Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hear Res ; 365: 62-76, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29778290

ABSTRACT

Despite the common use of guinea pigs in investigations of the neural mechanisms of binaural and spatial hearing, their behavioral capabilities in spatial hearing tasks have surprisingly not been thoroughly investigated. To begin to fill this void, we tested the spatial hearing of adult male guinea pigs in several experiments using a paradigm based on the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response. In the first experiment, we presented continuous broadband noise from one speaker location and switched to a second speaker location (the "prepulse") along the azimuth prior to presenting a brief, ∼110 dB SPL startle-eliciting stimulus. We found that the startle response amplitude was systematically reduced for larger changes in speaker swap angle (i.e., greater PPI), indicating that using the speaker "swap" paradigm is sufficient to assess stimulus detection of spatially separated sounds. In a second set of experiments, we swapped low- and high-pass noise across the midline to estimate their ability to utilize interaural time- and level-difference cues, respectively. The results reveal that guinea pigs can utilize both binaural cues to discriminate azimuthal sound sources. A third set of experiments examined spatial release from masking using a continuous broadband noise masker and a broadband chirp signal, both presented concurrently at various speaker locations. In general, animals displayed an increase in startle amplitude (i.e., lower PPI) when the masker was presented at speaker locations near that of the chirp signal, and reduced startle amplitudes (increased PPI) indicating lower detection thresholds when the noise was presented from more distant speaker locations. In summary, these results indicate that guinea pigs can: 1) discriminate changes in source location within a hemifield as well as across the midline, 2) discriminate sources of low- and high-pass sounds, demonstrating that they can effectively utilize both low-frequency interaural time and high-frequency level difference sound localization cues, and 3) utilize spatial release from masking to discriminate sound sources. This report confirms the guinea pig as a suitable spatial hearing model and reinforces prior estimates of guinea pig hearing ability from acoustical and physiological measurements.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiology , Behavior, Animal , Cues , Hearing , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Sound Localization , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Discrimination, Psychological , Guinea Pigs , Male , Prepulse Inhibition , Reflex, Startle , Time Factors
2.
Ear Hear ; 37(5): e291-301, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27232069

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The binaural interaction component (BIC) is the residual auditory brainstem response (ABR) obtained after subtracting the sum of monaurally evoked from binaurally evoked ABRs. The DN1 peak-the first negative peak of the BIC-has been postulated to have diagnostic value as a biomarker for binaural hearing abilities. Indeed, not only do DN1 amplitudes depend systematically upon binaural cues to location (interaural time and level differences), but they are also predictive of central hearing deficits in humans. A prominent issue in using BIC measures as a diagnostic biomarker is that DN1 amplitudes not only exhibit considerable variability across subjects, but also within subjects across different measurement sessions. DESIGN: In this study, the authors investigate the DN1 amplitude measurement reliability by conducting repeated measurements on different days in eight adult guinea pigs. RESULTS: Despite consistent ABR thresholds, ABR and DN1 amplitudes varied between and within subjects across recording sessions. However, the study analysis reveals that DN1 amplitudes varied proportionally with parent monaural ABR amplitudes, suggesting that common experimental factors likely account for the variability in both waveforms. Despite this variability, the authors show that the shape of the dependence between DN1 amplitude and interaural time difference is preserved. The authors then provide a BIC normalization strategy using monaural ABR amplitude that reduces the variability of DN1 peak measurements. Finally, the authors evaluate this normalization strategy in the context of detecting changes of the DN1 amplitude-to-interaural time difference relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the BIC measurement variability can be reduced by a factor of two by performing a simple and objective normalization operation. The authors discuss the potential for this normalized BIC measure as a biomarker for binaural hearing.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Guinea Pigs , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Ear Hear ; 37(5): e276-e290, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27232077

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a sound-evoked noninvasively measured electrical potential representing the sum of neuronal activity in the auditory brainstem and midbrain. ABR peak amplitudes and latencies are widely used in human and animal auditory research and for clinical screening. The binaural interaction component (BIC) of the ABR stands for the difference between the sum of the monaural ABRs and the ABR obtained with binaural stimulation. The BIC comprises a series of distinct waves, the largest of which (DN1) has been used for evaluating binaural hearing in both normal hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Based on data from animal and human studies, the authors discuss the possible anatomical and physiological bases of the BIC (DN1 in particular). The effects of electrode placement and stimulus characteristics on the binaurally evoked ABR are evaluated. The authors review how interaural time and intensity differences affect the BIC and, analyzing these dependencies, draw conclusion about the mechanism underlying the generation of the BIC. Finally, the utility of the BIC for clinical diagnoses are summarized.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Electrodes , Humans
4.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 131(1): 27-35, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20873999

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSION: After initial contact of the active middle ear implant (AMEI) on the incus, significant increases in device performance can be achieved intraoperatively without affecting residual hearing by additional static loading of the incus with 62 µm (quarter turn) to 125 µm (half turn) increments via an adjustment screw. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance gains of driving the incus with an AMEI under increasing static loads in cadaveric temporal bones. METHODS: Incus drive efficacy was assessed using laser Doppler velocimetry measurements of stapes velocities over a frequency range of 0.25 to 8 kHz. Results were compared to stapes velocities following acoustic stimulation via insert earphone. Maximum equivalent ear canal sound pressure level (L(Emax)) and residual hearing loss after initial loading of the AMEI (first contact) were compared in each temporal bone. Additional increases in incus load were induced by turning an adjustment screw in quarter turn steps, corresponding to 62 µm increments per step. L(Emax)and residual hearing loss were reassessed after each step. For each temporal bone, experiments were repeated for three different AMEIs. RESULTS: On average across bones, incus stimulation upon initial contact produced an L(Emax)of 125, 127, and 121 dB SPL and residual hearing losses of -2, -1, and -1 dB with respect to unloaded, unaided conditions for the three AMEIs, respectively. Across bones and transducers, increasing static transducer load by incrementing the AMEI up to 125 µm significantly improved performance without affecting residual hearing loss. Loading beyond 125 µm (half turn) did not improve performance but significantly increased residual hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Ossicular Replacement/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Incus/surgery , Microsurgery/methods , Ossicular Prosthesis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...