ABSTRACT
Objective: Gait dysfunction is one of the most difficult motor signs to treat in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Understanding its pathophysiology and developing more effective therapies for parkinsonian gait dysfunction will require preclinical studies that can quantitatively and objectively assess the spatial and temporal features of gait. Design: We developed a novel system for measuring volitional, naturalistic gait patterns in non-human primates, and then applied the approach to characterize the progression of parkinsonian gait dysfunction across a sequence of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) treatments that allowed for intrasubject comparisons across mild, moderate, and severe stages. Results: Parkinsonian gait dysfunction was characterized across treatment levels by a slower stride speed, increased time in both the stance and swing phase of the stride cycle, and decreased cadence that progressively worsened with overall parkinsonian severity. In contrast, decreased stride length occurred most notably in the moderate to severe parkinsonian state. Conclusion: The results suggest that mild parkinsonism in the primate model of PD starts with temporal gait deficits, whereas spatial gait deficits manifest after reaching a more severe parkinsonian state overall. This study provides important context for preclinical studies in non-human primates studying the neurophysiology of and treatments for parkinsonian gait.
ABSTRACT
Rigidity of upper and lower limbs in Parkinson's disease (PD) is typically assessed via a clinical rating scale that is subject to human perception biases. Methodologies to quantify changes in rigidity associated with the angular position (stiffness) or velocity (viscous damping) are needed to enhance our understanding of PD pathophysiology and objectively assess therapies. In this proof of concept study, we developed a robotic system and a model-based approach to estimate viscous damping and stiffness of the elbow. Our methodology enables the subject to freely rotate the elbow using an admittance controller while torque perturbations tailored to identify the arm dynamics are delivered. The viscosity and stiffness are calculated based on the experimental data using least-squares estimation. We validated our technique using computer simulations and experiments with a nonhuman animal model of PD in the presence and absence of deep brain stimulation therapy. Our data show that stiffness and viscosity measurements can better differentiate rigidity changes than scores previously used for research, including the work and impulse scores, and the modified unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. Our estimation method is suitable for quantifying the effect of therapies on viscous damping and stiffness and studying the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying rigidity in PD.
ABSTRACT
Coordinated reset deep brain stimulation (CR DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been demonstrated effective for the treatment of the motor signs associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). A critical CR parameter is an order in which stimulation is delivered across contacts. The relative effect of alternating vs. not alternating this order, i.e., shuffling vs. non-shuffling, however, has not been evaluated in vivo. The objective of this study is to compare the effect of shuffled vs. non-shuffled STN CR DBS on Parkinsonian motor signs. Two Parkinsonian non-human primates were implanted with a DBS lead in the STN. The effects of STN CR DBS with and without shuffling were compared with the traditional isochronal DBS (tDBS) using a within-subject design. For each stimulation setting, DBS was delivered for 2 or 4 h/day for 5 consecutive days. The severity of PD was assessed using a modified clinical rating scale immediately before, during, and 1 h after DBS, as well as on days following the discontinuation of the 5 days of daily stimulation, i.e., carryover effect. Shuffled STN CR DBS produced greater acute and carryover improvements on Parkinsonian motor signs compared with non-shuffled CR. Moreover, this difference was more pronounced when more effective stimulation intensity and burst frequency settings were used. tDBS showed limited carryover effects. Given the significant effect of shuffling on the effectiveness of CR DBS, it will be critical for future studies to further define the relative role of different CR parameters for the clinical implementation of this novel stimulation paradigm.
