Intrathecal dose intensification by CNS status at diagnosis in the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with CNS2 status predicts inferior outcome and a high rate of CNS relapse, similar to overt CNS leukemia (CNS3). The purpose of this study was to determine if intrathecal (IT) dose intensification during induction would improve outcomes and reduce CNS relapse for CNS2 disease. METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2014, children (1-14 years) with newly diagnosed ALL were treated at the Princess Noorah Oncology Centre (PNOC) following modifications of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols. We intensified IT methotrexate (ITM) during induction for patients with CNS2 disease. Patients were evaluated for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). RESULTS: 449 children with T-cell (14.3%) or B-cell (85.7%) ALL were treated using PNOC-SR or PNOC-HR regimens (Jan 2001- Dec 2007) or CALL08 regimens (Arm A [SR], Arm B [IR], and Arm C [HR]) (Jan 2008 - Dec 2014). The 5-year OS, DFS, and CIR were 87.2 ± 1.6%, 81.7 ± 1.9%, and 13.0 ± 1.7%, respectively. The OS and DFS of patients with CNS2 were significantly superior to that of patients with CNS3 (P = 0.025 and P = 0.019, respectively). Patients with CNS2 had similar OS and DFS to those with CNS1. None of the patients with CNS2 at initial diagnosis experienced CNS relapse. CONCLUSIONS: ITM intensification during induction was associated with elimination of CNS recurrence in patients with CNS2 disease and childhood ALL. Controlled studies are needed to confirm this observation.

Early vs. late MRD response- and risk-based treatment intensification of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective pilot study from Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Refinement of risk-based treatment stratification by minimal residual disease (MRD) at different time points has improved outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this prospective study we evaluated effects of such stratification, including intensification of therapy based on response assessment at day-15 and MRD at day-29 of induction to test if treatment intensification would improve outcomes. METHODS: 241 patients, 1-14 years old, newly diagnosed with ALL, were recruited and stratified by risk and MRD response into three treatment Arms (A, B, or C). Arm A was modified from COG AALL0331, B from AALL0232, and C from AALL0232 and AALL0434. Assignments were according to NCI risk, phenotype, rapid vs. slow early response (SER), steroid pretreatment, MLL rearrangement (MLLR), CNS3, and testicular involvement. Patients on Arm A had treatment intensified early based on day-15 marrow results or late based on end-of-induction MRD. RESULTS: 5-year OS, EFS, and CIR were 89.5% ± 4.0%, 87.6% ± 4.3%, and 7.1% ± 3.5%. No significant difference was found by B- vs. T cell phenotype. 5-year OS, EFS, and CIR for B-cell ALL were 90.5% ± 2.4%, 88.7% ± 2.6%, and 6.4% ± 2.0%. Outcomes for patients with t(1;19)/TCF3-PBX1 and MLLR were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) worse than for other patients. MRD level at end-of-induction associated with outcomes, but association with a specific MRD value at end-of-induction varied significantly by NCI-risk group. Late treatment intensification based on end-of-induction MRD significantly improved survival outcomes for NCI-SR patients, however, patients with NCI-HR and positive MRD at end-of-induction had significantly inferior outcomes despite intensification. MRD transitions between day-15 and day-29 of induction associated with differences for OS and EFS. CONCLUSIONS: Arm switching to a more intensive protocol had mixed results. Assigning patients by end-of-induction MRD-risk alone did not reflect response kinetics of the different NCI-risk groups. Although late treatment intensification improved outcomes of NCI-SR patients with positive MRD at end-of-induction, further refinement is needed to improve outcomes of NCI-HR with SER. Integration of NCI-risk group with specific MRD value and time point allows more refined treatment stratification.Trial Registration Protocols were approved by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center and Ethics Review Committee RC08053J.

High-dose methotrexate vs. Capizzi methotrexate for the treatment of childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Sixty-three children (1-14 years of age) newly diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia were treated from January 2001 to December 2014. Patient outcomes were evaluated based on the regimen received; Capizzi methotrexate (C-MTX) vs. high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 54 of 60 (90.0%) patients and 3 patients died during induction. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 88.3 ±â€¯6.5% and 85 ±â€¯7.5%, respectively. Post-induction, 35 patients were treated with HDMTX and 25 with C-MTX. There was no difference in OS or DFS for patients treated with HDMTX vs. C-MTX (P > 0.05 for both). Central nervous system involvement (CNS3) was associated with inferior survival outcomes compared to Non-CNS3 patients (OS, CNS3 73.3 ±â€¯9.1% vs.non-CNS3 93.2 ±â€¯2.6%, (P = 0.045) and DFS, CNS3 66.7 ±â€¯10.4% vs. non-CNS3 90.9 ±â€¯3.1% (P = 0.0163)). Delayed radiation in CNS3 was associated with relapse (P = 0.0037) regardless of regimen. Thus optimization of CNS-directed therapy for patients with CNS3 is needed.

Comparison of clinical trial versus non-clinical trial treatment outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia using comparable regimens.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment regimens tested in major clinical trials, conducted by cooperative groups, are often adapted as standard of care by cancer centers with the hope to replicate the treatment outcomes reported in these landmark studies. It is therefore postulated that applying clinical trial regimens in a non-clinical trial setting yield similar outcomes. The aim of the present study was to explore this hypothesis in the context of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 224 consecutive pediatric ALL cases treated between January 2001 and December 2007. Standard-risk (SR) patients were treated on CCG-1991 (regimen OD) while high-risk (HR) patients were treated on CCG-1961 (regimen D). Results were compared with those of the equivalent regimen in the original clinical trials. Statistical analysis was carried using chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Comparison of treatment outcomes revealed that SR patients had inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) of (89.0 ± 2.9 vs. 96.0% ± 0.9%); event-free survival of (82.3 ± 3.5 vs. 88.7% ± 1.4%); and relapse rate of (15.8 vs. 9.3% (P = 0.034)) compared to patients treated in the clinical trial. However, no statistically significant difference in treatment outcomes was observed between HR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using comparable regimens, suboptimal outcomes were noted in SR patients implying that similar treatments do not necessarily yield similar outcomes. This underscores the need to evaluate outcomes of adapted regimens to identify areas that need further improvement in centers not enrolling patients on prospective collaborative clinical trials.

Does the early intensification of intrathecal therapy improve outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with CNS2/TLP+ status at diagnosis?

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether the addition of two extra intrathecal methotrexate (ITM) doses during induction in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients eliminate the prognostic significance of CNS2/TLP+ status. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 224 patients according to the central nervous system (CNS) involvement at diagnosis: CNS1, CNS2, or CNS3. Patients with CNS2/TLP+ received two additional ITM doses during induction. Patients were treated according to the Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-1991/1961 protocols between January 2001 and December 2007. RESULTS: The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for the ALL patients in the CNS1, CNS2, and CNS3 groups were 80.4 ± 3.0, 100, and 73.5 ± 11.3%, respectively; a non-significant difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.063). However, the patients with CNS2 had significantly better survival compared with the CNS3 patients (P = 0.03). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates for the three groups were 17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-22.9), 0, and 18.8% (95% CI: 4.3-41.1), respectively; (P = 0.214) and those of isolated or combined CNS relapse were 9.6 (95% CI: 5.8-14.5), 0 and 6.3% (95% CI: 0.3-25.8), respectively (P = 0.424). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the intensification of ITM therapy during induction improves outcomes in patients with CNS2/TLP+ status and eliminates its prognostic significance. This suggests that early intensification using CNS-directed therapy is beneficial in controlling minimal CNS disease.

Identifying causes of variability in outcomes in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in a resource-rich developing country.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in developing countries is less favorable than in developed countries, primarily due to resource constraints. However, it is unknown whether the therapeutic results differ. Thus, we hypothesized that outcomes in resource-rich developing countries would be similar to those in industrialized regions. PROCEDURE: We performed a retrospective analysis of 224 consecutive children with ALL, who were treated according to the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) protocols between January 2001 and December 2007. High-risk (HR) and standard-risk (SR) patients were treated with modified CCG-1961 and CCG-1991 protocols, respectively. Modifications included substitution of dexamethasone for prednisone in HR patients and addition of two intrathecal methotrexate treatments for CNS2 patients during induction. All patients received double delayed intensification with two interim maintenance phases. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 84.7 ± 2.4%, 77.0 ± 2.9%, and 81.4 ± 2.7%, respectively. Remission was achieved in 98.1% of the patients. Induction failure and relapse rates were 1.9% and 15.1%, respectively. Death as the first event occurred in 6.4% of cases, of which 2.7% and 3.7% involved deaths in induction and remission, respectively. Interestingly, a significant reduction in induction deaths was observed over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the encouraging results observed in the present study, our patients displayed significantly lower survival outcomes compared to subjects treated in major clinical trials conducted by leading leukemia cooperative groups. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for targeted interventions to reduce death as the first event in developing regions.

Outcome of children older than one year with neuroblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of children older than one year with neuroblastoma treated at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of 52 children older than one year with neuroblastoma (NBL) treated at our center between September 1987 and May 2003. Treatment consisted of OPEC chemotherapy regimen (vincristine, cisplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide) or alternating OPEC/OJEC (carboplatin in place of cisplatin), surgical resection +/- radiotherapy (RT). No patient received high dose therapy (HDT). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (65%) were stage 4, 12 (23%) stage 3, and 6 (11%) stage 2. Three stage 2 patients were treated with surgery only, all are alive in complete remission (CR). All stage 3 and 4 patients were treated with chemotherapy and surgery +/- RT. After induction chemotherapy, CR was achieved in 17 patients (32%) and partial remission in 10 (19%). Complete surgical resection was possible in 11 patients (22%). Disease recurrence or progression occurred in 27 patients (51%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 4-120), the 2-year event free survival was 10%, 82%, and 87% and the overall survival was 12%, 83%, and 100% for stage 4, 3, and 2. CONCLUSION: Children older than one year with localized NBL have good prognosis compared to those with stage 4. The use of HDT may improve the outcome in the latter group. Toxicity was significant, and adoption of risk-stratified treatment may help to reduce treatment complications.

Stage 4S neuroblastoma, a disseminated tumor with excellent outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical features and outcome of all cases of stage 4S neuroblastoma treated at our center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of all patients (n=75) with neuroblastoma treated at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between 1986 and 2005. We studied the clinical features and outcome of patients with stage 4S neuroblastoma. RESULTS: Six patients (8%) were confirmed to have stage 4S neuroblastoma. Three were boys with a median age at diagnosis of 4.5 months (range 28 days-11 months). Four patients required no intervention. The remaining 2 patients were treated with chemotherapy due to progressive hepatomegaly and respiratory distress. No patient required radiotherapy or surgical intervention. With a median follow up of 4 years (range 9 months-15.5 years), all patients are alive and well. Two patients continue to have a residual abdominal mass, while complete resolution occurred in the others. CONCLUSION: Stage 4S neuroblastoma is a special tumor that carries excellent prognosis. Spontaneous regression may occur and intervention is only required in symptomatic patients.

A pilot study of prophylactic ciprofloxacin during delayed intensification in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that prophylactic administration of an appropriate antibiotic following each delayed intensification (DI) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) would reduce the episodes of fever and bacteremia associated with neutropenia, and hence reduce both the rate and duration of hospitalization. PROCEDURE: All patients in the study were treated according to a modified Medical Research Council United Kingdom ALL XI (MRC UKALL XI) protocol utilizing three DI courses. Between June and December 2000 patients received prophylactic ciprofloxacin following DI courses. The rates of hospitalization and bacteremias were compared to ALL patients who had received between one and three DI courses prior to June 2000. RESULTS: There were 69 patients who received a total of 194 DIs (controls 130; study group 64). The rate of hospitalization was 90% in the controls and 58% in the study group (P < 0.001). The median hospital stay was 10.1 days for controls and 6.0 for the study group (P < 0.001). Intensive care unit admissions were reduced from 12 to 1.5% (P = 0.02). The overall rate of proven bacteremia was reduced from 22 to 9% (P = 0.028). There were no Gram-negative bacteremias in the study group compared to 10 (7.7%) in the controls (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to historical controls, patients in this study receiving prophylactic ciprofloxacin had a reduced rate and duration of hospitalization and incidence of Gram-negative bacteremia.

Factors influencing central line infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of a single institutional study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the rates of infection in external catheters (ECs) and totally implantable devices (TIDs) and the effect of timing of insertion in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PROCEDURE: Central line data was collected on all children with ALL referred to the National Guard Hospital, Jeddah. Data was collected retrospectively from 1996 to September 1999 and prospectively thereafter. Only ECs were inserted prior to 1999 subsequently TIDs were preferred. RESULTS: One hundred forty eight children with ALL, mean age 5.1 years had 129 ECs and 70 TIDs inserted for a total of 41,382 catheter days. The overall rate of infective episodes (infections/1,000 catheter days) was 3.43. Of the initial 148 lines 100 developed complications of which 76 (51%) were secondary to an infective episode. Only young age and treatment protocol were risk factors for first line infections (P < 0.05). There was weak evidence that ECs had an earlier time to infection compared to TIDs (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, population central lines were associated with a high rate of infection. Treatment protocol and age were the only significant risk factors when only first lines were considered. Delaying catheter insertion for more than 3 weeks from diagnosis did not reduce the risk of infection.