the use of opioids. We assessed whether opioid-induced ventilatory depression can be selectively antagonized by an ampakine without reduction of analgesia. In 16 healthy men, after a single oral dose of 1,500 mg of the ampakine CX717, a target concentration of 100 ng/ml alfentanil decreased the respiratory frequency by only 2.9 +/- 33.4% as compared with 25.6 +/- 27.9% during placebo coadministration (P < 0.01).Blood oxygenation and the ventilatory response to hypercapnic challenge also showed significantly smaller decreases with CX717 than with placebo. In contrast, CX717 did not affect alfentanil-induced analgesia in either electrical or heat-based experimental models of pain. Both ventilatory depression and analgesia were reversed with 1.6 mg of naloxone. These results support the use of ampakines as selective antidotes in humans to counter opioid-induced ventilatory depression without affecting opioid-mediated analgesia.


Subject(s)
Alfentanil/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Isoxazoles/pharmacology , Pain/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Adult , Alfentanil/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Hypercapnia/physiopathology , Male , Naloxone/pharmacology , Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology , Oxygen/blood , Respiratory Insufficiency/chemically induced , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...