Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Policy ; 130: 104720, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36801610

ABSTRACT

We provide evidence of geographical variations in the use of private health insurance (PHI) in Italy. Our study offers an original contribution, using a 2016 dataset on the use of PHI amongst a population of more than 200,000 employees of a major company. The average claim per enrolee was €925, representing approximately 50% of public health expenditure per capita, primarily for dental care (27.2%), specialist outpatient services (26.3%) and inpatient care (25.2%). Residents in northern regions and metropolitan areas respectively claimed reimbursements for €164 and €483 more than those in southern regions and in non-metropolitan areas. Both supply and demand factors can explain these large geographical differences. The study suggests the urgency for policymakers to address the considerable disparities in the Italian healthcare system, revealing the overall social, cultural and economic conditions that shape the demand for healthcare.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Insurance, Health , Humans , Health Expenditures , Geography , Italy/epidemiology
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35627428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are the most common class of complaints among patients presenting for care in the Emergency Department (ED). There is a non-urgent patient population with musculoskeletal complaints attending ED services that creates a burgeoning waiting list and contributes to overcrowding in Emergency Departments (EDs), which is a major concern worldwide. The recent (Coronavirus disease-19) COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented challenge that is revealing the structural and situational strengths and weaknesses of healthcare systems. METHODS: This study retrospectively and prospectively assessed patients presenting to the Emergency Department before and after the COVID-19 outbreak (from 21 February 2019 to 3 May 2019 and from 21 February 2020 to 3 May 2020) with non-traumatic or low-severity musculoskeletal conditions to test the hypothesis that these patients should have access to care outside the ED and that the COVID-19 outbreak has changed patients' care and health perception. RESULTS: A total of 613 patients were identified, and 542 of them (87.56%) participated in a personalized survey. From this number, 81.73% of the total accesses took place in 2019, and only 18.27% of the accesses took place during the first outbreak and lockdown. More than 90% of patients admitted to the ED accessed care during the day shift in both periods. A total of 87.30% of patients presenting to the ED with a MSKD followed their general practitioner's (GP) advice/referral in 2019, and 73.87% did so in 2020. The differences in the means of transport to the ED was statistically significant (p-value 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The outbreak and lockdown period confirmed that there is an inappropriate use of the ED related to patients with MSKD. However, the ED appears to be the only available solution for these patients. New services and pathways are therefore needed to enhance MSKD management and reduce ED crowding. Additional observational studies shall be developed to confirm and compare our findings with those of various EDs. The main limit of the inferential part of the study is probably due to the small sample of patients in 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
3.
Health Policy ; 119(3): 356-66, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25467792

ABSTRACT

Private health care expenditure ranges from 15% to 30% of total healthcare spending in OECD countries. The literature suggests that there should be an inverse correlation between quality of public services and private expenditures. The main objective of this study is to explore the association between quality of public healthcare and private expenditures in the Italian Regional Healthcare Systems (RHSs). The institutional framework offered by the Italian NHS allows to investigate on the differences among the regions while controlling for institutional factors. The study uses micro-data from the ISTAT Household Consumption Survey (HCS) and a rich set of regional quality indicators. The results indicate that there is a positive and significant correlation between quality and private spending per capita across regions. The study also points out the strong association between the distribution of private consumption and income. In order to account for the influence of income, the study segmented data in three socio-economic classes and computed cross-regional correlations of RHSs quality and household healthcare expenditure per capita, within each class. No correlation was found between the two variables. These findings are quite surprising and call into question the theory that better quality of public services crowds out private spending, or, at the very least, it undermines the simplistic notions that higher levels of private spending are a direct consequence of poor quality in the public sector. This suggests that policies should avoid to simplistically link private spending with judgements or assessments about the functioning or efficacy of the public system and its organizations.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Expenditures , Public Sector/economics , Quality of Health Care , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Financing, Personal/trends , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , National Health Programs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...