Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 99(11): 636-42, 2007 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18271661

ABSTRACT

We present our initial experience in the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) with sacral root neuromodulation (SRN) by reporting the results of a prospective study with 26 patients where baseline Wexner-Cleveland scale scores and ability to delay defecation were compared to results after one year with SRN. The initial study of patients included history taking, general examination, anal ultrasonography, and manometry, and a three-week diary of continence and quality of life specific for FI was used. Before SRN the mean baseline Wexner-Cleveland score was 15.00 +/- 1.81, and 62.50% of patients could only delay defecation for less than a minute. After a year with NRS the mean Wexner-Cleveland score was 4.87 +/- 2.54 (p = 0.0031), and 75.01% of patients could delay defecation above fifteen minutes (p = 0.0018). We also describe the surgical technique and its indications, and finally review the various therapeutical options for FI and show our algorithm for this condition. SRN is an effective technique for the treatment of FI in properly selected patients with no response to medical therapies (including biofeedback) or anatomic correction (sphincteroplasty), with efficacy, little morbidity, and a short hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Fecal Incontinence/therapy , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lumbosacral Plexus , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 98(8): 573-81, 2006 Aug.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17048993

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: performing anal endosonography in complex fistula-in-ano allows us to design a personalized surgical strategy in each case, thereby improving results. However, there are doubts in the literature as to its utility in recurrent complex fistulas. The aim of this study was to compare the utility of anal ultrasonography in the study of primary versus recurrent complex fistula-in-ano. PATIENTS AND METHOD: prospective study of patients diagnosed and treated for complex fistula-in-ano. Physical examination and anal ultrasonography provided data on primary track, internal opening, horseshoe extension and the presence of secondary tracks or cavities in a protocol designed specifically for the study. These assessments were subsequently contrasted with operative findings. RESULTS: we included 35 patients, 19 (54.3%) with primary complex anal fistulas and 16 (45.7%) with recurrent fistulas. According to the operative findings, fistulas were classified as high transsphincteric in 28 patients (80%), suprasphincteric in 6 (17.1%) and extrasphincteric in one patient (2.9%), with no differences between groups. Physical examination correctly classified 28 of the 35 fistulous tracks, in contrast to the 32 (91.4%) correctly described on ultrasonography (80%). We did not find any statistically significant differences between the primary and the recurrent fistula groups with regard to sensibility, positive predictive value and accuracy of the anal ultrasonography for any of the parameters studied. CONCLUSION: the accuracy of anal ultrasonography does not decrease in recurrent complex fistula-in-ano.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Endosonography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...