Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(9S): S157-S161, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28214257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare short-term side effects of aspirin (ASA) 325 mg vs ASA 81 mg orally twice daily (PO BID) when used as thromboembolic prophylaxis following primary total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A 1-year prospective cohort study was performed on 643 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty patients operated on by a single surgeon. Two hundred eighty-two patients were administered ASA 325 mg PO BID and 361 patients were administered ASA 81 mg PO BID for 1 month. A questionnaire assessing the side effects of ASA intake was administered 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall rate of gastrointestinal side effects (GI upset and nausea) was 1.9%, but ASA 325 mg had a higher rate 9/282 (3.2%) than ASA 81 mg 3/361 (0.8%), P = .04. Overall GI bleeding was 0.9%, with 2/282 (0.7%) in the ASA 325 mg group, vs 4/361 (1.1%) in the ASA 81 mg group, P = .70. One patient in the ASA 81 mg group (0.3%) developed a deep vein thrombosis. No patient developed pulmonary embolism, periprosthetic joint infection, tinnitus, wheezing and/or shortness of breath, chest pain, or headaches. In the ASA 325 mg group, 9/282 (3.2%) discontinued ASA and in the ASA 81 mg group, 8/361 (2.2%) discontinued ASA, P = .47. Four patients in the ASA 325 group (1.4%) changed to ASA 81 mg. CONCLUSION: ASA 81 mg is associated with significantly less GI distress and nausea compared with ASA 325 mg. GI bleeding was equally prevalent between the 2 dosing regimens, so patients need to be informed of this risk regardless of the ASA dose.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology
3.
J Biomech Eng ; 124(6): 699-705, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12596638

ABSTRACT

Multiaxial failure properties of trabecular bone are important for modeling of whole bone fracture and can provide insight into structure-function relationships. There is currently no consensus on the most appropriate form of multiaxial yield criterion for trabecular bone. Using experimentally validated, high-resolution, non-linear finite element models, biaxial plain strain boundary conditions were applied to seven bovine tibial specimens. The dependence of multiaxial yield properties on volume fraction was investigated to quantify the interspecimen heterogeneity in yield stresses and strains. Two specimens were further analyzed to determine the yield properties for a wide range of biaxial strain loading conditions. The locations and quantities of tissue level yielding were compared for on-axis, transverse, and biaxial apparent level yielding to elucidate the micromechanical failure mechanisms. As reported for uniaxial loading of trabecular bone, the yield strains in multiaxial loading did not depend on volume fraction, whereas the yield stresses did. Micromechanical analysis indicated that the failure mechanisms in the on-axis and transverse loading directions were mostly independent. Consistent with this, the biaxial yield properties were best described by independent curves for on-axis and transverse loading. These findings establish that the multiaxial failure of trabecular bone is predominantly governed by the strain along the loading direction, requiring separate analytical expressions for each orthotropic axis to capture the apparent level yield behavior.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Tibia/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Animals , Anisotropy , Cattle , Compressive Strength , Computer Simulation , Elasticity , Finite Element Analysis , In Vitro Techniques , Nonlinear Dynamics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stress, Mechanical , Tensile Strength
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...