Canonical correlation analysis on the association between HIV-related stress and health-related quality of life among newly diagnosed people living with HIV.

The overall negative correlation between HIV-related stress and health related quality of life (HRQoL) among people living with HIV (PLWH) has been established, but less is known about the associations between them from various dimensions. We aimed to give a deep understanding of the relationship between these two multidimensional variables. A cross-sectional study of 557 PLWH with diagnosis less than 1 month was conducted. The HIV/AIDS Stress Scale (SS-HIV) and the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Survey (MOS-HIV) were used to assess the HIV-related stress and HRQoL, respectively. Canonical correlation analysis was performed to analyze their correlation. The association between HIV-related stress and HRQoL among PLWH was mainly determined by the emotional stress and four HRQoL dimensions including health transition, heath stress, mental health function and the attitude towards general quality of life, which should be taken as important considerations in the management of HIV.

Psychological Stress and Gender Differences during COVID-19 Pandemic in Chinese Population

About 83000 COVID-19 patients were confirmed in China up to May 2020. The effects of this public health crisis - and the varied efforts to contains its spread - have altered individuals "normal" daily functioning. This impact on social, psychological, and emotional well-being remain relatively unexplored, especially the ways in which Chinese men and women experience and respond to potential behavioral-related stressors. A cross-sectional study was conducted in late February 2020. Demographic characteristics and residential living conditions were measured along with psychological stress and behavior responses to the COVID-19 epidemic. 3088 questionnaires were received: 1749 females (56.6%) and 1339 males (43.4%). The mean level of stress, as measured by a visual analog scale, was 3.4 (SD=2.4) - but differed significantly by sex. Besides sex, factors positively associated with stress included: age ([≤]45 years), employment (unsteady income, unemployed), risk infection population (exposed to COVID-19, completed medical observation), difficulties encountered (diseases, work/study, financial, mental), behaviors(higher desire for COVID-19 knowledge, more time spent on the COVID-19). "Protective" factors included frequently contact with colleagues, calmness, and psychological resilience. Males and females also differed significantly in adapting to current living/working status, coping with heating, and psychological support service needs. Among Chinese, self-reported stress related to the COVID-19 epidemic were significantly related to sex, age, employment, resilience and coping styles. Future responses to such public health threats may wish to provide sex- and/or age-appropriate supports for psychological health and emotional well-being to those at greatest risk of experiencing stress.