Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Microbiol ; 76(3): 270-278, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30721320

ABSTRACT

We tested the hypothesis that supplementation with protein improves fermentation parameters without damaging the rumen microbial populations of beef cattle grazing Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu during the dry season. Four rumen-cannulated Nellore bulls (571 ± 31 kg of body weight) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. The treatments were not supplemented with concentrate (only free-choice mineral salt ad libitum) and supplemented (supplements with low-LPSU, medium-MPS, and high protein supplement-HPS), supplying 155, 515, and 875 g/animal/day of crude protein (CP), respectively. The abundance of each target taxon was calculated as a fraction of the total 16S rRNA gene copies in the samples, using taxon-specific and domain bacteria primers. There was no difference (P > 0.05) across treatments for intakes of dry matter (DM), forage and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), digestibility of DM and NDF, and ruminal pH. Animals supplemented with concentrate had greater (P < 0.05) intakes and digestibility of CP, ether extract and non-fibrous carbohydrate contents of the substrates (EE + NFC), and ruminal ammonia nitrogen (RAN) compared to control. Bulls that received only mineral salt had lower proportions of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and had greater (P < 0.05) proportions of Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Methanogen archaea than bulls supplemented with concentrate. The MPS animals had greater (P < 0.05) intake and digestibility of CP, RAN concentration, and had lower (P < 0.05) proportions of Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Selenomonas ruminantium than LPSU animals. The HPS provided higher (P < 0.05) intake of CP, RAN and proportion of Ruminococcus albus when compared with MPS. In conclusion, supply of 515 g/animal/day of protein via supplement provides better ruminal conditions for the growth of cellulolytic bacteria of bulls on pasture during dry season.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Rumen/metabolism , Rumen/microbiology , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/growth & development , Cattle , Fermentation , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Male , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Seasons , Tropical Climate
2.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 50(4): 715-720, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29235046

ABSTRACT

Supplementation of animals in the rainy season is essential to maximise weight gain. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the effects of supplementation with low-, medium- and high-protein levels on nutritional parameters of grazing beef cattle in the rainy season. Eight rumen-cannulated Nellore bulls (437 kg body weight) were used in a 4 × 4 double Latin square design with four supplements and four experimental periods. The treatments were mineral supplement (ad libitum) and supplements with low-protein (LPSU), medium-protein (MPS) and high-protein (HPS) levels, providing 106, 408 and 601 g/day of crude protein (CP), respectively. There was no difference (P > 0.05) between treatments for dry matter and forage intake, ruminal pH, ruminal ammonia nitrogen (RAN) at time 0 (before supplementation) and microbial protein yield. Animals on MPS had a higher (P > 0.05) intake and digestibility of CP, higher RAN levels (3 and 6 h after supplementation), increased nitrogen intake and a better nitrogen balance than animals on LPSU. The HPS provided higher (P > 0.05) RAN at time 6 and a better nitrogen balance when compared with MPS. We therefore infer that the high-protein supplement positively impacts nitrogen metabolism and efficiency in grazing beef cattle during the rainy season.


Subject(s)
Cattle/metabolism , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Nitrogen/metabolism , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Body Weight , Digestion , Fermentation , Male , Poaceae , Rain , Random Allocation , Red Meat , Rumen/metabolism , Seasons , Tropical Climate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL