The generality of effects of emotional experience on emotion-regulation choice.

To understand how emotional experiences affect general strategic preferences, we assessed participants' preferred strategies of regulating emotional responses to previewed and not-yet-encountered stimuli. For previewed stimuli, participants selected distraction more often than reappraisal for high- (vs. low-) intensity negative-valence visual images (replicating Sheppes, Scheibe, Suri, & Gross, 2011), and the same intensity/choice pattern emerged for previewed auditory sounds. Most notably, participants' recent emotional experiences also influenced their choices for regulating emotional responses to not-yet-encountered stimuli. Exposure to high- (vs. low-) intensity negative-valence visual images increased selection of distraction (vs. reappraisal) for regulating responses to upcoming (not-yet-encountered) visual images (Experiment 1), and the same intensity/choice pattern emerged whereby stimuli encountered in one modality (visual) impacted choices for regulating responses to stimuli of a different modality (auditory; Experiment 2). These results suggest that emotional experiences directly impact people's strategic inclinations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

An Investigation of the Reliability and Self-Regulatory Correlates of Conflict Adaptation.

The study of the conflict-adaptation effect, in which encountering information-processing conflict attenuates the disruptive influence of information-processing conflicts encountered subsequently, is a burgeoning area of research. The present study investigated associations among performance measures on a Stroop-trajectory task (measuring Stroop interference and conflict adaptation), on a Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST; measuring cognitive flexibility), and on self-reported measures of self-regulation (including impulsivity and tenacity). We found significant reliability of the conflict-adaptation effects across a two-week period, for response-time and accuracy. Variability in conflict adaptation was not associated significantly with any indicators of performance on the WCST or with most of the self-reported self-regulation measures. There was substantial covariance between Stroop interference for accuracy and conflict adaptation for accuracy. The lack of evidence of covariance across distinct aspects of cognitive control (conflict adaptation, WCST performance, self-reported self-control) may reflect the operation of relatively independent component processes.

Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control.

From the standpoint of conflict-monitoring theory (Botvinick et al., 2001), detecting an incident of information-processing conflict should attenuate the disruptive influence of information-processing conflicts encountered subsequently, by which time cognitive-control operations will have been engaged. To examine the generality of this conflict-adaptation process across task dimensions, the present research analyzed event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task that randomly varied the NoGo decision criterion applied across trials. Sequential analyses revealed reduced-amplitude fronto-central N2 and NoGo P3 responses on the second of two consecutive NoGo trials. Importantly, both of these conflict-adaptation effects were present only when the same NoGo decision criterion was applied across trials n and n-1. These findings support the theory that encountering information-processing conflict focuses attention on specific stimulus-response contingencies (Verguts & Notebaert, 2009) rather than engages general cognitive-control mechanisms (Freitas & Clark, 2015). Further implications for the generality of cognitive control are discussed.