Endoperiodontal lesions: diagnosis first, then treatment and not always tooth extraction: a cross-sectional survey in Spain and a proposal of a clinical treatment protocol.

Background: Endoperiodontal lesion (EPL) is defined as a pathological communication between pulpal and periodontal tissues. Currently, accurate diagnosis and treatment of this pathology are challenging. This study aims to identify the different endoperiodontal therapies to propose a clinical protocol to simplify and unify the criteria for EPL treatment. Material and Methods: Observational cross-sectional study through an electronic survey. This study matches STROBE guidelines. The anonymous questionnaire contained open-ended and close-ended questions and was distributed to dentistry professors of the UPV/EHU and different professionals from Spanish associations and scientific societies. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: A total of 128 responses were obtained, of which 120 were active professionals or had not been so for less than 5 years. The majority of professionals were women (65.6%) and from the Basque Country (63.9%). A total of 86.6% reported having complementary studies to a degree or a bachelor's degree. The treatments performed by these professionals were similar to those reported in the literature, which started with root canal treatment when there was an endodontic origin (91.5%), and with basic periodontal treatment when periodontal (51.3%). Conclusions: Considering the current scientific evidence and the clinical practice of professionals in the treatment of EPL, we designed a clinical protocol. This protocol needs validation in larger populations and with longer follow-ups. Key words:Clinical protocol, Dental pulp diseases, Periodontal diseases, Review, Surveys and questionnaires.

Presence and implication of Candida spp. in patients with peri-implantitis enrolled in a supportive peri-implant therapy program of the Basque Country (Spain). A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The peri-implant sulcus is a good niche for infectious colonization such as Candida spp. In this study, the level of Candida spp. fungal colonization is analyzed in patients with peri-implantitis under supportive peri-implant therapy, as well as its correlation with the main clinicopathological data. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out on 161 patients treated with dental implants, 80 with PI and 81 without PI, which corresponded to 91 women and 70 men, whose mean age was 60.90 years. A specific protocol was completed for the clinical and implant data. Microbiological samples were taken by oral rinse and with paper tips from the peri-implant sulcus. For the quantitative and qualitative analysis Candida Chromogenic Agar/CONDA plates were incubated for 72 h at 36 + 1°C. Fungal growth was considered active when having more than 50 CFU. Specific Candida spp. cultures were later confirmed by API ID 32C and PCR. RESULTS: Fungal growth was achieved in 28% of oral rinse and 6.75% of peri-implant fluid samples. No significant differences were recognized between study groups. Most of the cultures (>65%) showed more than 50 CFU. The most frequent species were Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. There was no association between different PI risk factors and fungal data. The presence of Candida spp. in the oral cavity of patients with dental implants was related to total edentulism and the use of implant-fixed complete prosthesis implant-retained removable prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there is no link between PI and presence of Candida in patients with dental implants undergoing regular supportive periodontal therapy.

Periodontal health in a population with Parkinson's disease in Spain: a cross-sectional study

Background: The aim of this research is to evaluate the periodontal health of patients with Parkinson Disease (PD) in a Spanish cohort. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 104 patients with PD (mean age: 66.19+9.3 years) and 106 controls (mean age: 59.26+14.11 years). A pre-designed clinical protocol was implemented, which included a standardized epidemiological index for periodontal disease (CPITN), clinical attachment loss (CAL), tooth-loss, full mouth plaque index (FMPI), and oral hygienic habits. Univariate descriptions and comparative analysis were performed. Results: The majority of PD patients presented good oral hygienic habits. There were no significant differences in relation to CPITN, periodontitis, gingival recessions and tooth loss. However, moderate/severe CAL (p=0.027) and FMPI (p=0.003) was higher in the PD group. Conclusions: There were no differences on periodontitis and tooth loss between both groups. The higher number of advanced CAL and presence of biofilm in the PD group could be related to the difficulties to perform an effective tooth brushing due to this neurological disorder. (AU)

Comparative study of the modified VISTA technique (m-VISTA) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the percentage of mean root coverage (MRC%) obtained in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 gingival recessions using the modified VISTA (m-VISTA) technique versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique, using a connective tissue graft (CTG) in both cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were randomly treated with m-VISTA (test group (TG) = 12) or CAF (control group (CG) = 12). A calibrated, experienced, and blinded examiner collected data related to multiple periodontal clinical variables, especially the recession (REC) in order to calculate the MRC% at 6 and 12 months, which was the primary outcome of the study. Also, the radiological bone level, the characteristics of the CTG, and postsurgical incidences were assessed. Finally, a descriptive and an analytical statistical analysis of the variables and their associations was performed. RESULTS: The recessions (n = 84) were located mainly in the mandible (n = 65) and in posterior sectors (premolars: n = 35; molars: n = 8). At 6 months, the MRC% was 61% (2 mm) for both study groups, and at 12 months, it increased to 73.26% (2.11 mm) in the TG and decreased to 56.49% (1.78 mm) in the CG. CONCLUSION: When approaching multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions, there were no statistically significant differences in the MRC% at 6 and 12 months between the group treated with the m-VISTA technique and the group treated with the CAF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The characteristics of the m-VISTA technique, such as the closed approach, the mobilization of the papilla, and the coronal stabilization of the CTG, could facilitate the maturation of the tissues in the treatment of Miller class III/RT2 recessions. This would favor better root coverage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03258996.

Complete root coverage in the treatment of Miller class III or RT2 gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the evidence on complete root coverage (CRC) achieved by periodontal plastic techniques in the treatment of Miller class III/RT2 gingival recessions, comparing techniques developed along the twentieth century (pre-twenty-first) versus surgical approaches of the twenty-first century (21st). METHODS: An electronic bibliographic search was carried out in four databases up to December 2019, focusing on studies that reported CRC results in Miller class III or RT2 recessions treatment with at least a six-month follow-up. In addition, a random-effects models' meta-analysis was performed for the CRC, comparing pre-twenty-first versus twenty-first century techniques at 6 months, 12 months and more than 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-seven publications were included. A total of 933 gingival recessions were treated, 298 with pre-twenty-first century surgical techniques and 635 with techniques from the twenty-first century. CRC was achieved at 6 months on half of the recessions (pre-twenty-first: 57.60% vs. 21st: 51.11%), but decreased markedly for twenty-first century techniques at 12 months (pre-twenty-first: 63.82% vs. 21st: 32.87%). Thereafter, this difference was the other way around (> 12 months: pre-twenty-first: 5.26% vs. 21st: 19.65%). The meta-analysis showed a high heterogeneity, with no significant differences amongst the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Although CRC might be achievable by treating Miller class III or RT2 recessions with any of the described techniques, its long-term stability is not predictable. More randomized clinical trials with longer follow-ups and several visits, are needed. In addition, the patient's satisfaction should also be assessed.

Description of the modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (m-VISTA) technique in the treatment of multiple Miller class III gingival recessions: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession is a common finding in the adult population. It is considered a challenge for clinicians to obtain a complete root coverage of Miller class III recession. The aim of this case series was to assess the outcomes achieved with the use of modified VISTA technique (m-VISTA) in patients having multiple Miller class III recessions after 6 months. METHODS: Ten patients (six women and four men; mean age: 53 years), who showed multiple Miller class III recessions (depth ≥ 2 mm) and who met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, were treated by postgraduate students with the use of m-VISTA technique. RESULTS: A total of 38 recessions were performed. The recessions were mainly located in the mandible (80%), which included six molars. The mean baseline recession was 3.12 mm. Post the intervention, a mean root coverage of 58.72% was achieved, with complete root coverage observed in 29% of the recessions. CONCLUSIONS: m-VISTA may offer several advantages in the treatment of Miller class III gingival recession. Nevertheless, more clinical trials with a longer follow-up period are needed to arrive at a concrete conclusion about its advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03258996. Data registration: 08/18/2017.

Immediate temporary restoration of single-tooth implants: Prospective clinical study

Purpose: The goal of this study is to ass ess the survival, marginal bone loss and complications around sing le-toothimplants on which immediate provisionalization was carried out.Patients and Methods: 78 implants were placed in 57 patients:56 after extraction and 22 in healed sockets. Immediatelyafter surgery provisional crowns were delivered without contacts in both centric and excursive jaw movements.The final crowns were inserted between 3 to 6 months later. During the study there were 3 x-rays takenper patient. The marginal bone loss was measured and complications were recorded. The statistical analys is of thedata was carried out with the STATA 10® software.Results: The mean duration of the study was 92 weeks. Survival rate was 98.7% (1 failure out of 78 implants). Themean mesial bone loss was 0.2±0.4 mm and the mean distal bone loss was 0.2±0.4 mm. No statistically significantdiff erences were found between immediate or delayed implants. 67 implants sh owed a bone loss less than 1 mm,and 36 did not sh ow any bone loss at all.The main complications were the uncementing of the crowns (11 crowns ), the presence of cement remnants (10crowns ) and the development of apical lesions around implants (6 implants).Conclusion: With the limitations of this study, it can be concluded by saying that immediate restoration withsing le-tooth implants and provisional crowns may be cons idered as a predictable technique (AU)

No disponible

Immediate temporary restoration of single-tooth implants: Prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to assess the survival, marginal bone loss and complications around single-tooth implants on which immediate provisionalization was carried out. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 78 implants were placed in 57 patients: 56 after extraction and 22 in healed sockets. Immediately after surgery provisional crows were delivered without contacts in both centric and excursive jaw movements. The final crowns were inserted between 3 to 6 months later. During the study there were 3 x-rays taken per patient. The marginal bone loss was measured and complications were recorded. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out with the STATA 10® software. RESULTS: The mean duration of the study was 92 weeks. Survival rate was 98.7% (1 failure out of 78 implants). The mean mesial bone loss was 0.2 ± 0.4 mm and the mean distal bone loss was 0.2 ± 0.4 mm. No statistically significant differences were found between immediate or delayed implants. 67 implants showed a bone loss less than 1 mm, and 36 did not show any bone loss at all. The main complications were the uncementing of the crowns (11 crowns), the presence of cement remnants (10 crowns) and the development of apical lesions around implants (6 implants). CONCLUSION: With the limitations of this study, it can be concluded by saying that immediate restoration with single-tooth implants and provisional crowns may be considered as a predictable technique.