Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 33(3): 441-447, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324665

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There have been both technological and philosophical advances over the last decade regarding pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Collectively, these devices are currently referred to as cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Technological advances include the introduction of leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous defibrillators and cardiac event recorders, enhancements regarding compatibility of CIEDs for MRI scanning, the ability to interrogate devices remotely, and improved programming modes that preserve battery life. Philosophical advances have been mainly in the area of perioperative management of CIED patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Current practice recommendations now acknowledge that not every patient requires a formal interrogation of their CIED before and after surgery (as was previously recommended). The response to magnet application is standardized across manufacturer's platforms, and it is known that sources of electromagnetic interference remote from the CIED and its leads do not usually cause any interference with device function. SUMMARY: Educated anesthesia teams can independently manage the vast majority of CIED patients perioperatively with magnet application alone. Furthermore, this portends enhanced patient safety and improved workflows in the perioperative period.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesiology/organization & administration , Pacemaker, Artificial , Perioperative Care/methods , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Patient Safety , Perioperative Period , Workflow
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...