Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 53(9): 1141-1147, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIM: Although acute lower GI bleeding (LGIB) represents a significant healthcare burden, prospective real-life data on management and outcomes are scanty. Present multicentre, prospective cohort study was aimed at evaluating mortality and associated risk factors and at describing patient management. METHODS: Adult outpatients acutely admitted for or developing LGIB during hospitalization were consecutively enrolled in 15 high-volume referral centers. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, interventions and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Overall 1,198 patients (1060 new admissions;138 inpatients) were included. Most patients were elderly (mean-age 74±15 years), 31% had a Charlson-Comorbidity-Index ≥3, 58% were on antithrombotic therapy. In-hospital mortality (primary outcome) was 3.4% (95%CI 2.5-4.6). At logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of mortality were increasing age, comorbidity, inpatient status, hemodynamic instability at presentation, and ICU-admission. Colonoscopy had a 78.8% diagnostic yield, with significantly higher hemostasis rate when performed within 24-hours than later (21.3% vs.10.8%, p = 0.027). Endoscopic hemostasis was associated with neither in-hospital mortality nor rebleeding. A definite or presumptive source of bleeding was disclosed in 90.4% of investigated patients. CONCLUSION: Mortality in LGIB patients is mainly related to age and comorbidities. Although early colonoscopy has a relevant diagnostic yield and is associated with higher therapeutic intervention rate, endoscopic hemostasis is not associated with improved clinical outcomes [ClinicalTrial.gov number: NCT04364412].


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
Dig Liver Dis ; 51(10): 1380-1387, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010743

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common endoscopic procedure used to provide nutritional support. AIM: To prospectively evaluate the mortality and complication incidences after PEG insertion or replacement. METHODS: All patients who underwent PEG insertion or replacement were included. Details on patient characteristics, ongoing therapies, comorbidities, and indication for PEG placement/replacement were collected, along with informed consent form signatures. Early and late (30-day) complications and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: 950 patients (47.1% male) were enrolled in 25 centers in Lombardy, a region of Northern Italy. Patient mean age was 73 years. 69.5% of patients had ASA status 3 or 4. First PEG placement was performed in 594 patients. Complication and mortality incidences were 4.8% and 5.2%, respectively. The most frequent complication was infection (50%), followed by bleeding (32.1%), tube dislodgment (14.3%), and buried bumper syndrome (3.6%). At multivariable analysis, age (OR 1.08 per 1-year increase, 95% CI, 1.0-1.16, p = 0.010) and BMI (OR 0.86 per 1-point increase, 95% CI, 0.77-0.96, p = 0.014) were factors associated with mortality. PEG replacement was carried out in 356 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8%, while complications occurred in 1.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that PEG placement is a safe procedure. Mortality was not related to the procedure itself, confirming that careful patient selection is warranted.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/methods , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
3.
Rays ; 31(1): 3-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16999367

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic palliation is the most suitable approach to improve quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer since diagnosis is often made at an advanced stage, when radical treatment is unfeasible. Endoscopy offers several techniques to palliate dysphagia either by stenting the stenosis or by reducing the tumor mass with thermoablation. A small number of randomized controlled trials is available to compare the efficacy of different techniques and the ideal palliation has not been defined as yet. Recently, the development of self-expandable covered metal stents has rapidly gained ground in the endoscopy units throughout the world as a simple, single step procedure for palliation of dysphagia.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagoscopy , Palliative Care/methods , Catheterization , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Electrocoagulation , Humans , Laser Therapy , Photochemotherapy , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...