Oligometastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma. Clinical-Pathologic Study of a Histologically Under-Recognized Prostate Cancer.

The clinical parameters and the histological and immunohistochemical findings of a prospective protocolized series of 27 prostate carcinoma patients with oligometastatic disease followed homogeneously were analyzed. Lymph nodes (81.5%) and bones (18.5%) were the only metastatic sites. Local control after metastatic directed treatment was achieved in 22 (81.5%) patients. A total of 8 (29.6%) patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer. Seventeen (63%) patients presented with non-organ confined disease. The Gleason index 8-10 was the most frequently observed (12 cases, 44.4%) combined grade. Positive immunostainings were detected with androgen receptor (100%), PGP 9.5 (74%), ERG (40.7%), chromogranin A (29.6%), and synaptophysin (18.5%) antibodies. The Ki-67 index value > 5% was observed in 15% of the cases. L1CAM immunostaining was negative in all cases. Fisher exact test showed that successful local control of metastases was associated to mild inflammation, organ confined disease, Ki-67 index < 5%, and Gleason index 3 + 3. A castration resistant status was associated with severe inflammation, atrophy, a Gleason index higher than 3 + 3, Ki-67 index ≥ 5%, and positive PGP 9.5, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin immunostainings. In conclusion, oligometastatic prostate adenocarcinoma does not have a specific clinical-pathologic profile. However, some histologic and immunohistochemical parameters of routine use may help with making therapeutic decisions.

Outcomes after a first and/or second salvage treatment in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence detected by (18-F) choline PET-CT.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence after single or repeated salvage radiation treatment. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive prostate cancer patients diagnosed with oligometastatic recurrence on Ch-PET have been prospectively treated. Seven (23%) patients had castrate-resistant disease. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were examined using univariate proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The treatments administered to the initial oligorecurrence sites were intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) ± ADT (26 patients; 53%) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) ± ADT (23 patients; 47%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 6-39), 24 patients developed a biochemical failure. Twenty out of the 24 relapsed patients underwent a second Ch-PET/CT. Seven patients presented poly-metastatic relapse and 10 oligometastatic diseases. Six of 10 patients with a second oligorecurrence were treated again with SABR. Overall, 102 lesions were treated. Local control was detected in 45 (91.8%) patients. No relevant (grade ≥ 2) toxicity was reported, and there was no grade 3 toxicity. On univariate analysis, none of the variables were significantly predicted for clinical disease-free survival. At last follow-up visit, 24 patients (40%) were free from biochemical failure and 37 (71%) patients were free from clinical disease. The 2-year OS and PCSS were 91.8% and 95.9% respectively. CONCLUSION: Salvage IMRT or SBRT of oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence is associated with a prolonged cDFS. This may result in a longer time to develop castrate-resistant disease and a longer time without systemic therapies.

Should PET/CT be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A prospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the incremental staging information provided by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and its impact on management plans in patients with untreated stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: We prospectively studied, between September 2011 and February 2013, 84 consecutive patients [median age 63.5 years (39-84); 73 men] with histologically confirmed HNSCC. First, based on a conventional work-up (physical examination, CT imaging of the head, neck and chest), the multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumour Board documented the TNM stage and a management plan for each patient, outlining the modalities to be used, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy or a combination. After release of the PET/CT results, new TNM staging and management plans were agreed on by the multidisciplinary Tumour Board. Any changes in stage or intended management due to the PET/CT findings were then analysed. The impact on patient management was classified as: low (treatment modality, delivery and intent unchanged), moderate (change within the same treatment modality: type of surgery, radiation technique/dose) or high (change in treatment intent and/or treatment modality → curative to palliative, or surgery to chemoradiation or detection of unknown primary tumour or a synchronous second primary tumour). TNM stage was validated by histopathological analysis, additional imaging or follow-up. Accuracy of the conventional and PET/CT-based staging was compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Conventional and PET/CT stages were discordant in 32/84 (38 %) cases: the T stage in 2/32 (6.2 %), the N stage in 21/32 (65.7 %) and the M stage 9/32 (28.1 %). Patient management was altered in 22/84 (26 %) patients, with a moderate impact in 8 (9.5 %) patients and high impact in 14 (16.6 %) patients. PET/CT TNM classification was significantly more accurate (92.5 vs 73.7 %) than conventional staging with a p value < 0.001 (McNemar's test). CONCLUSION: PET/CT should be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of stage III-IV HNSCC.