Donor Monoclonal Gammopathy May Cause Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Prior research on donor monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been inadequate regarding the risk for lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ transplantation recipients. Seven organ recipients from two different donors developed lymphoproliferative disease. The origin of the malignancy was determined by use of microsatellite analysis, and the plasma of the two donors was analyzed with the use of electrophoresis. The clinical courses of the seven recipients were followed for 36-60 months. One donor transmitted lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma to two kidney recipients and MGUS to a liver recipient, all IgMκ. A second donor caused IgGλ myeloma in two kidney and one liver recipient, and IgGλ gammopathy in a heart recipient. Transplant nephrectomy was performed in three kidney recipients and remission was achieved. The fourth kidney recipient has kept the graft and the disease has progressed. The liver recipient died from myeloma. There were no clinical signs of lymphoproliferative disease in the donors, but retrospective serum analyses showed M-components, IgMκ (37 g/L) and IgGλ (8 g/L). Donors with MGUS may cause donor-transmitted malignancies via passenger lymphocytes/plasma cells in solid organ recipients. The results call for a large register study of the incidence of donor MGUS and lymphoproliferative disease in their recipients.

Kidney transplantation--a 46-year experience from the Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

The limiting factor in organ transplantation is the availability of organs. Ongoing work to improve donation rates both at the public and the organizational level in donating hospitals is essential. We also think that encouragement of live donation is important, and the possibility of ABO incompatible transplantation has increased the number of LD transplantations. The one-year graft survival rate is excellent and focus has shifted towards achieving long-term results to reduce the attrition rate. There is also an increasing interest in studying and working to reduce comorbidities on a long-term basis and thus, improve survival rates and recipient quality of life.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to either mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus improves renal function in liver transplant recipients with chronic kidney disease: results of a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and a risk factor for mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The use of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression is an important etiologic factor for developing CKD. CNI discontinuation or minimization protocols with replacement of the CNI with non-nephrotoxic drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (SRL), may have the potential to preserve or recover renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, single-center study with CNI discontinuation, OLT recipients with CKD (measured glomerular filtration rate [GFRm] 15-45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) were randomized to either SRL or MMF-based immunosuppression. The main objective was to study the effect of CNI discontinuation on renal function. Secondary aims were to assess the frequency of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) and adverse events (AE). Renal function was followed with GFRm using 51-Chromium EDTA clearance at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Patients were stratified according to baseline GFRm > versus <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The 25 patients were enrolled for MMF (n = 13) or SRL (n = 12). The median age at inclusion was 59 years (range, 25-66) and the median number of years after OLT was 4.4 (range, 1-13). Twenty-two patients were followed up for a year; MMF (n = 12) and SRL (n = 10). RESULTS: Mean GFRm for the whole cohort (n = 25) was 31+/-8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline. After 3 months the GFRm (n = 23) increased to 40+/-10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .0001) and at 1 year 42 +/- 11 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 22). There was not significant difference between the MMF and the SRL study arms. The cohort (n = 8) with baseline GFRm <30 mL showed a 63% (P = .003) increased filtration after 1 year. There was no significant difference in the frequency or severity of AE between the study arms with the exception of oral ulcerations and persistent hypertriglyceridemia in the SRL group. Two deaths occurred, 1 in each study arm, both probably unrelated to the change in immunosuppression. There were no BPAR episodes. CONCLUSION: CNI discontinuation and replacement with either MMF or SRL resulted in a significant improvement in renal function even in those patients with severe CKD. The protocol was effective with no acute rejection episodes. The SRL arm showed a higher frequency of oral apthous ulcerations and hypertriglyceridemia. Future studies addressing long-term renal function after CNI discontinuation are needed.

Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.

For more than a decade Liberase HI was commonly used as the standard enzyme blend for clinical human islet isolation until enforced replacement by collagenase NB1 (NB1). This change resulted initially in a reduction in islet isolation outcome and transplant activities worldwide. This retrospective study was initiated to compare the efficiency of NB1 premium grade with Liberase in 197 human islet isolations. All pancreata were processed between January 2006 and June 2008 utilizing the same procedures for isolation and quality assessment except the administration of preselected lots of either Liberase (n = 101) or NB1 (n = 96). Utilizing Liberase, significantly more digested tissue and purified islet yield was produced compared to NB1. In contrast, the use of NB1 was associated with significantly higher purity and glucose stimulation index during dynamic perifusion. The expression of proinflammatory markers was almost identical except tissue factor expression, which was higher after utilization of Liberase. No difference was found in the percentage of pancreata fulfilling the criteria for clinical islet transplantation. The results suggest that Liberase is more efficient for pancreas dissociation than collagenase NB1 but seems to be more harmful to exocrine cells and islet tissue.

Positron emission tomography in clinical islet transplantation.

The fate of islets in clinical transplantation is unclear. To elude on this positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed for 60 min during islet transplantation in five patients receiving six transplants. A fraction of the islets (23%) were labeled with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) and carefully mixed with unlabeled islets just prior to intraportal transplantation. The peak radioactivity concentration in the liver was found at 19 min after start of islet infusion and corresponded to only 75% of what was expected, indicating that islets are lost during the transplantation procedure. No accumulation of radioactivity was found in the lungs. A nonphysiological peak of C-peptide was found in plasma during and immediately after transplantation in all subjects. Distribution in the liver was heterogeneous with wide variations in location and concentration. Islets found in areas with concentrations of >400 IEQ/cc liver tissue varied between 1% and 32% of the graft in different subjects. No side effects attributed to the PET/CT procedure were found. Clinical outcome in all patients was comparable to that previously observed indicating that the [(18)F]FDG labeling procedure did not harm the islets. The technique has potential to be used to assess approaches to enhance islet survival and engraftment in clinical transplantation.

Optimising islet engraftment is critical for successful clinical islet transplantation.

Clinical islet transplantation is currently being explored as a treatment for persons with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycaemia unawareness. Although 'proof-of-principle' has been established in recent clinical studies, the procedure suffers from low efficacy. At the time of transplantation, the isolated islets are allowed to embolise the liver after injection in the portal vein, a procedure that is unique in the area of transplantation. A novel view on the engraftment of intraportally transplanted islets is presented that could explain the low efficacy of the procedure.

Outcome of renal transplantation subsequent to liver, heart, or lung transplantation.

Renal dysfunction is a growing problem after liver, heart, or lung transplantation with the subsequent need for dialysis or renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome after a subsequent kidney transplantation (secondary kidney transplantation) in liver, heart, or lung transplantation recipients. All secondary kidney transplantation patients from 1985 to 2006 were identified for the cause of kidney failure, time after initial transplantation, and current kidney function. One thousand two hundred three patient charts were reviewed including 22 (1.8%) secondary kidney transplantations: eight after lung, eight after heart, and six after liver transplantation. Renal failure was the result of perioperative renal failure (n = 3), toxic effects of cyclosporine (n = 16), a combination of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity and vascular ischemia (n = 3), or chronic renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease (n = 1). The median time after the initial organ transplantation was 114 months (range 30 to 241 months). The most recent median creatinine value was 103 micromol/L (82 to 704 micromol/L). Renal transplant rejection was noted in five patients: four in the lung transplant group, and one after heart transplantation. Three patients were deceased, one from secondary renal failure. One renal allograft was removed after renal artery thrombosis. In conclusion, there is sometimes a need for subsequent kidney transplantation after liver, heart, or lung transplantation. The outcome of renal transplantation subsequent to liver, heart, or lung transplantation is good with satisfactory renal function in this study population.

Preemptive therapy with pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin after liver transplantation for hepatitis C cirrhosis.

UNLABELLED: We present our results of preemptive treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin after liver transplantation for hepatitis C cirrhosis. PATIENTS: Between September 2001 and August 2002, four patients were started on combination therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha-2b (1microg/kg weekly) and ribavirin (400-1000 mg/d) 3 to 4 weeks' posttransplant. Treatment was continued for 6 (genotype 3a, 2 patients) or 12 (genotype 1b, 2 patients) months. Virologic and biochemical responses as well as side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Two patients (genotype 3a) became HCV (hepatitis C virus)-RNA negative after 3 months of therapy and are persistently negative 20 and 14 months after end of therapy. One patient (genotype 1b) became HCV-RNA negative 6 months after start of treatment, but therapy had to be withdrawn after 9 months owing to fatigue and suspicion of angina pectoris. One patient who was later retransplanted because of hepatic artery thrombosis discontinued therapy after 2.5 months owing to anemia, leukopenia, and no signs of HCV-RNA reduction. Interestingly, two of the responders were nonresponders prior to liver transplant. Median ALT levels at start of therapy were 98 U/L (r = 60-126) and 12 months later 40 U/L (r = 24-58) (n = 4). No rejection episode was detected. CONCLUSION: In patients liver-transplanted due to HCV-cirrhosis, combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin can be effective and safe in the early posttransplant period, thus preventing recurrent hepatitis C.

Current status of clinical islet transplantation.

Islet transplantation is currently being explored as a treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes. At present, the number of patients becoming insulin-independent is rapidly increasing world-wide applying the transplantation protocol originally described by the group in Edmonton. A hallmark in this procedure is repeated infusions of islets obtained from 2 to 4 donors until normoglycemia is achieved. In order to establish islet transplantation as a widely accepted treatment modality, and make tolerance induction regimes applicable, it is essential that the donor:recipient ratio is brought down to 1:1. A conceivable strategy to achieve this goal in clinical islet transplantation is discussed.

Key factors for human islet isolation and clinical transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To further improve the outcome of clinical islet transplantation analysis of the impact of donor- and process-related factors could be of great importance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive clinical islet transplantations were performed with consecutive islet isolations. Univariate analysis for donor- and isolation-related variables were correlated with recipient C-peptide levels at 2 and 4 weeks after transplantation. "Warm ischemia time" was defined as the time from start of University of Wisconsin solution perfusion in the donor until the pancreas was removed to the back table. RESULTS: Short "warm ischemia time" (WIT), low expression of tissue factor (TF) in pancreatic tissue, and high creatinine levels in the donor were variables related to high C-peptide values after islet transplantation. Furthermore, hospitalization length longer than 4 days was associated with low C-peptide levels. The number of islet equivalents (IEQ) did not correlate with the clinical outcome, possibly due to the fact that IEQ number was included in the release criteria for clinical islet transplantation CONCLUSIONS: Successful clinical islet transplantation is strongly correlated with donor and pancreas procurement factors rather than isolation process-related variables. "WIT" may induce TF expression in the pancreatic tissues. TF has been identified as the main trigger of the instant blood-mediated-inflammatory reaction in clinical islet transplantation. Therefore, assay of TF expression in pancreatic tissues could be applied as useful screening tool to identify "good" pancreata for clinical transplantation.

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a kidney transplant population: hereditary and sporadic forms.

Between 1985 and 1993, 16 of 1000 kidney transplant patients in Göteborg had biopsy-verified primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and among them they received 23 transplants. Their age range was 19-67 years (median 39 years). Patients were followed for 3-10 years (median 6.5 years). Eight patients were members of seven separate families in which at least one other member had FSGS, while eight cases were sporadic. The patients with hereditary FSGS were younger at onset of symptoms than sporadic cases (median 12.5 vs 26 years, P = 0.041) but not at the time of renal failure. Only one versus five had received immunotherapy. After transplantation, recurrence of FSGS occurred in five grafts, all in sporadic cases, and two of these were lost. In conclusion, it appears that there are at least two forms of FSGS, one hereditary and one sporadic form. The hereditary form does not seem to recur after transplantation, whereas the risk in sporadic cases is very high.

Rescue therapy with tacrolimus (FK 506) in renal transplant recipients--a Scandinavian multicenter analysis.

All renal allograft recipients (n = 32) in Sweden and Norway who were converted from cyclosporin (CyA)-based immunosuppression to FK 506 (tacrolimus) between October 1992 and June 1995 were analyzed retrospectively. The reasons for conversion were acute refractory rejection (n = 21), chronic rejection (n = 4), and suspected CyA toxicity (n = 6); one patient was converted for psychological reasons. The mean time from transplantation to conversion was 29 (range 1-243) weeks and there was a mean follow-up of 46 (2-143) weeks. Overall graft survival was 59%, with graft survival 52% in patients converted because of acute rejection, 50% in patients converted because of chronic rejection, and 83% in patients converted because of CyA toxicity. There was no significant correlation between preconversion serum creatinine and outcome. Seventy-two percent of the patients had significant side effects during FK 506 treatment, the most frequent ones being neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms. These improved after dose reduction. Two patients became overimmunosuppressed and developed lymphoma. One patient died of the primary kidney disease, hemolytic uraemic syndrome. We conclude that FK 506 therapy is able to salvage kidneys with acute refractory rejection and that it is an alternative in patients with CyA toxicity. However, the risk of overimmunosuppression must be considered.