Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Chromatogr A ; 1520: 35-47, 2017 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918855

ABSTRACT

An in-tube solid phase microextraction, coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (IT-SPME-HPLC-DAD) method, has been developed for the simultaneous determination of 13 diesters (from dimethyl to dioctylphthalate plus diisobutyl, benzylbutyl, di-2-ethylhexyl, diisononyl and diisodecylphthalate) and 2 monoesters of phthalic acid (mono-butyl and mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate) in particulate matter (PM10). Triethylamine at pH=3 was used as an ion-pair reagent with a double function, of regulating the chromatographic retention of the monoesters and the most hydrophilic diesters on a monolithic silica column, and of improving their extraction on a porous polymer with divinylbenzene-4-vinylpyridine capillary. The chromatographic separation was achieved in 13min. A previous ultrasound-assisted extraction from PM10filters was also optimized using methanol as solvent. The method detection limits were 0.09-0.52ngm-3, the inter-day precision at concentration of 20ngmL-1 was between 4.2% and 12.7% (n=15), and the average recovery was 87.3%. The average absolute IT-SPME recovery was 26.2% and the linear range reached up to 109ngm-3 for most analytes. The method was applied to PM10 samples from different environments collected in Galicia (Spain). DiBP was the major phthalate, followed by its isomer DnBP in urban sites and by DEP in the suburban area. In all samples, DEHP quantified correlates with the isomers of dibutylphthalate. Total PAE concentration was between 14.5 and 245.5ngm-3. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a method allows the simultaneous determination of 13 phthalates and their degradation products in particulate matter.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Particulate Matter/chemistry , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Solid Phase Microextraction , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Limit of Detection , Spain
2.
Chemosphere ; 175: 52-65, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211335

ABSTRACT

Six phthalic acid esters were determined in rainwater samples, from which a very low sample volume was collected. This method combines on-line in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography with a diode-array detector. In order to obtain a short analysis time and to reduce the consumption of organic solvents, two chromatographic phases (C18 monolithic and cyanopropyl silica) are compared. Although three critical pairs are found, faster separation, good resolution and lower pressures are achieved using C18 monolithic column. In order to achieve a simple and sensitive method, two commercial capillaries (a porous polymer with divinylbenzene-4-vinylpyridine and a liquid-phase capillary with 95% poly(dimethylsiloxane)-5% poly(diphenylsiloxane)) are tested for the extraction process. Due to great differences of hydrophobicity among the six phthalates, the selection of a modifier is necessary for a good extraction. The best conditions are achieved using 5 mL of sample containing 40% methanol in a 70 cm-long porous polymer capillary. The procedural blanks are controlled and taken into account in the calculation of the detection limits. Except for dimethylphthalate, the method detection limits are in the range from 0.2 to 0.9 ng mL-1 and the inter-day precision is between 5.3% and 12.5%. The recoveries were within the range of 71%-101%. Rainwater samples are analyzed in order to examine the dilution effect and washout of phthalates in the atmosphere. Dibutyl phthalate is the predominant phthalate found and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate is detected in all analyzed samples.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Rain/chemistry , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Dibutyl Phthalate/analysis , Esters/analysis , Limit of Detection
3.
Talanta ; 155: 175-84, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216671

ABSTRACT

A novel single-step method was developed for the determination of 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at ultratrace levels in rainwater by on-line in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME) coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array-fluorescence detection. This paper is focused on a study of the IT-SPME coupling and optimization, its application to rainwater and other environmental waters and the stability of PAH rainwater solutions. In order to solve the different extractive behavior of PAHs, several IT-SPME parameters were optimized, with the type and percentage of organic modifier playing a decisive role. In the kinetic study on stability of PAH solutions, the organic modifier has proven to be effective as a preservative, avoiding the loss of the higher-molecular weight PAHs. The proposed method presents a wide interval of linearity (10-1500ngL(-1)) and a good relative standard deviation between 3.4% and 14.6% for the PAHs analyzed. Detection and quantification limits between 2.3 and 28ngL(-1) and 5.7 and 65ngL(-1) were obtained respectively, taking into account the values of the procedure blanks. Recoveries for different kinds of real water samples were within the range of 72-110%. Low and medium-molecular weight PAHs predominate in daily and monthly rainwater samples analyzed. In comparison with other methods reported, the proposed method achieves a significant reduction of the sample volume, the organic solvent consumption and time of sample treatment, allowing a cost-effective analysis of environmental waters. The method is especially suitable for samples from the precipitation events of low intensity or short duration for which sample volume is limiting.

4.
Anal Chim Acta ; 906: 41-57, 2016 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26772124

ABSTRACT

In-tube solid-phase microextraction (in-tube SPME or IT-SPME) is a sample preparation technique which has demonstrated over time its ability to couple with liquid chromatography (LC), as well as its advantages as a miniaturized technique. However, the in-tube SPME perspectives in the forthcoming years depend on solutions that can be brought to the environmental, industrial, food and biomedical analysis. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the strengths and weaknesses of this technique during the period 2009 to 2015 in order to identify research gaps that should be addressed in the future, as well as the tendencies that are meant to strengthen the technique. In terms of methodological aspects, this scoping review shows the in-tube SPME strengths in the coupling with LC (LC-mass spectrometry, capillary LC, ultra-high-pressure LC), in the new performances (magnetic IT-SPME and electrochemically controlled in-tube SPME) and in the wide range of development of coatings and capillaries. Concerning the applicability, most in-tube SPME studies (around 80%) carry out environmental and biomedical analyses, a lower number food analyses and few industrial analyses. Some promising studies in proteomics have been performed. The review makes a critical description of parameters used in the optimization of in-tube SPME methods, highlighting the importance of some of them (i.e. type of capillary coatings). Commercial capillaries in environmental analysis and laboratory-prepared capillaries in biomedical analysis have been employed with good results. The most consolidated configuration is in-valve mode, however the cycle mode configuration is frequently chosen for biomedical analysis. This scoping review revealed that some aspects such as the combination of in-tube SPME with other sample treatment techniques for the analysis of solid samples should be developed in depth in the near future.


Subject(s)
Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Chromatography, Liquid , Mass Spectrometry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...