Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study.

BACKGROUND: 3-year subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SIT) in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis reduced the risk of developing asthma during treatment and 2 years after discontinuation of SIT (5-year follow-up) indicating long-term preventive effect of SIT. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term clinical effect and the preventive effect of developing asthma 7-years after termination of SIT. METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven subjects, aged 16-25 years with grass and/or birch pollen allergy was investigated 10 years after initiation of a 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts of grass and/or birch or no SIT respectively. Conjunctival provocations were performed outside the season and methacholine bronchial provocations were performed during the season and winter. Asthma was assessed by clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The significant improvements in rhinoconjunctivitis and conjunctival sensitivity persisted at the 10-year follow-up. Significantly less actively treated subjects had developed asthma at 10-year follow-up as evaluated by clinical symptoms [odds ratio 2.5 (1.1-5.9)]. Patients who developed asthma among controls were 24/53 and in the SIT group 16/64. The longitudinal treatment effect when adjusted for bronchial hyper-responsiveness and asthma status at baseline including all observations at 3, 5 and 10 years follow-up (children with or without asthma at baseline, n = 189; 511 observations) was statistically significant (P = 0.0075). The odds ratio for no-asthma was 4.6 95% CI (1.5-13.7) in favor of SIT. CONCLUSION: A 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts has shown long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Specific immunotherapy has long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhino conjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment termination.

Five-year follow-up on the PAT study: specific immunotherapy and long-term prevention of asthma in children.

BACKGROUND: A 3-year course of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in children with hay fever to grass and/or birch pollen significantly reduced the risk of developing asthma. To investigate the long-term preventive effect, we performed a follow up--2 years after termination of immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 183 children, aged 6-14 years with grass and/or birch pollen allergy could be investigated 2 years after discontinuation of SIT or no treatment. Conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs) and methacholine bronchial provocation tests were carried out during the season and winter after 5 years. The development of asthma was assessed by clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The significant improvement in hay fever and CPT results observed after 3 years of SIT persisted at the 5-year follow-up. No difference in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was found after 5 years because of spontaneous improvement during the follow-up period in the control patients. The immunotherapy-treated children had significantly less asthma after 5 years as evaluated by clinical symptoms [odds ratio 2.68 (1.3-5.7)] in favor of SIT for prevention of development of asthma and significantly less patients reported an increase in asthma scores (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy for 3 years with standardized allergen extracts of grass and/or birch shows long-term clinical effect and preventive effect on development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis.

Seasonal differences of peak expiratory flow rate variability and mediators of allergic inflammation in non-atopic adolescents.

Variations in peak expiratory flow (PEF) and serum eosinophil mediators were studied in healthy adolescents. Twenty-five boys and 31 girls, 11-16 years of age (mean age 14.3 years), were selected and investigated during the birch pollen season of 1995; 45 were also investigated during the autumn of the same year. The PEF was measured twice daily and eosinophil mediators in serum and in urine were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) once during the birch pollen season and once in autumn. The type values of the daily PEF variation, expressed in amplitude percentage mean, were 6.4 and 3.9%, mean values were 7.35 and 6.74%, and the 95th percentiles were 18 and 14%, during the birch pollen season and autumn, respectively. The 95th percentiles were 41 and 38 microg/l for serum eosinophil cationic protein (s-ECP), 74 and 62 microg/l for serum eosinophil protein X (s-EPX), 987 and 569 microg/l for serum myeloperoxidase (s-MPO), and 165 and 104 microg/mmol for urinary eosinophil protein X/urinary creatinine (u-EPX/u-creatinine), during the birch pollen season and autumn, respectively. The levels of the eosinophil mediators decreased significantly from May (n = 56) to November (n = 45), for s-ECP from a median value of 14 microg/l to 7 microg/l (p= 0.001), for s-EPX from a median value of 28 microg/l to 20 microg/l (p= 0.001), and for the neutrophil mediator, s-MPO, from a median value of 440 g/l to 292 g/l (p< 0.001). The PEF variability decreased significantly (p= 0.037), from spring (n = 55; median 8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-10.19) to autumn (n = 44; median 6%, 95% CI 6.1-8.9). A significant correlation was found between the levels of s-ECP and s-EPX (rs = 0.7, p< 0.001), between s-ECP and s-MPO (rs = 0.6, p< 0.001), between s-EPX and s-MPO (rs = 0.4, p< 0.005), and between s-EPX and u-EPX/u-creatinine (rs = 0.6, p< 0.0001), in the birch pollen season (n = 56) and in the autumn (n = 45). There was a positive correlation found in PEF variability between the two seasons (n = 43; rs = 0.5, p= 0.0006). No other correlation was found between PEF variability and any other parameters. The difference in the levels of eosinophil mediators between seasons in non-atopic, healthy children is unexplained. Normal limits for mediators were higher and PEF variability was almost the same as has been reported in adults. When using normal values, seasonal influences should be considered.

Asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity and mediator release in children with birch pollinosis. ECP and EPX levels are not related to bronchial hyperreactivity.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of allergic asthma are triggered by allergen exposure inducing allergic inflammation and hyperreactivity of the bronchi. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible relationship between clinical symptoms and signs of asthma, i.e. bronchial variability as measured by peak expiatory flow rate (PEFR), bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and mediators of allergic inflammation. METHODS: Twenty-eight children with pollinosis, but no obvious history of asthma, were studied at three occasions, i.e. before, during and after (autumn) the birch pollen season. Twelve children sensitive to birch pollen were considered as the case group. Sixteen children, who were only clinically sensitive to grass pollen, served as controls. Subjective symptoms of asthma were recorded by visual analogue scale, BHR was estimated by methacholine bronchial provocation tests, bronchial variability PEFR and circulating mediators of inflammation, i.e. eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil protein X, myeloperoxidase and tryptase in serum. RESULTS: Bronchial hyperreactivity and by PEFR was more pronounced after than during the season (P < 0.01), whereas eosinophil mediators and the peak expiratory flow rate increased during the season (P < 0.05). Except for between PEFR variability and BHR in the autumn (r = 0.45; P = 0.014), no correlations were found. However, in the autumn, the majority of children were still hyperreactive in the bronchi and showed PEFR variability but the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum had returned to normal levels. CONCLUSION: Signs and symptoms of asthma did not correlate with serum levels of mediators of allergic inflammation. Bronchial hyperreactivity and PEFR variability persisted after the pollen season when signs of bronchial inflammation had disappeared. We hypothesize that eosinophil mediators and other markers of allergic inflammation disappear after the late-phase reaction, whereas BHR persists. This would explain the lack of correlation between the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum and symptoms of asthma and BHR.