Constipation: a potential cause of pelvic floor damage?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor damage is a major clinical problem usually attributed to obstetric injury. We speculated that constipation may also be an aetiological and preventable factor resulting from repeated stress on the perineum over many years, and this study aimed to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A total of 600 women attending a gynaecological clinic were assessed using a structured questionnaire gathering data on pelvic floor damage, constipation and obstetric trauma. Complete data were available on 596 subjects. KEY RESULTS: The prevalence of pelvic floor damage was 10% (61/596). In this group, constipation was identified in 31% (19/61) of women and obstetric trauma in 31% (19/61). In the group without pelvic floor damage, constipation was present in 16% (86/535) and obstetric trauma in 16% (83/535). In univariate analysis, pelvic floor damage was associated with age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03-1.08; P < 0.0001), constipation (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.31-4.26; P < 0.0001) and obstetric trauma (OR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.37-4.45; P < 0.0028). In multivariate analysis, the OR for age was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03-1.08; P < 0.0001), for constipation 2.35 (95% CI: 1.27-4.34; P < 0.0001) and for obstetric trauma 1.37 (95% CI: 0.72-2.62; P = 0.3398). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Constipation appears to be as important as obstetric trauma in the development of pelvic floor damage. Thus, a more proactive approach to recognizing and treating constipation might significantly reduce the prevalence of this distressing problem.

Persistent symptoms of functional outlet obstruction after rectocele repair.

BACKGROUND: Rectocele is frequently associated with constipation, but it is not known whether a causal relationship exists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of rectocele repair on symptoms of constipation. METHOD: Thirty-five women (28-79 years) consecutively operated for rectocele repair (11 transanal approach and 24 transperineal) were included in the prospective study. Using a structured questionnaire, the following criteria for constipation were evaluated: (a) straining, (b) sensation of anal blockage, (c) sensation of incomplete evacuation, (d) manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation, (e) stool consistency and (f) stool frequency. The evaluation was performed before and 1 year after rectocele repair. RESULTS: Before the operation all patients had two or more constipation criteria, including sensation of anal blockage. One year after the operation, the incidence of all symptoms significantly improved (from 3.9 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.3; P < 0.01). However, in 18 patients two or more criteria of constipation persisted, two patients presented one criterion, and only 15 patients became asymptomatic. Neither parity nor the type of surgical approach (endorectal vs transperineal) was related to the response to treatment. In eight patients who had a previous hysterectomy the result was significantly worse. CONCLUSION: In a considerable proportion of patients, constipation persists after rectocele repair, suggesting that these symptoms are related to an underlying dysfunction.

The puborectalis muscle.

The role of the levator ani and puborectalis muscle in preserving continence has been underestimated in the past, due predominantly to technical difficulties to investigate its proper function in healthy subjects, and its dysfunction as in patients with incontinence problems. This has recently been overcome by applying new investigational procedures such as a perineal dynamometer which measures the traction exerted by the levator ani on an intrarectal balloon catheter, or by multi-electrode arrays recording the generation of motor unit action potentials from various parts of the puborectalis muscle sling via intrarectal surface electrodes. Both techniques have the potential to provide new insights into the physiology of defecation and the pathophysiology of incontinence and constipation.

Innervation zones of the external anal sphincter in healthy male and female subjects. Preliminary results.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work was to investigate the distribution of the innervation zones of the motor units that make up the external anal sphincter (EAS) in healthy males and females. METHODS: A cylindrical probe carrying a circumferential array of 16 electrodes was used to detect the generation, propagation and extinction of individual motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) at 1, 2, and 3 cm depth from the orifice of the anal canal during maximal voluntary contractions of the EAS. Fifteen healthy males and 37 healthy nulliparous females were investigated. RESULTS: IZs could be detected in all males and in 34 out of 37 females. In the males, the IZs are scattered in the right and left hemisphincter at each of the three levels and their distribution is not affected by depth. In the females, the distribution is also concentrated in the right and left hemisphincter at depth 1 cm but is more uniform at depth 2 cm and more concentrated in the dorsal and ventral regions at depth 3 cm. ANOVA shows a statistically significant dependence of the IZ distribution on depth only in females and not in males. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that (a) IZs of the EAS can indeed be detected with a circumferential array placed at different depths along the anal canal; (b) large individual variability is observed, and (c) IZs show similar distribution at the three depth levels in males and different distributions in females.