Attitude toward perioperative safety among operation room clinicians at Ethiopian University Hospital.

Patient safety is a fundamental of good quality and also a high priority for the health-care system. Maintaining patient safety reduces errors and harm that patients can suffer during health care. The operating room clinicians have a vital role in ensuring patient safety. The general objective of this study was to assess attitudes towards perioperative safety and associated factors among the operation room clinicians at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH), Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. A cross-sectional study was conducted on operation room clinicians at UoGCSH. The data were collected by using a self-administered structured questionnaire that included the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ). Binary logistic regression analysis was employed, and the strength of association was described in adjusted odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 260 (76% response rate) operation room clinicians have participated in this study. The mean ± SD of attitude toward perioperative safety was 57.8 ± 0.9. Only 32 (12.3%) operation room clinicians have shown a favorable attitude toward perioperative safety. Most of the clinicians were found to have unfavorable attitudes toward all domains of SAQ except the stress recognition domain. Age >30 years [adjusted odds ratios (AOR): 3.1, CI: 1.1, 8.7, P = .035], working for ≥40 h/week (AOR: 3.9, CI: 1.4, 11.1, P = .01), working in ophthalmologic (AOR: 12.0, CI: 3.8, 38.8, P < .001) and gynecologic (AOR: 3.6, CI: 1.1, 12.7, P = .04) operation rooms, and having training on perioperative safety (AOR: 2.6, CI: 1.1, 6.5, P < .03) were found associated with having favorable attitude toward perioperative safety. Most operation room clinicians had an unfavorable attitude toward perioperative safety and all the domains of SAQ except the stress recognition domain. Older age ≥ 30 years, working for ≥40 h/week, having safety-related training, and working in ophthalmologic and gynecologic operation rooms were found associated with having a favorable attitude toward perioperative safety.

Simulation-based perioperative anaesthesia information management practice: cross-sectional study.

Perioperative anaesthesia record completeness is very essential skill of the anaesthesia profession at the time of operation in the health setting. During perioperative, anaesthesia care sometimes there may be missing important information of the patient, medication taken or planned. This study aimed to improve perioperative anaesthesia information management practice. Methodology: Pre-interventional and post-interventional cross-sectional study was conducted from 21 June to 25 July 2022 on 164 anaesthesia record filled by 51 anaesthesia care provider in pre-interventional and post-interventional phase. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and the data entered by Epi-data software (version 4.6) and analyzed by using SPSS version 26. For all indicators, the projected completion rate was 100%. Indicators with completion rates of greater than 90% were classified as acceptable, while those with completion rates of 50% were seen as urgently needing improvement. Results: Pre-interventional result: among all indicators, none of the indicators had 100%, completeness rate. Postoperative nausea and vomiting management orders, the names of the surgeon and anaesthetist, the location of the intravenous cannula, the maintenance of anaesthesia, the total amount of fluid supplied, the content of the consent discussion, and null per ose status, age, and weight of the patient were some of the markers that were identified below average (50%) and in need of significant improvement. Post-interventional result: when compared with the pre-interventional result, their documentation skills were improving after discussions with stakeholders and the relevant bodies; however, none of the indicators attained 100% completion rate. Conclusion and recommendation: Even after the interventions, the desired completion rate was not attained. As a result, it requires ongoing instruction on perioperative anaesthesia information management according to the standard perspectives.

Maternal satisfaction and practice of preoperative anaesthesia evaluation among pregnant who underwent elective caesarean section, cross-sectional study.

Background: Preoperative anesthesia evaluation is beginning of all anesthesia care. It enables the anesthetists to know general health status of parturient, choose of anesthesia options and discuss the possible complication regarding perioperative anesthesia care. It also creates chance for parturient to know the anesthetist, about anesthesia type as well as possible anesthesia care related complications. Objective: To assess maternal satisfaction with the practice of preoperative anesthesia evaluation among patients underwent elective cesarean delivery. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study design conducted from March 1to April 30, 2021. All consecutive parturient that were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under anesthesia during the study period were interviewed postoperatively after 24 h using semi structure questioner. A checklists, which developed based on the hospital's anesthetic evaluation sheet and Royal Collage of Anesthetist standards (RCOA) were used for data collection. Data were entered in SPSS version 20 and both descriptive and analytic statics analysis were performed. Result: A total of 157 elective patients undergoing elective cesarean section were included with response rate of 96.9%. All patients (100%) were evaluated in the preoperative period. However, 53(33.8%) of patients were receiving information regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting during the preoperative period compared to the standards. Educational level of the anesthetist, fasting instruction, information regarding PONV and information regarding type of anesthesia were significantly associated with overall maternal satisfaction to current practice of preoperative anesthesia evaluation. Conclusion and recommendation: The practice of delivering important information's to parturient during the preoperative anesthesia evaluation was low compared to the standard. Therefore, we recommend anesthesia professionals to give detail explanation regarding the post-operative pain management option, possible inevitable complications and proper rapport with the clients.

The magnitude and associated factors of post-operative pain among adult patients.

Background: Postoperative pain continues to be a serious consequence of surgical intervention. Several factors may contribute to the development of postoperative pain; these could be preoperative factors, demographic factors, anesthetic factors, and surgical factors. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and factors associated with postoperative pain among surgical patients. Methods: An institutional-based prospective longitudinal study included 265 postoperative patients from the surgical wards of Gambella General Hospital from April 15, 2021, to June 30, 2021. A consecutive sampling technique was used to recruit study participants. The patients were followed up for 24 h postoperatively. A numerical rating scale (NRS-11) is used for the assessment of pain. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 25. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the association between dependent and independent variables with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 270 data points were collected. Of these, a total of 265 with a 98.1% response rate were analyzed. The incidence of postoperative pain was 69%, 74%, and 77.0% at 2 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. The following factors were strongly associated with the dependent variable: patient age, 18-45 years old [AOR = 2.8; (95%CI: 1.13, 6.74, p = 0.026)], skin incision length, 10 cm [AOR = 2.5; (95%CI: 1.30, 5.13, p = 0.007)], preoperative pain [AOR = 2.4, (95%CI: 1.02, 5.60, p = 0.045)], and surgeon experience [AOR = 2.1, (95%CI. Conclusion: and Recommendation: In the current study the magnitude of postoperative pain was high, 220 patients were complaining POP (83%). Age of the patient, length of skin incision, preoperative pain, and experience of surgeons were the independent associated factors for the experience of postoperative pain. Preoperative pain management should exercise among adult surgical patients in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, and the length of surgical skin incisions should be minimized.

Emergency nurses perceived barriers to effective pain management at emergency department in Amhara region referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Multi-center cross sectional study.

Background: Quality of pain management in emergency departments may be affected by nurses' perceived barriers. Poorly managed pain may lead to altered physiological and psychological function which affect patients' quality of life as well as increase costs to the health care system. Objective: This study aimed to assess emergency nurse's perceived barriers to pain management and associated factors at emergency departments, 2021. Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted with 153 nurses from eight emergency departments from May1-May 30, 2021 with semi-structured questionnaire. All volunteer nurses were included. Epi-info version 7 and SPSS version 20.0 were used for data entry and analysis respectively. We used descriptive statistics to report results of the study in the form of text and table. Student t-test, one way ANOVA and Post hoc test were applied to assess relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the participants with perceived barriers. Result: Of the 20 items, overcrowding 3.24 ± 0.9, nursing workload 3.16 ± 1.03, and lack of pain management guidelines/protocol2.5 ± 1.15 were the highest reported barriers to pain management at an emergency department. In addition, years of work experience as emergency nurses≤1 (p-value = 0.01), BSC level of education (p-value = 0.04), married (p-value = 0.04) and frequency of training ≤ (p-value = 0.02) were significantly associated with nurses perceived barriers on pain management. Conclusion: and Recommendation: Overcrowding, nurses' workload, absence of pain management tool, year of experience as emergency nurse ≤1, married, BSC nurses and frequency of training≤1 were the perceived barriers to pain management in the emergency department. The stakeholders in each facility should make an effort to increase the ratio of nurses to emergency patients. Professionals should develop local pain assessment and management protocol. Training should be given regularly and the opportunity of education should be maximized.

Assessment of post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis usage for cesarean section, 2021: A cross sectional study.

Background: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing to patients. This common anesthetic and surgical side effect has been reported to increase patient dissatisfaction and can be more distressing to patients than post-operative pain. It has multi-factorial causes: patient, anesthesia and surgery related risk factors have been identified. Prevention of PONV is important since it has psychological and physical effects, and it can also cause severe complications. Objective: To determine the level of practice of PONV prophylaxis usage for caesarean section. Methods: This clinical perspective study was conducted at all pregnant mothers scheduled for caesarean section under anesthesia from March 1 to March 30, 2021 consecutively. The standards were directly changed into question forms with two integral checking components, "Yes", and "No". Data were entered and analyzed by statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results: A total of 100 parturients scheduled for caesarean section were included with a response rate of 100%. Based on the standards, Anti-emetic treatment to patients with post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), adherence of anesthetists to local evidence based guideline for PONV prevention and more importantly no prophylactic administration to patients at low risk for PONV were implemented with a percentage of 17%,47%, and 14% respectively. Conclusions: and recommendations: There was a significant performance gap in the clinical practice of prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting. We strongly suggest that adherence to a Protocol to reduce baseline risk and the adoption of a multimodal approach will highly likely ensure success in the management of PONV. The usage of appropriate anti-emetic prophylaxis to the right patient is necessary to have a good outcome after surgery and anesthesia.

"Prevalence and associated factors of preoperative anxiety among obstetric patients who underwent cesarean section": A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is the most common problem in the preoperative period. This anxiety increases postoperative pain, delay healing, and prolong the hospital stay. Among the surgical population, a higher level of preoperative anxiety has been seen in obstetric patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of preoperative anxiety among obstetric patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January 01, 2021, to May 30, 2021. A total of 376 obstetric patients who underwent cesarean sections were included. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabs, and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the association shivering and independent variables. The strength of the association was presented using an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant state versions of state-trait anxiety inventory scale (S-STAI) were used for this study. RESULTS: The overall prevalence rate of preoperative anxiety was 63% (95% CI: 58.2, 68.1). The patient's preoperative mean anxiety score of STAI was (43.81 ± 8.81). There was a high level of preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing emergency cesarean section as compared to elective patients. Patients' age less than 30 years, level of education, and previous anesthesia and surgery exposure were also highly associated with the dependent variable. CONCLUSION: In this study, fear of complications and fear of death result of operation were the most common factors responsible for preoperative anxiety while few patients were anxious about financial loss and osmotic issues.

Analgesic efficacy of posterior and anterior psoas compartment block: Lumbar plexus versus three -in-one nerve block after lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia: A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain is the most common complaint in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery. Regarding with the severity of pain, orthopedic patients suffered more than non-orthopedic patients in the immediate post-operative period. Therefore, pain management is crucial for better patient outcome. Lumbar plexus (LB) and three -in-one (3IN1) nerve blocks have been routinely practiced as pain management techniques in the study area but the analgesic efficacy was not studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the LBP versus 3IN1B as postoperative pain management after thigh orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. METHOD: An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted from October 10, 2020 to March 30, 2021 at the University comprehensive specialized hospital. Non-probability convenient sampling was used to select participants in both groups. The time to first analgesic request, severity of pain and total analgesia consumption within the first postoperative 24 h were measured. RESULT: The mean and standard deviation to seek the first analgesia request time was 11. 55 ± 2. 82hr and 13. 35 ± 2. 58hr (p- 0.07) in patients who received LPB and 3IN1B respectively. Pain severity at rest and on movement was also comparable. The total tramadol consumption was 67. 65 ± 27. 20 mg and 70. 59 ± 37. 19 mg (p- 0.71), while total Diclofenac consumption was 63. 23 ± 45. 74 mg and 44. 88 ± 34. 72 mg (p-0.07) in LPB and 3IN1B groups respectively. CONCLUSION: The study showed that there was no significant difference in the time to first analgesia request, postoperative pain, both at rest and movement and total analgesic consumption, between the LPB and 3IN1B.

"The magnitude and associated factors of intraoperative shivering after cesarean section delivery under Spinal anesthesia'': A cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Shivering is an involuntary, spontaneous, and repetitive contraction of the skeletal muscle and increases patients' discomfort, oxygen-consuming, wound infection; increased surgical bleeding, and morbid cardiac events. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude and associated factors of intraoperative shivering after cesarean section delivery. METHODOLOGY: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 326 willing patients were included in the study after obtaining ethical consent and we have used consecutive sampling techniques. Axillary temperature was recorded preoperatively and in the intra-operative period every 5 min. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabs, and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the association shivering and independent variables. The strength of the association was presented using an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall incidence of intraoperative shivering after cesarean section delivery under spinal anesthesia was 51.8% (95% CI: 46.3, 57.1). The majority of the patients who developed shivering were after 20 min of spinal anesthesia. In this study body temperature, mean arterial pressure of the patient, and duration of surgery were significantly associated with shivering. CONCLUSION: In this study duration of surgery, hypothermia and hypotension were the independent associated risk factors for intraoperative shivering.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Back Pain among Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia: An Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Back pain is often reported as a common complaint after surgery. Many studies showed that the prevalence of back pain after spinal anesthesia is high and its magnitude is considerable in developing countries. It is highly related to reduced quality of life, loss of work productivity, burden of health care costs, and satisfaction regarding health care service; therefore, measures should be taken to reduce or prevented postspinal back. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence and factors associated with back pain among patients undergoing spinal anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Methodology. An institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to May 2020. A total of 215 participants were enrolled in this study. A convenience sampling technique was used to get the study participants. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with postspinal back pain. Variables with a p value less than <0.2 in the bivariable analysis were fitted into the multivariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis, a variable with a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of postspinal back pain was 40.5% (95% CI: 34.0, 47.4). Being overweight (AOR = 3.8; 95% CI: 1.47, 9.96) and obese (AOR = 4.9; 95% CI: 1.19, 20.4), using big spinal needles (AOR = 5.9; 95% CI: 1.04, 33.4), two attempts of lumbar puncture (AOR = 5.5; 95% CI: 1.74, 17.59), more than three attempts of lumbar puncture (AOR = 4.9; 95% CI: 1.63, 15.2), and the number of bone contacts during spinal anesthesia procedure (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.14, 8.45) were positively associated with postspinal back pain. Conclusion and Recommendation. The overall incidence of back pain is high. Body mass index, size of spinal needle, number of attempts, and number of bone contacts are significantly associated with the incidence of back pain following spinal anesthesia. Thus, it is better to minimize the number of lumbar puncture attempts and bone contacts during spinal anesthesia to reduce postspinal back pain. In addition, using smaller size spinal needle is a good choice.