[What risk factors are associated with mortality and readmissions in osteoporotic hip fracture?] / ¿Qué factores de riesgo se asocian con la mortalidad y los reingresos en la fractura de cadera osteoporótica?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Hip fracture in the elderly leads to long hospital stays, readmissions and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with mortality and readmissions in elderly with hip fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study in people over 65years with hip fracture between October-2017 and November-2018, followed for 12months (128 patients). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS vs27.0. RESULTS: 6 (4.7%) patients were readmitted at 1 month; at year 24 (19.4%); 55 (44.4%) consulted for emergencies; 4 (3.1%) died during admission, and 26 (20.3%) in 12months; hospital stay 6.5 (SD: 4.80) days. Those with a previous Barthel less than 85 (6 [8.5%] vs 0 [0%]; P=.037) and less EuroQol5D (6 [10.0] vs 0 [0%]; P=.011) were readmitted more at one month. Those taking anticoagulants (OR: 3.33 (1.13-9.81); P=.003) and those with high surgical risk (18 [23.4%] vs 1 [5.6%]) were readmitted more after one year; P=.038). There was higher intra-episode mortality with renal failure (OR: 34.2 [3.25-359.93]; P=.003) and decompensated heart failure (OR: 23.8 [2.76-205.25]; P=.015). Higher mortality at one year in those older than 85years (OR: 4.3 [1.48-12.49]; P=.007); in those taking benzodiazepines (OR: 2.86 [1.06-7.73]; P=.038); if Barthel was less than 85 (OR: 2.96 [1.1-7.99]; P=.027) and if EuroQol5D was low (0.249 vs 0.547; P=.025). Those operated after 72h (24 [57.1%] vs. 29 [38.2%]; P=.047) consulted more for the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure and cardiac decompensation increased intra-episode mortality. Older age, benzodiazepines, and previous low functionality and low EuroQol5D increased mortality at one year. They were readmitted more if higher surgical risk, previously anticoagulated and worse quality of life and functionality.

Modelos de atención al paciente pluripatológico / Care models for polypathological patients

Los pacientes pluripatológicos tienen unas características clínicas, funcionales, psicoafectivas, sociofamiliares y espirituales específicas. Son generalmente de edad avanzada, frágiles, con frecuentes descompensaciones, uso frecuente de recursos sanitarios, deterioro funcional importante y un elevado índice de dependencia; de lo que se deriva un importante impacto social, mortalidad elevada y consumo de recursos. Los modelos asistenciales actuales no han dado respuesta a estas necesidades, lo que produce problemas en la accesibilidad a los servicios sanitarios, descoordinación entre estos, mayor probabilidad de eventos adversos relacionados con la polimedicación y un alto consumo de recursos. En la última década, los modelos asistenciales están cambiando y se caracterizan por el trabajo en equipo multidisciplinar e interniveles, el autocuidado del paciente, la disponibilidad de herramientas para la toma de decisiones, los sistemas de información y comunicación y la prevención. Se pretende conseguir un equipo de salud preparado y proactivo y una población de pacientes informados y activados. La evaluación de los resultados en salud, procesos y costes de estos programas, se apoya todavía en evidencias moderadas o bajas. Por ello, no es fácil determinar el tipo e intensidad de las intervenciones, ni los grupos de pacientes sobre los que pueden aportar más beneficios (AU)

Polypathological patients have specific clinical, functional, psychoaffective, social, family and spiritual characteristics. These patients are generally elderly and frail and have frequent decompensations. They frequently use healthcare resources, have significant functional impairment and have a high index of dependence. This results in a significant social impact, high mortality and a high consumption of resources. The current healthcare models have not answered these needs, which causes problems with accessibility to healthcare services, a lack of coordination among these services, a higher probability of adverse events related to polypharmacy and a high consumption of resources. In the past decade, the healthcare models have changed and are characterized by work in multidisciplinary and interlevel teams, patient self-care, the availability of tools for decision making, information and communication systems and prevention. The goal is to have prepared and proactive health teams and an informed and active patient population. The assessment of health results, processes and the costs for these programs is still based on moderate to low evidence. It is therefore not an easy task to determine the type and intensity of interventions or to determine the patient groups that could gain more benefits (AU)

Care models for polypathological patients. / Modelos de atención al paciente pluripatológico.

Polypathological patients have specific clinical, functional, psychoaffective, social, family and spiritual characteristics. These patients are generally elderly and frail and have frequent decompensations. They frequently use healthcare resources, have significant functional impairment and have a high index of dependence. This results in a significant social impact, high mortality and a high consumption of resources. The current healthcare models have not answered these needs, which causes problems with accessibility to healthcare services, a lack of coordination among these services, a higher probability of adverse events related to polypharmacy and a high consumption of resources. In the past decade, the healthcare models have changed and are characterized by work in multidisciplinary and interlevel teams, patient self-care, the availability of tools for decision making, information and communication systems and prevention. The goal is to have prepared and proactive health teams and an informed and active patient population. The assessment of health results, processes and the costs for these programs is still based on moderate to low evidence. It is therefore not an easy task to determine the type and intensity of interventions or to determine the patient groups that could gain more benefits.

Validation of PROFUND prognostic index over a four-year follow-up period.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The PROFUND index stratifies accurately the 12-month mortality risk of polypathological patients (PPs), but its fitness over a longer follow-up period remains unknown. We aimed to explore the calibration and discrimination power of PROFUND index over 4-years, in order to assess its follow-up interval generalizability. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort-study. SETTING: 33 Spanish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: PPs included after hospital discharge, outpatient clinics, or home hospitalization. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality over a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: PROFUND index calibration was assessed by risk-quartiles predicted/observed mortality (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test), and its discrimination power by ROC curves. RESULTS: A total of 768 patients were included (630 [82%] of them completed the 4-year follow-up). Global mortality rate was 63.5%. When assessing individual patient scores, mortality was 52% in the lowest risk group (0-2 points in PROFUND score); 73.5% in the low-intermediate risk group (3-6 points), 85% in the intermediate-high group (7-10 points); and 92% in the highest risk group (≥11 points). Accuracy testing of the PROFUND index showed good calibration (P=.8 in the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test), and also a good discrimination power (AUC=0.71 [0.67-0.77] in ROC curve). CONCLUSIONS: The PROFUND index maintained its accuracy in predicting mortality of polypathological patients over a 4-year follow-up period. This index may be of potential usefulness in deciding the most appropriate health-care interventions in populations with multimorbidity.

Inappropriate prescribing in elderly people with diabetes admitted to hospital.

AIMS: To assess inappropriate prescribing in older people with diabetes mellitus during the month prior to a hospitalization, using tools on potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) and comparing inappropriate prescribing in patients with without diabetes. METHODS: In an observational, prospective multicentric study, we assessed inappropriate prescribing in 672 patients aged 75 years and older during hospital admission. The Beers, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria and Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE-3) medicine quality indicators were used. We analysed demographic and clinical factors associated with inappropriate prescribing. RESULTS: Of 672 patients, 249 (mean age 82.4 years, 62.9% female) had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The mean number of prescribing drugs per patient with diabetes was 12.6 (4.5) vs. 9.4 (4.3) in patients without diabetes (P < 0.001). Of those patients with diabetes, 74.2% used 10 or more medications; 54.5% of patients with diabetes had at least one Beers-listed PIM, 68.1% had at least one STOPP-listed PIM, 64.6% had at least one START-listed PPO and 62.8% had at least one ACOVE-3-listed PPO. Except for the Beers criteria, these prevalences were significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in those without. After excluding diabetes-related items from these tools, only STOPP-listed PIMs remained significantly higher among patients with diabetes (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is common among older patients with diabetes mellitus. Inappropriate prescribing is higher in older patients with diabetes, even when diabetes-related treatment is excluded from the inappropriate prescribing evaluation.

[Impact of a software application to improve medication reconciliation at hospital discharge]. / Impacto de una aplicación informática en la mejora de la conciliación de la medicación al alta hospitalaria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a software application to improve the quality of information concerning current patient medications and changes on the discharge report after hospitalization. To analyze the incidence of errors and to classify them. MATERIAL AND METHOD DESIGN: Quasi-experimental pre / post study with non-equivalent control group study. STUDY POPULATION: Medical patients at hospital discharge. INTERVENTION: implementation of a software application. VARIABLES: Percentage of reconciled patient medication on discharge, and percentage of patients with more than one unjustified discrepancy. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were assessed; 199 (pre-intervention phase) and 150 (post-intervention phase). Before the implementation of the application in 157 patients (78.8%) medication reconciliation had been completed; finding reconciliation errors in 99 (63.0%). The most frequent type of error, 339 (78.5%), was a missing dose or administration frequency information. After implementation, all the patient prescriptions were reconciled when the software was used. The percentage of patients with unjustified discrepancies decreased from 63.0% to 11.8% with the use of the application (p<.001). The main type of discrepancy found on using the application was confusing prescription, due to the fact that the professionals were not used to using the new tool. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a software application has been shown to improve the quality of the information on patient treatment on the hospital discharge report, but it is still necessary to continue development as a strategy for improving medication reconciliation.

Impacto de una aplicación informática en la mejora de la conciliación de la medicación al alta hospitalaria / Impact of a software application to improve medication reconciliation at hospital discharge

Fundamento y objetivo. Evaluar el impacto de una aplicación informática en la mejora de la calidad de la información sobre el tratamiento domiciliario y los cambios tras la hospitalización en el informe de alta hospitalaria. Analizar la incidencia de errores y clasificarlos. Material y método. Diseño: estudio cuasi-experimental antes/después con grupo control no equivalente. Población de estudio: pacientes ingresados en plantas de especialidades médicas. Intervención: puesta en marcha de una aplicación informática integrada en la historia clínica digital. Variables: porcentaje de pacientes conciliados del total de pacientes con alta y porcentaje de pacientes con más de una discrepancia no justificada. Resultados. Se han evaluado 349 pacientes; 199 (preintervención) y 150 (postintervención). En la fase preintervención en 157 pacientes (78,8%) se había realizado el proceso de conciliación, hallándose discrepancias no justificadas en 99 (63,0%). El tipo de error más frecuente, n= 339 (78,5%), fue por prescripción incompleta. Tras la implantación, cuando se utilizó la aplicación, la conciliación se realizó en todos los pacientes. El porcentaje de pacientes con discrepancias no justificadas se redujo del 63,0% al 11,8% con el uso de la aplicación (p < 0,001). El tipo de discrepancias encontradas al usar la aplicación fue prescripción confusa, motivada por falta de familiarización de los profesionales con la nueva herramienta. Conclusiones. La utilización de una aplicación informática como apoyo al proceso de conciliación ha demostrado mejorar la calidad de la información en el informe de alta hospitalaria sobre el tratamiento del paciente, siendo necesario continuar su desarrollo como estrategia para mejorar el proceso de conciliación (AU)

Background and objective. To assess the impact of a software application to improve the quality of information concerning current patient medications and changes on the discharge report after hospitalization. To analyze the incidence of errors and to classify them. Material and method Design. Quasi-experimental pre / post study with non-equivalent control group study. Study population: Medical patients at hospital discharge. Intervention: implementation of a software application. Variables: Percentage of reconciled patient medication on discharge, and percentage of patients with more than one unjustified discrepancy. Results. A total of 349 patients were assessed; 199 (pre-intervention phase) and 150 (post-intervention phase). Before the implementation of the application in 157 patients (78.8%) medication reconciliation had been completed; finding reconciliation errors in 99 (63.0%). The most frequent type of error, 339 (78.5%), was a missing dose or administration frequency information. After implementation, all the patient prescriptions were reconciled when the software was used. The percentage of patients with unjustified discrepancies decreased from 63.0% to 11.8% with the use of the application (p < .001). The main type of discrepancy found on using the application was confusing prescription, due to the fact that the professionals were not used to using the new tool. Conclusions. The use of a software application has been shown to improve the quality of the information on patient treatment on the hospital discharge report, but it is still necessary to continue development as a strategy for improving medication reconciliation (AU)

Programa de atención integral a pacientes mayores de 65 años con fractura de cadera / Comprehensive care program for elderly patients over 65 years with hip fracture

Objetivos. Presentamos los resultados en salud de un programa de asistencia multidisciplinar a pacientes con fractura de cadera mayores de 65 años. Pacientes y métodos. Hemos desarrollado un modelo de coordinación asistencial para la atención integral del paciente con fractura de cadera, estableciendo qué, quién, cuándo, cómo y dónde intervienen traumatólogos, internistas, médicos de familia de urgencias, intensivistas, fisioterapeutas, anestesistas, enfermeros y trabajadores sociales. Se evaluaron retrospectivamente todos los pacientes mayores de 65 años que ingresaron con diagnóstico de fractura de cadera (años 2006 a 2010). Resultados. Se incluyen 1.000 episodios de fractura de cadera ocurridos en 956 pacientes. La edad media fue de 82 años y la estancia media de 6,7 días, reduciéndose 1,14 días en los 5 años del programa. Antes de las 72h se intervinieron el 85,1%, y el 91,2% a lo largo del programa. La incidencia de infección quirúrgica fue del 1,5% y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria del 4,5% (24,2% a los 12 meses). Al cabo de un año reingresaron el 14,9%, y el 40% de los enfermos consiguieron ser independientes para las actividades básicas de su vida diaria. Conclusiones. Este programa de atención multidisciplinar al paciente con fractura de cadera se asoció a resultados beneficiosos en salud, con un elevado porcentaje de pacientes intervenidos precozmente (más del 90%), una reducida estancia media (menos de 7 días), incidencia de infecciones quirúrgicas, reingresos y mortalidad intrahospitalaria y al año de seguimiento, así como una adecuada recuperación funcional (AU)

Objectives. To report the health outcomes of a multidisciplinary care program for patients over 65 years with hip fracture. Patients and methods. We have developed a care coordination model for the comprehensive care of hip fracture patients. It establishes what, who, when, how and where orthopedists, internists, family physicians, emergency, intensive care, physiotherapists, anesthetists, nurses and workers social intervene. All elderly patients over 65 years admitted with the diagnosis of hip fracture (years 2006 to 2010) were retrospectively evaluated. Results. One thousand episodes of hip fracture, corresponding to 956 patients, were included. Mean age was 82 years and mean stay 6.7 days. This was reduced by 1.14 days during the 5 years of the program. A total of 85.1% were operated on before 72 yours, and 91.2% during the program. Incidence of surgical site infection was 1.5%. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%, (24.2% at 12 months). Readmissions at one years was 14.9%. Independence for basic activity of daily living was achieved by 40% of the patients. Conclusions. This multidisciplinary care program for hip fracture patients is associated with positive health outcomes, with a high percentage of patients treated early (more than 90%), reduced mean stay (less than 7 days), incidence of surgical site infections, readmissions and inpatient mortality and at one year, as well as adequate functional recovery (AU)

Comprehensive care program for elderly patients over 65 years with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To report the health outcomes of a multidisciplinary care program for patients over 65 years with hip fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have developed a care coordination model for the comprehensive care of hip fracture patients. It establishes what, who, when, how and where orthopedists, internists, family physicians, emergency, intensive care, physiotherapists, anesthetists, nurses and workers social intervene. All elderly patients over 65 years admitted with the diagnosis of hip fracture (years 2006 to 2010) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: One thousand episodes of hip fracture, corresponding to 956 patients, were included. Mean age was 82 years and mean stay 6.7 days. This was reduced by 1.14 days during the 5 years of the program. A total of 85.1% were operated on before 72 yours, and 91.2% during the program. Incidence of surgical site infection was 1.5%. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%, (24.2% at 12 months). Readmissions at one years was 14.9%. Independence for basic activity of daily living was achieved by 40% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary care program for hip fracture patients is associated with positive health outcomes, with a high percentage of patients treated early (more than 90%), reduced mean stay (less than 7 days), incidence of surgical site infections, readmissions and inpatient mortality and at one year, as well as adequate functional recovery.

Development of a new predictive model for polypathological patients. The PROFUND index.

BACKGROUND: There is a concern about the accuracy of the available prognostic indexes when applying them to the emergent population of polypathological patients (PP). METHODS: To develop a 1-year mortality predictive index on PP, we developed a multicenter prospective cohort-study recruiting 1.632 PP after hospital discharge, outpatient clinics, or home hospitalization, from 33 hospitals. Potential risk factors were obtained in the 1.525 PP who completed follow-up. Each factor independently associated with mortality in the derivation cohort (757 PP from western hospitals) was assigned a weight, and risk scores were calculated by adding the points of each factor. Accuracy was assessed in the validation cohort (768 PP from eastern hospitals) by risk quartiles calibration, and discrimination power, by ROC curves. Finally, accuracy of the index was compared with that of the Charlson index. RESULTS: Mortality in the derivation/validation cohorts was 35%/39.5%, respectively. Nine independent mortality predictors were identified to create the index (age ≥85 years, 3 points; No caregiver or caregiver other than spouse, 2 points; active neoplasia, 6 points; dementia, 3 points; III-IV functional class on NYHA and/or MRC, 3 points; delirium during last hospital admission, 3 points; hemoglobinemia <10 g/dl, 3 points; Barthel index <60 points, 4 points; ≥4 hospital admissions in last 12 months, 3 points). Mortality in the derivation/validation cohorts was 12.1%/14.6% for patients with 0-2 points; 21.5%/31.5% for those with 3-6 points; 45%/50% for those with 7-10 points; and 68%/61.3% for those with ≥11 points, respectively. Calibration was good in derivation/validation cohorts, and discrimination power by area under the curve was 0.77/0.7. Calibration of the Charlson index was good, but discrimination power was suboptimal (area under the curve, 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: This prognostic index provides an accurate and transportable method of stratifying 1-year death risk in PP.

A multi-institutional, hospital-based assessment of clinical, functional, sociofamilial and health-care characteristics of polypathological patients (PP).

Little is known about the main features of the emergent population of PP. Our objective was to determine the clinical, care and social characteristics of a multi-institutional population of PP, by means of a cross-sectional study including a reference population of hospital-based PP from 36 hospitals. The main clinical, functional, mental and social features and their associated factors were assessed: 1632 PP (53% males, mean age 77.9±9.8 years) were included. An informal caregiver was required by 52% (78% of caregivers were close female relatives). The mean inclusion criteria (Cat): were 2.7±0.8 (49.5% presented ≥3 Cat). The most frequent inclusion Cat were heart (77.5%), lung (45.6%), neurological (38.2%), and kidney diseases (32.2%), whereas the mean of other comorbidities was 4.5±2.7 per PP. The mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 4; 47.6%, and 52.4% presented dyspnea ≥3 on the NYHA, and on the MRC, respectively; nearly 19% required home oxygen therapy, 19% had suffered >1 fall in previous year, and 11% suffered an active neoplasia. The mean hospital admissions in last 12/3 months, and chronically prescribed drugs were 2/1, and 8±3, respectively. More than 70% presented obesity, while 60% had hypoalbuminemia. The basal/inclusion Barthel index (BI) score was 69±31/58±34 (BI score<60 was present in 31.5%/44%, respectively); and the mean Pfeiffer score was 2.94±3.2 (43% answered with ≥3 errors). More than half of the subjects were at risk or already had established social problems. This emergent population is considerably homogeneous, highly complex, clinically vulnerable, functionally impaired, dependent on caregivers and socially fragile. They need to receive more attention in clinical research and more support in health interventions based on comprehensive attention and continuity of care.

Síndrome febril en el paciente de edad avanzada. Estrategias diagnósticas / Febrile syndrome in an elderley patient

El síndrome febril en la persona de edad avanzadarespecto al adulto joven tiene una expresión clinica,una prevalencia de causas específicas y un abordajediagnóstico, que requieren una evaluacióndiferencial. La importancia de este síndrome seincrementa, además, con el aumento de la edad denuestra población, y debe ser considerada en estospacientes siempre como un síntoma de alarma. Encuanto a la etiologia, la arteritis de células giganteses la causa más frecuente de fiebre prolongada sinfoco evidente, seguida –según ambienteepidemiológico– de la tuberculosis y de lasneoplasias hematológicas. No hay consenso sobre elabordaje diagnóstico, pero es imprescindibleconsiderar el principio de no maleficiencia, debido almayor riesgo de complicaciones asociadas a laspruebas invasivas y a la menor tolerancia a éstas

Fever in the elderly as compared with young adultshas a clinical expression, prevalence, and diagnosisthat require a specific type of evaluation. Thesignificance of fever in the elderly gains importancewith the increase of the population’s age and it mustbe considered an alarm signal in these patients.Etiologically, the primary cause of prolonged feverwith unspecific origin in this population, is arteritisof giant cells, followed by (according toepidemiological environment) tuberculosis andhematological neoplasias. There is no consensus ondiagnostic approaches, but it is essential to takegreat care in the process due to risk associated withinvasive tests and low tolerance to them

[Febrile syndrome in an elderly patient]. / Síndrome febril en el paciente de edad avanzada. Estrategias diagnósticas.

Fever in the elderly as compared with young adults has a clinical expression, prevalence, and diagnosis that require a specific type of evaluation. The significance of fever in the elderly gains importance with the increase of the population's age and it must be considered an alarm signal in these patients. Etiologically, the primary cause of prolonged fever with unspecific origin in this population, is arteritis of giant cells, followed by (according to epidemiological environment) tuberculosis and hematological neoplasias. There is no consensus on diagnostic approaches, but it is essential to take great care in the process due to risk associated with invasive tests and low tolerance to them.

[Continuity of medical care. Evaluation of a collaborative program between hospital and Primary Care]. / Continuidad asistencial. Evaluación de un programa de colaboración entre Atención Hospitalaria y Atención Primaria.

The patients being treated in our health care system are becoming increasingly older and have a greater prevalence of chronic diseases. Due to these factors, these patients require greater and easier accessibility to the system as well as continuity of medical care. Collaboration between the different levels of health care has been instrumental in the success of the system and has produced changes in the hospital medical care protocol. Our hospital has developed a care model oriented towards the patient's needs, resulting in a higher grade of satisfaction among the medical professionals. In this paper, we have given a detailed description of part of our medical model, illustrating its different components and indicating several parameters of its evaluation. We have also reviewed the current state of the various models published on this topic. In summary, we believe that this medical care model presents a different approach to management that benefits patients, medical professionals and the health system alike.

Continuidad asistencial. Evaluación de un programa de colaboración entre Atención Hospitalaria y Atención Primaria / Continuity of medical care. Evaluation of a collaborative program between hospital and Primary Care

Los pacientes atendidos en nuestro sistema sanitario tienen cada vez más edad y mayor prevalencia de enfermedades crónicas. Estas características de salud han condicionado que entre las expectativas de mayor relevancia de los pacientes, se indiquen la accesibilidad al sistema y la continuidad en los cuidados. La colaboración entre los distintos niveles asistenciales ha sido una herramienta reconocida que facilita la consecución de estas expectativas, provocando cambios en la organización del trabajo. Nuestro hospital ha desarrollado un modelo de atención sanitaria que ­en su orientación al enfermo­ facilita la colaboración entre los distintos niveles asistenciales, consiguiendo un grado de satisfacción de los profesionales elevado. En este trabajo se describe detalladamente parte del modelo, mostrando los elementos que lo caracterizan, indicando algunos parámetros de la evaluación de resultados y revisando la situación de los modelos de continuidad asistencial publicados. En resumen, consideramos que este sistema asistencial está dotado de elementos de gestión que permiten atender las expectativas de los usuarios, aportando beneficios para el paciente, el profesional y el sistema sanitario (AU)

The patients being treated in our health care system are becoming increasingly older and have a greater prevalence of chronic diseases. Due to these factors, these patients require greater and easier accessibility to the system as well as continuity of medical care. Collaboration between the different levels of health care has been instrumental in the success of the system and has produced changes in the hospital medical care protocol. Our hospital has developed a care model oriented towards the patient's needs, resulting in a higher grade of satisfaction among the medical professionals. In this paper, we have given a detailed description of part of our medical model, illustrating its different components and indicating several parameters of its evaluation. We have also reviewed the current state of the various models published on this topic. In summary, we believe that this medical care model presents a different approach to management that benefits patients, medical professionals and the health system alike (AU)

Moratoria para el test de Kveim / Moratorium on Kveim test

No disponible