Long-term outcome of pediatric renal transplantation with donors younger than 6 years.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is currently the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the use of kidneys from donors under 6 years of age as a possibility to increase the organ pool in pediatric recipients remains a controversial matter. We aimed to investigate whether donor age is associated to the long-term functionality of the renal graft. Likewise, we analyzed the adaptation of the graft to the ascending functional requirements in the pediatric patient. METHODS: Retrospective study of the results obtained in pediatric recipients transplanted with grafts from donors between 3 and 6 years of age, comparing them with those of grafts from donors older than 6 years. Among the variables compared are cumulative graft survival, renal size, need for antiproteinuric therapy, GFR, incidence of rejection, pyelonephritis, renal failure and surgical or tumor complications. RESULTS: A total of 43 transplants were performed with donors aged 3-6 years, and 42 transplants with donors older than 6 years. Cumulative graft survival at 5 years was 81% for the younger donor group compared to 98% for the older donor group (p < .05). At 8 years, cumulative graft survival for donors <6 years was 74%. As for the mean estimated graft survival, it was 11.52 years for the younger donor group and 14.51 years for older donors. During follow-up, the younger donor group presented greater renal enlargement and need for antiproteinuric therapy. The older donors group had a higher GFR during the first year of follow-up, which then equalized in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of acute or chronic rejection, acute pyelonephritis, acute renal failure or surgical or tumor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplants of grafts equal to or less than 6 years old have good short-term and acceptable long-term results in pediatric patients.

Clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunosuppressed children in Spain.

Limited information is available regarding SARS-CoV-2 infections in children with underlying diseases. A retrospective study of children less than 15 years old with primary or secondary immunosuppression infected with SARS-CoV-2 during March 2020 was performed. In this series, 8 immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 disease are reported, accounting for 15% of the positive cases detected in children in a reference hospital. The severity of the symptoms was mild-moderate in the majority with a predominance of febrile syndrome, with mild radiological involvement and in some cases with mild respiratory distress that required oxygen therapy. The rational and prudent management of these patients is discussed, evaluating possible treatments and options for hospitalization or outpatient follow-up.Conclusion: In our experience, monitoring of children with immunosuppression and COVID-19 disease can be performed as outpatients if close monitoring is possible. Hospitalization should be assessed when high fever, radiological involvement, and/or respiratory distress are present. What is Known: • SARS-CoV-2 infection is usually mild in children. What is New: • Outcome of immunosuppressed children with COVID-19 is generally good, with a mild-moderate course.

A case-control study to assess the role of polyomavirus in transplant complications: Where do we stand?

PURPOSE: The study's aim was to assess whether polyomavirus DNAemia screening was associated with different outcomes in patients with positive viremia compared with negative viremia. METHODS: Case-control retrospective study of patients with polyomavirus DNAemia (viremia > 1000 copies/mL) matched 1:1 with controls. Control group consists of the patient who received a transplant immediately before or after each identified case and did have nil viremia. FINDING: Ultimately, 120 cases of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) were detected and matched with 130 controls. Of these, 54 were adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), 43 were pediatric KTRs, and 23 were undergoing hemato-oncologic therapy, of which 20 were undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The odds ratio (OR) for overall risk of poorer outcomes in cases versus controls was 16.07 (95% CI: 5.55-46.54). The unfavorable outcome of switching the immunosuppressive drug (ISD) (14/40,35%) was no different from that of those treated with reduced ISD doses (31/71, 43.6%, P = .250). Acute rejection or graft-versus-host disease, previous transplant, and intensity of immunosuppression (4 ISDs plus induction or conditioning) were risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia (OR: 13.96, 95% CI: 11.25-15.18, P < .001; OR: 6.14, 95% CI: 3.91-8.80, P < .001; OR: 5.53, 95% CI: 3.37-7.30, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite viremia screening, dose reduction, and change in therapeutic protocol, patients with positive BKPyV-DNAemia present poorer outcomes and unfavorable results.

A novel SMARCAL1 missense mutation that affects splicing in a severely affected Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia patient.

Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia (SIOD) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by skeletal dysplasia, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, renal failure and immunodeficiency. In this work, we report the molecular studies undertaken in a severely affected SIOD patient that died at six years old due to nephropathy. The patient was screened for mutations using a targeted skeletal dysplasias panel. A homozygous novel missense mutation was identified, c.1615C > G (p.[Leu539Val]) that was predicted as mildly pathogenic by in silico pathogenicity prediction tools. However, splicing prediction software suggested that this variant may create a new splicing donor site in exon 9, which was subsequently confirmed using a minigene assay in HEK293 cells. Thus, the splicing alteration, c.1615C > G; r.1615c > g, 1615_1644del; (p.[Leu539_Ile548del]), results in the loss of 10 amino acids of the HARP-ATPase catalytic domain and the RPA-binding domain. Several studies have demonstrated a weak genotype-phenotype correlation among such patients. Thus, the molecular characterization has helped us to understand why a predicted weakly pathogenic missense mutation results in severe SIOD and should be considered in similar scenarios.

Limited sampling strategies for tacrolimus exposure (AUC0-24) prediction after Prograf(®) and Advagraf(®) administration in children and adolescents with liver or kidney transplants.

To develop limited sampling strategies (LSSs) to predict total tacrolimus exposure (AUC0-24 ) after the administration of Advagraf(®) and Prograf(®) (Astellas Pharma S.A, Madrid, Spain) to pediatric patients with stable liver or kidney transplants. Forty-one pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained after Prograf(®) and Advagraf(®) administration. LSSs predicting AUC0-24 were developed by linear regression using three extraction time points. Selection of the most accurate LSS was made based on the r(2) , mean error, and mean absolute error. All selected LSSs had higher correlation with AUC0-24 than the correlation found between C0 and AUC0-24 . Best LSS for Prograf(®) in liver transplants was C0_1.5_4 (r(2)  = 0.939) and for kidney transplants C0_1_3 (r(2)  = 0.925). For Advagraf(®) , the best LSS in liver transplants was C0_1_2.5 (r(2)  = 0.938) and for kidney transplants was C0_0.5_4 (r(2)  = 0.931). Excluding transplant type variable, the best LSS for Prograf(®) is C0-1-3 (r(2)  = 0.920) and the best LSS for Advagraf(®) was C0_0.5_4 (r(2)  = 0.926). Considering transplant type irrespective of the formulation used, the best LSS for liver transplants was C0_2_3 (r(2)  = 0.913) and for kidney transplants was C0_0.5_4 (r(2)  = 0.898). Best LSS, considering all data together, was C0_1_4 (r(2)  = 0.898). We developed several LSSs to predict AUC0-24 for tacrolimus in children and adolescents with kidney or liver transplants after Prograf(®) and/or Advagraf(®) treatment.

Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable paediatric renal transplant patients and 1-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The conversion from Prograf to Advagraf on a 1:1 (mg:mg) basis has been questioned in light of the publication of studies showing a decrease in tacrolimus blood concentrations after the administration of Advagraf. METHODS: The bioavailability of Prograf and Advagraf was evaluated in an open-label conversion study in 21 stable renal transplant paediatric patients. Serial blood samples for determining tacrolimus levels were collected during a 24-h period before (on Prograf) and after (on Advagraf) conversion. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental approach and the relative bioavailability calculated. Clinical and analytical data were obtained at 30, 90, 180 and 360 days after study enrolment. RESULTS: The mean ratio and 90 % confidence interval (CI) for peak plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and the area under the time-concentration curve during the first 24 h (AUC(0-24)) were 81.54 (95 % CI 71.6-92.87) and 87.19 (95 % CI 79.91-95.13), respectively. Renal glomerular filtration rate remained stable over the course of the follow-up. Two patients presented clinical events unrelated to tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels decreased in the first month, the dose/level ratio increased between months 1 and 6 and slight dose adjustments were required during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that Advagraf bioequivalence cannot be ensured in this population. Significant changes in tacrolimus levels and dose were observed on long-term follow-up.

Renal transplant outcome in children with an augmented bladder.

OBJECTIVE: Studies evaluating renal transplant (RT) outcome in children who underwent an augmentation cystoplasty (AC) are contradictory and the current knowledge is based on studies with a limited number of patients. The aim of this study is to compare RT outcome between children who underwent AC and those without augmentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20p who underwent an AC prior to the RT (12 with ureter and 8 with intestine) were enrolled in the study and were compared to a control group of 24p without AC, transplanted in the same time period (1991-2011). Data including; age at transplant, allograft source, urological complications, urinary tract infections (UTI) incidence, the presence of VUR, and patient and graft survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Mean age at RT and mean follow-up were 9.7 vs. 7.9 years and 6.9 vs. 7.9 years in the AC group and control group, respectively (NS). The graft originated in living donors for 60% of AC patients and 41.6% of the control RT patients. The rate of UTI were 0.01 UTI/patient/year and 0.004 UTI/patient/year in the augmented group and controls, respectively (p = 0.0001). In the AC group of 14p with UTIs, 10 (71%) had VUR and 5p out of 8 (62.5%) in the control group had VUR. In the AC group, of the 7p with ≥3 UTIs, 3 (43%) were non-compliant with CIC and the incidence of UTIs was not related with the type of AC or if the patient did CIC through a Mitrofanoff conduit or through the urethra. Graft function at the end of study was 92.9 ± 36.85 ml/min/m(2) in the AC group and 88.17 ± 28.2 ml/min/m(2) in the control group (NS). Graft survival at 10 years was also similar 88% in the AC group and 84.8% in controls. In the AC group 3p lost their grafts and 5 in the control group with respective mean follow-up of 10.6 ± 4.3 and 7.1 + 4.7 years. CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in the RT outcome between children transplanted with AC or without. However, recurrent UTIs are more frequent in the former group and these UTIs are related with non-compliance with CIC or the presence of VUR but, even so, UTIs will not lead to impaired graft function in most of the patients.