ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study evaluates the potential efficacy and robustness of functional bone marrow sparing (BMS) using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical cancer, with the goal of reducing hematologic toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IMPT plans with prescription dose of 45 Gy were generated for ten patients who have received BMS intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMRT). Functional bone marrow was identified by (18)F-flourothymidine positron emission tomography. IMPT plans were designed to minimize the volume of functional bone marrow receiving 5-40 Gy while maintaining similar target coverage and healthy organ sparing as IMRT. IMPT robustness was analyzed with ±3% range uncertainty errors and/or ±3 mm translational setup errors in all three principal dimensions. RESULTS: In the static scenario, the median dose volume reductions for functional bone marrow by IMPT were: 32% for V(5Gy), 47% for V(10Gy), 54% for V(20Gy), and 57% for V(40Gy), all with p<0.01 compared to IMRT. With assumed errors, even the worst-case reductions by IMPT were: 23% for V(5Gy), 37% for V(10Gy), 41% for V(20Gy), and 39% for V(40Gy), all with p<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: The potential sparing of functional bone marrow by IMPT for cervical cancer is significant and robust under realistic systematic range uncertainties and clinically relevant setup errors.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/radiation effects , Proton Therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , UncertaintyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the plan quality of proton spot scanning (SS) radiosurgery as a function of spot size (in-air sigma) in comparison to x-ray radiosurgery for treating peripheral brain lesions. METHODS: Single-field optimized (SFO) proton SS plans with sigma ranging from 1 to 8 mm, cone-based x-ray radiosurgery (Cone), and x-ray volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated for 11 patients. Plans were evaluated using secondary cancer risk and brain necrosis normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: For all patients, secondary cancer is a negligible risk compared to brain necrosis NTCP. Secondary cancer risk was lower in proton SS plans than in photon plans regardless of spot size (p = 0.001). Brain necrosis NTCP increased monotonically from an average of 2.34/100 (range 0.42/100-4.49/100) to 6.05/100 (range 1.38/100-11.6/100) as sigma increased from 1 to 8 mm, compared to the average of 6.01/100 (range 0.82/100-11.5/100) for Cone and 5.22/100 (range 1.37/100-8.00/100) for VMAT. An in-air sigma less than 4.3 mm was required for proton SS plans to reduce NTCP over photon techniques for the cohort of patients studied with statistical significance (p = 0.0186). Proton SS plans with in-air sigma larger than 7.1 mm had significantly greater brain necrosis NTCP than photon techniques (p = 0.0322). CONCLUSIONS: For treating peripheral brain lesions--where proton therapy would be expected to have the greatest depth-dose advantage over photon therapy--the lateral penumbra strongly impacts the SS plan quality relative to photon techniques: proton beamlet sigma at patient surface must be small (<7.1 mm for three-beam single-field optimized SS plans) in order to achieve comparable or smaller brain necrosis NTCP relative to photon radiosurgery techniques. Achieving such small in-air sigma values at low energy (<70 MeV) is a major technological challenge in commercially available proton therapy systems.
