Patients with Gout Treated with Conventional Urate-lowering Therapy: Association with Disease Control, Health-related Quality of Life, and Work Productivity.

OBJECTIVE: Implications of inadequate gout control were assessed through health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and work productivity of patients with gout adequately controlled while taking conventional urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for ≥ 3 months vs those whose gout was inadequately controlled. METHODS: Retrospective data were drawn from the Adelphi Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey of patients with gout in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Patients completed these questionnaires: EQ-5D (3L), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. Inadequate control was defined as the most recent serum uric acid (SUA) level > 6 mg/dl (> 360 µmol/l) or ≥ 2 flares in the last 12 months; adequate control as SUA level ≤ 6 mg/dl (≤ 360 µmol/l) and 0 flares. Appropriate statistical tests were used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: There were 836 (69%) inadequately and 368 (31%) adequately controlled gout cases. Mean age was 61 and 63 years and duration of current ULT was 32 and 57 months, respectively. Patients experiencing inadequate control reported significantly worse functioning and HRQOL, as measured by the EQ-5D (0.790 vs 0.877; difference: -0.087; p < 0.001) and PROMIS HAQ (13.21 vs 6.91; difference: 6.30; p < 0.001) scales. Productivity was also more impaired (work time missed: 4.5% vs 1.3%; impairment while working: 19.1% vs 5.2%; overall work impairment: 20.4% vs 5.6%; activity impairment: 20.3% vs 5.3%; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Less than one-third of patients had gout that was adequately controlled. Those experiencing inadequately controlled gout reported significantly worse functioning, quality of life, and work productivity. Gout treatment strategies to improve disease control may lead to improvements in HRQOL and productivity.

Management of gout in the real world: current practice versus guideline recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: Gout is a chronic, extremely painful disease that is potentially curable when treated effectively. Unfortunately approximately one-half of patients with gout are inadequately controlled. METHODS: We surveyed 315 primary care physicians in the United States and Europe to investigate current practice in the real world, as distinct from recommendations in guidelines. RESULTS: Our survey on 1657 patients found that regular testing of serum uric acid, in conformity with the guidelines, was conducted by approximately 50% of physicians. Advice to patients on diet and lifestyle was less well implemented, and identification of overweight/obese patients was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Improvements in practice by physicians would include comprehensive assessment of the patient, adoption of regular monitoring during treatment, and the provision of patient education on adherence and lifestyle.

Fixed-dose combination antidiabetic therapy: real-world factors associated with prescribing choices and relationship with patient satisfaction and compliance.

INTRODUCTION: Compliance with antidiabetic therapy has the potential to impact on the risk for complications by an effect on glycemic control. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) offer a simplified dosing regimen that may improve patient compliance. We undertook a retrospective database analysis to understand the real-world association between FDCs, treatment practices, glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, and patient perspectives in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Diabetes Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a multicenter, patient recordbased market research study of primary care physicians and diabetologists/endocrinologists in Europe. The study is based on physician interviews, completion of detailed patient record forms by physicians, and a self-completion questionnaire by patients. Regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with (1) physician-reported dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4)/metformin FDC prescribing in dual or triple therapy regimens; (2) HbA1c of patients prescribed a DPP-4 FDC alone versus free-form DPP-4 plus metformin dual therapy regimens; and (3) differences between patients prescribed any oral antidiabetic therapy (OAD) FDC therapy (alone or in combination with one other OAD) versus those prescribed dual or triple OAD free-form combination therapy. RESULTS: Physician-reported data were available for 5891 patients (mean age 61.5 years, 43% female, mean duration since diagnosis 5.7 years). Factors associated with DPP-4 FDC usage included physicians' reason for choice being "improves patient compliance." The relative mean % HbA(1c) level associated with being on a DPP-4 FDC rather than free-form independent of the physician perception of patient compliance was 0.25 lower (CI -0.40 to -0.09). When physician-perceived patient compliance was described as "fairly compliant" rather than "poorly compliant" or "not at all compliant," the relative mean % HbA1c level was 0.42 lower (CI -0.67 to -0.18). Similarly, being perceived as "fully compliant" rather than "fairly compliant" was associated with a relative mean % HbA(1c) level that was 0.17 lower (CI -0.31 to -0.02). A significant predictor for the current regimen being any FDC (alone or in combination with one other OAD) regimen was patients' satisfaction with treatment (odds ratio 1.32; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.58; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that DPP-4 FDC prescribing is considered to be a positive prescribing choice to improve compliance and that choice is associated with improved glycemic control. From the patient's perspective, the decision to prescribe an FDC is associated with improved satisfaction with treatment.