Analysis of satisfaction and surgical outcomes of a major ambulatory surgery program for penile implant. / Análisis de satisfacción y resultados quirúrgicos de un programa de cirugía mayor ambulatoria para el implante de prótesis de pene.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Penile prosthesis (PP) surgery is performed in many institutions as an inpatient procedure. We have recently initiated a major ambulatory surgery (MAS) program, thus reducing the hospital stay. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, complications and satisfaction of the implantation of outpatient surgery PP program in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study evaluating the results and satisfaction of PP implanted as an outpatient procedure in Bellvitge University Hospital during 2018. RESULTS: During 2018 we implanted 49 PP: 27 (55%) inpatient surgeries vs. 22 (45%) outpatient surgeries. Of these 22, 2 (9%) were second implants. All patients underwent both general anesthesia and crural, proximal dorsal nerve and transversus abdominis plane block (TAP). Complication rates between inpatient and outpatient procedures were similar, 2 (7%) and 1 (5%), respectively, without reporting infections or requiring PP removal. Postoperatively, a satisfaction telephone survey was conducted in 19 (86%) patients: 16 (84%) considered the time of hospital stay as appropriate, 15 (79%) would have preferred to be operated again in an outpatient care setting and 15 (79%) would recommend it. The patients' main concerns were related to being at home with no medical assistance at home and about coming back the next day for drainage removal. All patients reported well-controlled pain without requiring opioid intake in any case. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, PP implantation in an ambulatory care setting is feasible and safe. Although there are some aspects that should be improved, the program showed acceptable satisfaction rates and an adequate postoperative pain control, neither raising the administration of opioids, nor increasing complications and re-admission rates.

Comparative analysis of penile implants in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction versus postradical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Penile prosthesis is the treatment of choice for erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to medical treatment; vasculogenic ED and ED postradical prostatectomy (PRP) are the main aetiologies. Few studies have compared surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement for vasculogenic versus PRP severe erectile dysfunction. This study includes 117 cases corresponding to virgin implants for ED of either vasculogenic aetiology or PRP (58 for PRP and 59 for vasculogenic cases). We analysed data corresponding to: age, comorbidity, type of prosthesis, presence of fibrosis that hinders dilation, need for modelling, size of implanted cylinders and complications (intra and postoperative). In the results the rate of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and ischemic heart disease was higher in vasculogenic ED. All of the prostheses were hydraulic; 24.1% of two components and 75.9% of three in the PRP group; 39% components of two and 61% of three in the vasculogenic group. With regard to the presence of cavernous fibrosis and need for modelling, no significant differences were found. However, significant differences were observed in the size of the implanted cylinders; PRP of 18.30 ± 2.11 cm versus 19.21 ± 1.71 cm in vasculogenic ED (p = 0.01643). There were no significant differences between the groups in infection rates, mechanical failure or extrusion. In conclusion the implantation of penile prosthesis in ED after PRP is associated with a shorter cylinder length compared with vasculogenic origin. Although there was a certain non-significant tendency to the need for modelling manoeuvres in PRP, there were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes including infection or mechanical failure.

Nefrolitotomía percutánea bilateral simultánea: Eficacia y seguridad" / Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effectiveness and safety

Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de la nefrolitotomía percutánea bilateral simultánea realizada en pacientes afectados de litiasis renales bilaterales. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, período de septiembre de 2012 a noviembre de 2016. Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de litiasis renales bilaterales por TC abdominal. Técnica quirúrgica posición en prono, punción renal guiada por fluoroscopia y dilatación del tracto hasta 24Ch. Se revisaron las características demográficas y de las litiasis, la tasa libre de litiasis, el éxito clínico, las complicaciones y el seguimiento. Resultados: Durante el período de estudio, se realizaron 732 nefrolitotomías percutáneas. Dieciocho pacientes (36 unidades renales; 2,5%), 13 hombres y 5 mujeres con una mediana de edad de 58 años y un rango intercuartílico (RIC) de 40-66. Tamaño de la litiasis mediana de 228 mm2 (RIC 134-389), tiempo operativo mediana de 150 min (RIC 97-180) y una estancia hospitalaria mediana de 5 días (RIC 5-15). La tasa libre de litiasis fue del 80%. Se reportaron litiasis residuales en 8 unidades renales (22,2%) que requirieron técnicas complementarias para su completa resolución, 4 litotricias extracorpóreas por ondas de choque, una ureterolitotomía por laparotomía, 2 ureteroscopias y un segundo procedimiento. Complicaciones mayores incluyeron 4 hemorragias manejadas mediante embolización por angiografía. Mediana de seguimiento 36 meses (rango 26-46). Conclusiones: La nefrolitotomía percutánea bilateral simultánea es un procedimiento eficaz y seguro en pacientes afectados con cálculos renales bilaterales. Es un desafío quirúrgico que debe realizarse en pacientes seleccionados y en centros con experiencia

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. Materials and methods: This is a prospective study from September 2012 to November 2016. Patients diagnosed of bilateral kidney stones with abdominal CT scan were included. Surgical technique prone position, renal puncture guided by fluoroscopy and tract dilation up to 24Ch. We reviewed demographic and stone characteristics, stone free rate, clinical success, complications and follow-up. Results: During the study period, 732 percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed. Eighteen patients were included (36 renal units, 2.5%), 13 men and 5 women, with a median age of 58 years and an interquartile range (IQR) of 40-66. Median stone burden was 22 8mm2 (IQR 134-389); median operative time, 150 minutes (IQR 97-180); and median hospital stay, 5 days (IQR 5-15). Stone free rate was 80%. Residual calculi were encountered in 8 renal units (22.2%) and required other complementary techniques for their complete tesolution 4 external shockwave lithotripsies, one open ureterolithotomy, 2 ureteroscopies and one second look. Major complications included 4 cases of severe hemorrhage managed with angiographic embolization. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 26-46). Conclusions: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective and safe procedure in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. It is a surgical challenge that should be performed in selected patients and in centers with experience

Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effectiveness and safety. / Nefrolitotomía percutánea bilateral simultánea: Eficacia y seguridad".

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study from September 2012 to November 2016. Patients diagnosed of bilateral kidney stones with abdominal CT scan were included. Surgical technique prone position, renal puncture guided by fluoroscopy and tract dilation up to 24Ch. We reviewed demographic and stone characteristics, stone free rate, clinical success, complications and follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period, 732 percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed. Eighteen patients were included (36 renal units, 2.5%), 13 men and 5 women, with a median age of 58 years and an interquartile range (IQR) of 40-66. Median stone burden was 228mm2 (IQR 134-389); median operative time, 150minutes (IQR 97-180); and median hospital stay, 5 days (IQR 5-15). Stone free rate was 80%. Residual calculi were encountered in 8 renal units (22.2%) and required other complementary techniques for their complete tesolution 4 external shockwave lithotripsies, one open ureterolithotomy, 2 ureteroscopies and one second look. Major complications included 4 cases of severe hemorrhage managed with angiographic embolization. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 26-46). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective and safe procedure in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. It is a surgical challenge that should be performed in selected patients and in centers with experience.