Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurosurg Focus Video ; 11(1): V17, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957427

ABSTRACT

The responsive neurostimulator system has become increasingly popular in the surgical management of refractory epilepsy, with targeting of various thalamic nuclei showing promising results in select patients. A 42-year-old female presented for evaluation of refractory epilepsy consisting of generalized tonic-clonic and focal seizures with preserved awareness. Phase I and II monitoring suggested multifocal bilateral epilepsy with bilateral frontal onset, and the patient underwent robot-guided bilateral centromedian thalamic placement of the RNS System. In this operative video, the authors share their institutional experience and protocol utilizing the ExcelsiusGPS robot in the placement of the RNS System in the thalamus. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.4.FOCVID243.

2.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0275677, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes in traumatically injured geriatric patients but has not been well-studied in geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between frailty and outcomes after TBI. METHODS: The records of all patients aged 70 or older admitted from home to the neurosurgical service of a single institution for non-operative TBI between January 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was adverse discharge disposition (either in-hospital expiration or discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF), hospice, or home with hospice). Secondary outcomes included major inpatient complication, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. RESULTS: 100 patients were included, 90% of whom presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 14-15. The mean length of stay was 3.78 days. 7% had an in-hospital complication, and 44% had an unfavorable discharge destination. 49% of patients attended follow-up within 3 months. The rate of readmission within 30 days was 13%. Patients were characterized as low frailty (FRAIL score 0-1, n = 35, 35%) or high frailty (FRAIL score 2-5, n = 65, 65%). In multivariate analysis controlling for age and other factors, frailty category (aOR 2.63, 95CI [1.02, 7.14], p = 0.005) was significantly associated with unfavorable discharge. Frailty was not associated with increased readmission rate, LOS, or rate of complications on uncontrolled univariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Frailty is associated with increased odds of unfavorable discharge disposition for geriatric patients admitted with TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Frailty , Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Cohort Studies , Frail Elderly , Humans , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 4979231, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345525

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic techniques in spine surgery are rapidly evolving, with operations becoming progressively safer and less invasive. Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) procedures comprise many spine procedures that have benefited from endoscopic assistance and minimally invasive approaches. Though considerable variation exists within endoscopic LIF, similar principles and techniques are common to all types. Nonetheless, innovations continually emerge, requiring trainees and experienced surgeons to maintain familiarity with the domain and its possibilities. We present two illustrative cases of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a comprehensive literature review of the different approaches to endoscopic LIF procedures.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion , Endoscopy/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbosacral Region , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods
4.
AJOB Neurosci ; 12(1): 57-67, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528320

ABSTRACT

Intracranial electrophysiological research methods, including those applying electrodes on the cortical surface or in deep structures, have become increasingly important in human neuroscience. They also pose novel ethical concerns, as human studies require the participation of neurological patients undergoing surgery for conditions such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease. Research participants in this setting may be vulnerable to conflicts of interest, therapeutic misconception, and other threats to valid recruitment and consent. We conducted semi-structured interviews with investigators from NIH-funded studies involving recording or stimulation inside the human skull. We elicited perspectives on study recruitment and consent procedures, and analyzed transcripts using a modified grounded theory approach. We interviewed 26 investigators from 19 separate intracranial electrophysiology studies, who described two study types: opportunity studies (n = 15) and experimental trials (n = 4). Respondents described significant heterogeneity in recruitment and consent procedures, even among studies employing similar techniques. In some studies, clinician-investigators were specifically barred from obtaining consent, while in other studies clinician-investigators were specifically required to obtain consent; regulatory guidance was inconsistent. Respondents also described various models for subject selection, the timing of consent, and continuing consent for temporally extended studies. Respondents expressed ethical concerns about participants' vulnerability and the communication of research-related risks. We found a lack of consensus among investigators regarding recruitment and consent methods in human intracranial electrophysiology. This likely reflects the novelty and complexity of such studies and indicates a need for further discussion and development of best practices in this research domain.


Subject(s)
Electrophysiology , Informed Consent , Therapeutic Misconception , Brain , Humans , Research Design , Research Personnel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...