Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 68(7): 587-94, 2015 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26331399

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Some patients with the indication of radical prostatectomy (RP) have often undergone previous surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). These previous treatments make oncological surgery more challenging because of the difficulty in the identification of bladder neck and ureteral orifices. We present a new technique that entails previous endoscopic marking of bladder neck in order to make radical prostatectomy easier. METHODS: Twelve men with previous prostatic surgery for BOO underwent a laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy between August 2008 and October 2012. The same technique was performed in all cases, a first circular endoscopic incision (EI) to mark the bladder neck and a second laparoscopic/robotic approach to complete the RP. We analyzed oncological and functional outcomes, as well as complications. RESULTS: Median operative time (EI + RP) was 175 minutes (140-205), being surgical time for endoscopic approach 20 minutes (17-31). No ureteral lesions were described and no ureteral stents were required. Positive margin rate was 8.3%. Only 1 of 5 complications observed needed surgery to be solved. Continence rate was 66.7% at one year of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a previous endoscopic bladder neck incision in patients with previous surgery for BOO makes easier the identification and dissection of the bladder neck itself during radical prostatectomy decreasing the risk of ureteral lesions as well as improving functional outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cystoscopy , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 68(7): 587-594, sept. 2015. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-144574

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Algunos de los pacientes a los que indicamos prostatectomía radical (PR) han sido sometidos a cirugía prostática previa por obstrucción cérvico-uretral (OCU). Este hecho dificulta la cirugía oncológica por la dificultad en la disección del cuello vesical y el riesgo de lesionar los meatos ureterales. Presentamos una técnica que consiste en realizar una incisión endoscópica previa en el cuello vesical con el fin de facilitar la prostatectomía radical. MÉTODOS: Doce pacientes con cirugía previa por OCU fueron sometidos a PR entre Agosto del 2008 y Octubre del 2012. La técnica empleada en todos los casos fue la misma, un primer tiempo endoscópico realizándose incisión endoscópica (IE) circunferencial para marcar el cuello vesical y un segundo tiempo laparoscópico/ robótico para completar la PR. Se analizaron resultados oncológicos y funcionales así como las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: La mediana del tiempo quirúrgico (IE+PR) fue de 175 (140-205) minutos, siendo la mediana de tiempo de la cirugía endoscópica 22 (17-31) minutos. No se describió en ningún caso lesiones a nivel de los meatos ureterales ni fue necesario cateterismo ureteral. La tasa de márgenes positivos fue del 8,3%. De las 5 complicaciones descritas, sólo una requirió de tratamiento quirúrgico. La continencia fue del 66,7% al año de la intervención. CONCLUSIONES: La realización de una incisión endoscópica en el cuello vesical, en pacientes con cirugía previa por OCU ha demostrado ser una buena estrategia como primer paso en la PR para conseguir buenos resultados oncológicos y funcionales junto con una baja tasa de complicaciones


OBJECTIVE: Some patients with the indication of radical prostatectomy (RP) have often undergone previous surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). These previous treatments make oncological surgery more challenging because of the difficulty in the identification of bladder neck and ureteral orifices. We present a new technique that entails previous endoscopic marking of bladder neck in order to make radical prostatectomy easier. METHODS: Twelve men with previous prostatic surgery for BOO underwent a laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy between August 2008 and October 2012. The same technique was performed in all cases, a first circular endoscopic incision (EI) to mark the bladder neck and a second laparoscopic/robotic approach to complete the RP. We analyzed oncological and functional outcomes, as well as complications. RESULTS: Median operative time (EI + RP) was 175 minutes (140-205), being surgical time for endoscopic approach 20 minutes (17-31). No ureteral lesions were described and no ureteral stents were required. Positive margin rate was 8.3%. Only 1 of 5 complications observed needed surgery to be solved. Continence rate was 66.7% at one year of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a previous endoscopic bladder neck incision in patients with previous surgery for BOO makes easier the identification and dissection of the bladder neck itself during radical prostatectomy decreasing the risk of ureteral lesions as well as improving functional outcomes


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/urine , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy/standards , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/nursing , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Ureteral Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ureteral Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/methods , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/complications , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/metabolism , Endoscopy , Prostatectomy/rehabilitation , Prostatectomy/standards , Prostatic Hyperplasia/metabolism , Ureteral Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Ureteral Neoplasms/therapy , Hemostasis, Endoscopic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...