ABSTRACT
Background: Healthcare workers (HCW) are at risk of getting infected with COVID-19 at work. To prevent such incidents and provide a safe environment in hospitals, comprehensive infection control strategies are necessary. We aimed to collect information on COVID-19 infection control strategies regarding personal protective equipment (PPE), regulations during breaks for HCW and dissemination of pandemic-related information. Methods: We invited infection control practitioners from 987 randomly selected German hospitals in March-April 2021 to participate in our cross-sectional online survey. We categorized the hospital based on bed capacity (≤499 beds = small; ≥500 beds = large). Fisher's exact test was performed and p < 0.05 defined as statistically significant. Findings: 100 participants completed the questionnaire. Small hospitals were more directive about requiring FFP2 respirators (63%), whereas larger hospitals more often gave their HCW a choice between these and medical masks (67%). For the care of COVID-19 and suspected COVID-19 cases, >90% of the participants recommended the use of gloves. Notably, gloves were recommended beyond COVID-19 in 30% of the hospitals. During meal breaks various strategies were followed. Conclusion: Recommendations for PPE varied across hospital sizes, which could be due to different assessments of necessity and safety. Regulations during breaks varied strongly which illustrates the need for clear official guidelines.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To reduce infections with Clostridioides difficile (CDI) in geriatric patients by interventions easily implementable in standard clinical care. METHODS: Prevalence and incidence of CDI between January 2015 and February 2020 were analysed (n = 25,311 patients). Pre-intervention status was assessed from April 2016 to March 2017 (n = 4,922). Between May 2017 and August 2019, a monocentric interventional crossover study (n = 4,655) was conducted including standard care and three interventions: (A) sporicidal cleaning of hospital wards, (B) probiotics and (C) improvement in personal hygiene for CDI patients. This was followed by a multicentric comparison of the interventional bundle (A + B + C) between September 2019 and February 2020 (n = 2,593) with the pre-intervention phase. In 98 CDI cases and matched controls individual risk factors for the development of CDI were compared. RESULTS: Time series analyses of CDI cases revealed a reduction in the prevalence of CDI in all three participating centres prior to the multicentric intervention phase. In the monocentric phase, no effect of individual interventions on CDI prevalence was identified. However, an aggregated analysis of CDI cases comparing the pre-intervention and the multicentric phase revealed a significant reduction in CDI prevalence. Risk factors for the development of CDI included use of antibiotics, anticoagulants, previous stay in long-term care facilities, prior hospital admissions, cardiac and renal failure, malnutrition and anaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction in CDI may be attributed to heightened awareness of the study objectives and specific staff training. Individual interventions did not appear to reduce CDI prevalence. A further randomised trial would be necessary to confirm whether the bundle of interventions is truly effective.
