Adjunct Preceptor Perceptions of Motivation, Understanding, and Support for the Precepting Role.

OBJECTIVE: To determine adjunct pharmacist preceptor perceptions of their precepting role related to three domains: motivation to precept, understanding the precepting role, and support for precepting. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey of 2429 adjunct preceptors for four schools of pharmacy was conducted. Participants ranked their agreement with 81 statements regarding the three domains, including eleven subdomains. RESULTS: Mean scores for the three domains were slightly below the positive response level, with lower scores found for the subdomains of workload, precepting norms, and extrinsic benefits/rewards. Individual statements indicated increased workload due to precepting, need for more preceptor recognition and appreciation, perceptions that precepting was stressful or draining, and a preference for one concurrent learner. More frequent need for extra coaching for APPE students negatively impacted all domains, including nine subdomains. CONCLUSION: This study provides a formal evaluation of adjunct preceptor perceptions of their precepting role. Compared to previous studies, these results may indicate lower satisfaction with precepting, suggesting opportunities exist to improve the adjunct precepting experience. Actions by schools/colleges of pharmacy are necessary to ensure experiential education capacity including addressing workload concerns, increasing preceptor recognition and appreciation, and supporting preceptors when students need extra coaching.

Student pharmacists delivering academic detailing on adult pneumococcal vaccination to community pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Academic detailing is an educational outreach approach to disseminate evidence-based information to health care professionals and improve clinical decision making. Pharmacists and physicians are recognized as the most qualified individuals to perform academic detailing; however, trained student pharmacists may also serve as suitable academic detailers. OBJECTIVES: To describe our academic detailing intervention that used trained student pharmacists to disseminate an updated pneumococcal vaccination clinical pathway (i.e., decision-support tool) and education to community pharmacists in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. METHODS: We updated an academic detailing initiative that included a pneumococcal vaccination clinical pathway and education for community pharmacists in 2021. Two University of Rhode Island (URI) College of Pharmacy pharmacist faculty members trained 6 student pharmacists to perform academic detailing. Student pharmacists visited URI-affiliated community pharmacies throughout Rhode Island and Massachusetts. After each session, each participant received a 6-question anonymous paper survey to assess the effectiveness of the updated pathway and academic detailing session. The survey used a 5-point Likert-type scale. We assessed the percentage agreement with each question. RESULTS: Academic detailing was delivered to 76 community pharmacists from May to August 2021. Most respondents agreed (89.2%, 58/65) that their knowledge of which patient populations met eligibility for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine improved. Respondents were confident they could apply the knowledge gained (93.8%, 61/65) and intended to apply the pathway (93.8%, 61/65) to clinical practice. Most respondents expected vaccination practices to change because of the academic detailing and education materials received (83.6%, 51/61). Almost all respondents (95.4%, 62/65) found the educational materials easy to understand. CONCLUSION: Trained student pharmacists can deliver academic detailing regarding adult pneumococcal vaccination to community pharmacists. Enlisting the help of student pharmacists may be a sustainable approach to academic detailing and provides students with valuable opportunities to practice delivering educational outreach to community pharmacists.

Frequency of essential elements in required advanced pharmacy practice experiences (FEER - APPE).

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated student reported achievement of essential elements (EE) across three required advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) to identify differences in the frequency of each EE during different delivery modalities. METHODS: APPE students from three different programs were assigned a self-assessment EE inventory after required acute care, ambulatory care, and community pharmacy APPEs between May 2018 and December 2020. Using a four-point frequency scale, students reported exposure to and completion of each EE. Pooled data were analyzed to compare differences in frequencies of EE during standard and disrupted delivery. All standard delivery APPEs were in-person, but during the study period APPEs shifted to a disrupted delivery using hybrid and remote formats. Frequency changes were reported as combined data and compared between programs. RESULTS: A total of 2191 of 2259 (97%) evaluations were completed. Acute care APPEs had a statistically significant change in frequency of evidence-based medicine elements. Ambulatory care APPEs had a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of reported pharmacist patient care elements. Community pharmacy had a statistically significant decrease in frequency in each category of EE except practice management. Statistically significant differences between programs were observed for select EEs. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of EE completion during disrupted APPEs revealed minimal change. Acute care was the least impacted whereas community APPEs experienced the greatest change. This may be attributable to shifts in direct patient interactions during the disruption. Ambulatory care was impacted to a lesser degree, potentially due to utilization of telehealth communications.

Incorporating a learning unit on vaccine hesitancy into a first-year doctor of pharmacy immunization course.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy is a growing threat to public health. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of incorporating a learning unit on addressing vaccine hesitancy into a doctor of pharmacy immunization delivery course. METHODS: The learning unit, implemented fall 2019 at the University of Rhode Island, involved two interactive lectures and an at-home assignment. A family medicine physician spoke about her experiences with vaccine-hesitant families, and students viewed video scenarios depicting a pharmacist talking with vaccine-hesitant patients followed by an in-class discussion. Data was collected using pre- and post-surveys and a one-year follow-up survey. RESULTS: Out of 125 students enrolled in the course, 121 completed the pre-survey, 113 the post-survey, and 120 the follow-up survey. For pre-/post-survey comparison questions, statistically significant improvements were seen in 9 of 13 items. The follow-up survey showed 83.4% of students had applied knowledge and 85.7% had applied skills gained from the learning unit. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a learning unit on addressing vaccine hesitancy into a pharmacy immunization class resulted in improvements in student self-reported knowledge and comfort in talking with patients who are vaccine hesitant. Long-term use of self-reported knowledge and skills gained was seen one-year post-implementation.

Assessing experiential education factors contributing to a PGY1 residency match: Pharmacy residency program director and comparative student survey.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast experiential education perceptions of pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) and doctor of pharmacy students in their last year of the curriculum for residency application considerations. METHODS: The New England Regional Departments of Experiential Education (NERDEE) consortium developed a 17-question survey to assess residency factors, including those related to experiential education. The survey was dispersed to advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) students from six colleges/schools of pharmacy and RPDs nationwide. RESULTS: Students have different values on experiential preferences compared to RPDs. Sample findings include internal medicine and specialty clinical elective experiences prior to American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Midyear were extremely important to important for students, while RPDs viewed these experiences as somewhat important at best (p < 0.02). The majority of RPDs (67%) have no APPE schedule preference, while most students (77%) feel that certain APPE schedules may influence acceptance into residency. CONCLUSION: Based on findings, information outlined can be used to dispel and/or validate common beliefs held by students regarding experiential factors that help or hinder a successful postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residency match.

Pharmacist-based intervention to prepare residents of assisted-living facilities for emergencies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess views of disaster preparation and readiness of assisted-living residents after a comprehensive program developed and presented by pharmacists on the importance of preparing for an emergency, specifically regarding organizing of medical information. METHODS: Four assisted-living facilities were identified throughout Rhode Island to participate in a 30-minute program conducted by two pharmacists who were involved in disaster preparedness on both a national and state level. A survey assessed the participants' possession of a disaster kit, medical form, and personal plan, as well as their knowledge of their facilities' possession of a kit, form, and plan. Participants were also surveyed on their attitudes regarding current preparedness and on the disasters (e.g, hurricanes, bioterrorism, avian influenza, floods, fire) about which they were most concerned before the program began. Student pharmacists and faculty assisted residents in the completion of the survey. At the conclusion of the program, all participants were asked to retake the survey to assess the impact of the program. RESULTS: 58 preprogram and 42 postprogram surveys were returned anonymously. A statistically significant change in preparedness was observed for hurricane, avian influenza, bioterrorism, and flood, and a statistically significant change in concern was seen for avian influenza and bioterrorism. CONCLUSION: Elderly assisted-living residents are at increased risk of adverse effects in disasters; however, this growing population lacks baseline preparedness items such as a simple emergency preparedness kit. Educational programs by pharmacists can increase levels of preparedness for and defuse concerns about disasters in this population. Pharmacists also can educate elderly patients about preparedness for potential disasters specific to their location.