ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Radiosurgery is employed for the treatment of brain metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single-dose radiosurgery (SRS) compared to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2018, we analyzed treatments of 97 patients with 135 brain metastases. Fifty-six patients were treated with SRS, and 41 patients were treated with hFSRT. Median dose was 16 Gy (12-20 Gy) for the SRS group and 30 Gy in 5-6 fractions for the hFSRT group. hFSRT was used for larger lesions and lesions located near critical structures. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for overall survival (OS) and local control (LC). RESULTS: Median age was 64 years (range, 32-89 years). Median survival was 10 months (1-68 months). With a median follow-up of 10 months, no significant differences in OS between groups were found (P=0.21). LC for all patients was 67%. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) at 6 months and 1 year was 71% and 60% for the SRS group, respectively, and 80% and 69% for the hFSRT group, respectively (P=0.93). Although hFSRT was used for larger lesions and lesions in adverse locations, LPFS was not inferior compared to lesions treated with SRS. We observed acute toxicity grade 1-2 in 25 patients (25.8%). Late complications were observed in 11 patients (11.3%). Acute and late toxicity was similar in the SRS- and hFSRT-treated patients (P=0.63 and P=0.11, respectively). Brain recurrence occurred in 37.5% and 14.6% in the hFSRT and SRS group, respectively (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Since patients treated with hFSRT exhibited similar survival and LPFS rates without differences in toxicity compared to those treated with SRS, hFSRT can be beneficial, particularly for patients with brain metastases. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Hypofractionated schemes in stereotactic radiosurgery offers treatment alternatives to patients with large lesions or lesions near critical structures.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility and analyze dosimetric differences in prone and supine position breast cancer radiotherapy in women with large or pendulous breast. METHODS: Ten post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent supine and prone computed tomography-based treatment plan. On each data set, the whole breast, the ipsilateral lung and the heart were outlined. Multisegment tangential-fields plans were generated for each position. Target coverage, homogeneity, overdosage outside breast and organ at risk sparing were analyzed and compared for supine and prone position. RESULTS: Coverage and dose homogeneity of the PTV measured by D 90 and V(95)% were similar for both plans although breast maximum dose was higher in the supine plan (p = 0.017). Prone position reduced the percentage of ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy (V(20Gy)) from 26.5 to 2.9 % (p = 0.007), medium lung dose, as well as the percentage of the heart receiving 35 Gy heart (V(35Gy)) from 3.4 to 1.2 % (p = 0.038). Overdosage of areas outside breast PTV was also consistently reduced with prone position (p = 0.012). In addition, average number of segments and monitor units needed was reduced in prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Prone position in large breast women appears to favor normal tissue sparing in breast radiotherapy as compared to supine position, without diminishing the target coverage (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/secondary , Lung/radiation effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The need for reirradiation in the metastatic disease appears when other modalities of treatment lose their efficacy. The aim of reirradiation in the metastatic disease is mainly palliative to control a particular symptom. However, this theoretical benefit must be confronted against the risk of an undesirable toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experience with reirradiation for symptomatic bone, brain or visceral metastases are reviewed. Twenty-two patients were found to have a second palliative radiotherapy on the same location. Locatión of metastases were visceral in 5 (23 %) patients, brain in 4 (18 %) patients, spine in 1 (4.5 %) patient and bone metastasis other than spine in 12 (54.5 %) patients. Median dose delivered in the first treatment was 30 Gy (range 20-30 Gy) and 20 Gy for the second treatment (range 6-32.4 Gy). RESULTS: A good symptomatic response after first irradiation (complete response or disappearance of >50 % of symptoms) was reached in 21 (95.5 %) of the 22 patients analyzed. After second irradiation, 82 % (18 patients) achieved a good response, 3 (14 %) patients had a moderate response (relief of symptoms <50 %) whereas no response was observed in 1 (4 %) patient. Acute toxicity was limited to grade 1-2 proctitis in 2 and 3 patients after the first and second irradiation, respectively. No cases of late toxicity after the first or second irradiation were recorded. CONCLUSION: A second treatment with palliative radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated and offers the possibility of symptomatic relief in a high percentage of patients with symptomatic metastases (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Neoplasm Metastasis , Viscera/pathology , Viscera/radiation effects , Remission Induction , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Palliative Care , RetreatmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The need for reirradiation in the metastatic disease appears when other modalities of treatment lose their efficacy. The aim of reirradiation in the metastatic disease is mainly palliative to control a particular symptom. However, this theoretical benefit must be confronted against the risk of an undesirable toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experience with reirradiation for symptomatic bone, brain or visceral metastases are reviewed. Twenty-two patients were found to have a second palliative radiotherapy on the same location. Locatión of metastases were visceral in 5 (23 %) patients, brain in 4 (18 %) patients, spine in 1 (4.5 %) patient and bone metastasis other than spine in 12 (54.5 %) patients. Median dose delivered in the first treatment was 30 Gy (range 20-30 Gy) and 20 Gy for the second treatment (range 6-32.4 Gy). RESULTS: A good symptomatic response after first irradiation (complete response or disappearance of >50 % of symptoms) was reached in 21 (95.5 %) of the 22 patients analyzed. After second irradiation, 82 % (18 patients) achieved a good response, 3 (14 %) patients had a moderate response (relief of symptoms <50 %) whereas no response was observed in 1 (4 %) patient. Acute toxicity was limited to grade 1-2 proctitis in 2 and 3 patients after the first and second irradiation, respectively. No cases of late toxicity after the first or second irradiation were recorded. CONCLUSION: A second treatment with palliative radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated and offers the possibility of symptomatic relief in a high percentage of patients with symptomatic metastases.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone and Bones/pathology , Bone and Bones/radiation effects , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Palliative Care , Radiotherapy Dosage , Remission Induction , Retreatment , Viscera/pathology , Viscera/radiation effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility and analyze dosimetric differences in prone and supine position breast cancer radiotherapy in women with large or pendulous breast. METHODS: Ten post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent supine and prone computed tomography-based treatment plan. On each data set, the whole breast, the ipsilateral lung and the heart were outlined. Multisegment tangential-fields plans were generated for each position. Target coverage, homogeneity, overdosage outside breast and organ at risk sparing were analyzed and compared for supine and prone position. RESULTS: Coverage and dose homogeneity of the PTV measured by D 90 and V(95)% were similar for both plans although breast maximum dose was higher in the supine plan (p = 0.017). Prone position reduced the percentage of ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy (V(20Gy)) from 26.5 to 2.9 % (p = 0.007), medium lung dose, as well as the percentage of the heart receiving 35 Gy heart (V(35Gy)) from 3.4 to 1.2 % (p = 0.038). Overdosage of areas outside breast PTV was also consistently reduced with prone position (p = 0.012). In addition, average number of segments and monitor units needed was reduced in prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Prone position in large breast women appears to favor normal tissue sparing in breast radiotherapy as compared to supine position, without diminishing the target coverage.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Organs at Risk , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Prone Position , Radiotherapy Dosage , Supine Position , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A better knowledge of the dynamic biological changes that the skin undergoes in response to ionizing radiation is advisable to improve the management of radiation dermatitis, allowing selection of patients needing treatment or close monitoring. OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of the skin in response to ionizing radiation through the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features of acute radiation dermatitis. METHODS: In this prospective descriptive study, six women (median age, 55 years; range, 45-80 years) diagnosed with breast cancer in stages IA-IB undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy were included in the study through consecutive sampling. Clinical, dermoscopic and RCM evaluation of the skin were performed prior to treatment and on days 1, 15, 30 and 45 after radiotherapy. RESULTS: While clinical features of radiation dermatitis emerged after 30 days on average, histopathological changes were detectable by RCM after a mean time of 15 days. The main RCM features included initial appearance of spongiosis, exocytosis and inflammatory cells followed by the presence of dendritic-shaped cells, 'streaming-like figures', 'broken geographic papillae', epidermal architectural disarray, effacement of rete ridges, melanophages and, finally, hyperpigmentation of the basal layer. CONCLUSIONS: RCM may safely detect the dynamic biological changes that the skin undergoes in response to ionizing radiation, even before than clinical onset of acute radiation dermatitis. Therefore, RCM may be useful to make an early and non-invasive diagnosis of radiation dermatitis during radiotherapy, allowing an early selection of patients needing treatment or close monitoring and avoiding skin biopsies.
Subject(s)
Radiodermatitis/pathology , Skin/pathology , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Microscopy, Confocal , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The concept of radiation therapy for the treatment of benign diseases refers to the use of moderate to high-energy ionising radiation as part of the treatment of non-malignant, but not necessarily harmless, diseases. The usefulness of radiation therapy, based on the anti-inflammatory properties of ionising radiation, has long been known. Apart from the treatment of intracranial benign tumours, such as meningiomas and neurinomas, the prevention of cardiovascular restenosis or treatment of skeletal degenerative diseases are, without doubt, the main fields of action for radiation therapy in benign conditions. Nonetheless, many other non-cancer entities may benefit from ionising radiation therapy treatment. The purpose of this review is to highlight and update indications for treatment with radiation therapy in benign conditions, focusing on skeletal degenerative processes, vascular conditions and soft tissue diseases.
Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/radiotherapy , Vascular Diseases/radiotherapy , Humans , Radiotherapy/methodsABSTRACT
The concept of radiation therapy for the treatment of benign diseases refers to the use of moderate to high-energy ionising radiation as part of the treatment of non-malignant, but not necessarily harmless, diseases. The usefulness of radiation therapy, based on the anti-inflammatory properties of ionising radiation, has long been known. Apart from the treatment of intracranial benign tumours, such as meningiomas and neurinomas, the prevention of cardiovascular restenosis or treatment of skeletal degenerative diseases are, without doubt, the main fields of action for radiation therapy in benign conditions. Nonetheless, many other non-cancer entities may benefit from ionising radiation therapy treatment. The purpose of this review is to highlight and update indications for treatment with radiation therapy in benign conditions, focusing on skeletal degenerative processes, vascular conditions and soft tissue diseases (AU)
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/radiotherapy , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/methods , RadiotherapyABSTRACT
No disponible
