Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder. Several drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as erenumab (an anti-CGRP receptor mAb), have been developed recently. However, the real-world effects of erenumab are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of erenumab for reducing migraine intensity and frequency in the real world. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2023. Studies estimating the real-world effect of erenumab on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6), number of days in medication (NDM), acute monthly intake (AMI), pain intensity (PI) and safety outcomes were included. Meta-analyses of proportions or mean differences were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were included. At 3-months, the effect was -7.18 days for MMD, -6.89 days for MHD, -6.97 for HIT-6, -6.22 days for NDM, -15.75 for AMI, and -1.71 for PI. Generally, the effect at 6- and 12-months increased slightly and gradually. The MMD/MHD response rates revealed that approximately one-third of patients exhibited a response greater than 30%, while one-sixth demonstrated a response exceeding 50%. Additionally, 3-4% of patients achieved a response rate of 100%. Adverse event rates were 0.34 and 0.43 at 6- and 12-months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in the real world; to our knowledge, this is the first real-world meta-analysis specific to erenumab. Erenumab represents a solid therapeutic option for physicians.

Dystrophin Genotype and Risk of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Dystrophinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dystrophinopathies are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders due to alterations in dystrophin/DMD expression. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to estimate the association of developmental disorders, autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder with the dystrophin/DMD genotype in population with dystrophinopathies. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were performed from inception to September 2022. We included observational studies in the population with Becker or Duchenne muscular dystrophies (BMD, DMD) that estimated the prevalence of these disorders according to Dp140 and/or Dp71 genotype. Meta-analysis of the prevalence ratio (PR) of genotype comparisons was conducted for each disorder. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the systematic review. In BMD, Dp140+ vs. Dp140- and Dp71+ vs. Dp71- were associated with developmental disorders with a PR of 0.11 (0.04, 0.34) and 0.22 (0.07, 0.67), respectively. In DMD, Dp140+/Dp71+ vs. Dp140- /Dp71- had a PR of 0.40 (0.28, 0.57), and Dp71+ vs. Dp71- had a PR of 0.47 (0.36, 0.63) for ADHD. However, there was no association of genotype with ASD, only a trend was observed for Dp71+ vs. Dp71-, with a PR of 0.61 (0.35, 1.06). Moreover, the data showed no association of these isoforms with emotional-related disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In BMD, Dp140 and Dp71 could be associated with developmental disorders, while ADHD might be associated with the Dp71 genotype in DMD. Further research is needed regarding Dp140 and Dp71, especially in DMD for ASD.

Epileptic disorders in Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dystrophin alterations in the brain have been associated with an increased risk of epilepsy in Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophies (BMD and DMD). Moreover, an association between the mutation site and the risk of epilepsy is not ruled out. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the prevalence of epilepsy in BMD and DMD populations and to establish a possible association between the site of mutation in the dystrophin gene and the risk of epilepsy. Systematic searches of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were conducted to identify relevant studies published from inception to January 2022. Observational studies of participants with BMD/DMD estimating the prevalence of epilepsy were included. The main outcome was the prevalence of epilepsy, and the secondary outcome was the prevalence ratio considering genotype. A random effects meta-analysis was performed for the prevalence of epilepsy. Eight studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The prevalence of epilepsy was 7% (95% CI 3-11%) in BMD, 5% (95% CI 2-8%) in DMD, and 5% (95% CI 3-7%) in the overall estimate. No association was observed between mutation site and the prevalence of epilepsy. BMD/DMD is strongly associated with the prevalence of epilepsy, with a higher prevalence in BMD/DMD populations than in the general population, probably owing to alterations in Dp427. The current evidence does not support the hypothesis that Dp140 or Dp71 affect epilepsy risk.

The Safety and Efficacy of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Monoclonal Antibodies for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Protocol for Multiple-Treatment Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder, associated with many medical comorbidities, highly prevalent, with complex treatment and management. Currently, monoclonal antibodies targeting the trigeminal sensory neuropeptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), are available. The aim of this protocol is to provide a review comparing the effects and safety profile of different monoclonal antibodies in migraine patients. METHODS: The literature search will be performed through the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Web of Science and Scopus databases, following the PICO strategy. Real World studies and randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of monoclonal antibodies against CGRP interventions (erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab) on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6) and triptan days of use (TriD) will be included. In Real World studies, the DerSimonian and Laird method will be used to calculate pooled estimates of the mean change difference and in randomized clinical trials, a network meta-analysis will be performed to estimate the comparative effects of different monoclonal antibodies against CGRP. RESULTS: The findings of this study will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide evidence to health professionals on the efficacy and safety of different monoclonal antibodies against CGRP on the outcomes studied.