Comparative assessment of prophylactic transfusions of platelet concentrates obtained by the PRP or buffy-coat methods, in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Whole blood-derived platelet concentrates can be obtained by the platelet-rich plasma (PRP-PCs) or the buffy-coat (BC-PCs) method. Few studies have shown that BC-PCs display lower in vitro platelet activation, but scarce information exists regarding transfusion efficacy. We have performed a retrospective study assessing platelet transfusion in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in our clinic, before and after the implementation of BC-PCs. METHODS: We reviewed clinical records corresponding to 70 PRP-PCs and 86 BC-PCs prophylactic transfusions, which were performed to 55 AHCT patients. Transfusion efficacy was assessed by the 24-h post-transfusion corrected count increment (24-h CCI) and bleeding events. Clinical factors affecting transfusion outcome were also investigated. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics and the total number of platelet transfusions were similar among groups. Mean donor exposure was 5.8 and 5.0 in each single PRP-PCs and BC-PCs transfusion, respectively (p < 0.01). The 24-h CCI was significantly higher in patients transfused with BC-PCs than in those receiving PRP-PCs (8.3[2.7-13.4] vs. 4.7[1.3-8.1]; p < 0.01). Independent predictors of poor platelet transfusion response included diagnosis other than acute leukemia (HR 8.30; 95% CI 1.96-35.22; p = 0.004), splenomegaly (HR 8.75; 95% CI 2.77-27.60; p < 0.001), graft versus host disease prophylaxis different from cyclosporine A and methotrexate (HR 3.96; 95% CI 1.55-10.14; p = 0.004) and PRP-PCs transfusion (HR 4.54; 95% CI 1.72-12.01; p = 0.002). There were no differences between both groups regarding the bleeding events. CONCLUSION: In the AHCT setting, we hypothesize that BC-PCs transfusion, when compared to PRP-PCs, results in higher CCI and reduced donor exposure, but provides no significant benefit regarding bleeding outcome.

Quality assessment and transfusion efficacy of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates washed with platelet additive solution.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of washed platelet concentrates (W-PC) is recommended for some patients, such as those who have had previous severe allergic transfusion reactions. However, we still lack a standardised method for preparing these products. Here, we assessed the effect of a manual washing procedure on in vitro platelet quality and on the transfusion efficacy of W-PCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Buffy coat-derived W-PC in Composol solution were prepared by one-step centrifugation. Platelet activation and function were evaluated before and after washing by means of: (i) CD62 expression by flow cytometry; (ii) platelet aggregation (LTA); and (iii) the VerifyNow® P2Y12 test. A pilot prospective transfusion study was carried out in 11 onco-hematology patients receiving, in a short time, two consecutive transfusions: one with standard PC (S-PC) and one with W-PC. The post-transfusion platelet increment, the 1 h and 24 h corrected count increment (CCI) and occurrence of bleeding events were used as indices of transfusion efficacy. RESULTS: Platelet recovery in W-PC was 84.8±5.4%. Washing slightly increased platelet activation in W-PC vs pre-washed samples (% CD62+ platelets 23.6±7 vs 14.8±1; p=0.03). As compared to prewash samples, platelet reactivity of W-PC as measured by VerifyNow® P2Y12 was significantly lower with ADP (PRU 32.2±37.7 vs 4.2±2.4, p=0.027), but similar using TRAP. Platelet aggregation responses to TRAP, collagen, ristocetin and arachidonic acid were maintained in W-PC. The pilot transfusion trial showed similar 1 h (13.5±5.6 vs 11.5±7.3, p=0.49) and 24 h (11±7.2 vs 9±6.5, p=0.48) CCI for S-PC and W-PC. Transfusion of W-PC was not associated with an increased number of bleeding events. DISCUSSION: We have set up a simple method to obtain buffy-coat-derived W-PC, which has minor effects on in vitro platelet quality and transfusion effectiveness. This procedure can be easily implemented in transfusion centres for on-demand preparation of washed platelets.

The role of bone marrow biopsy and FDG-PET/CT in identifying bone marrow infiltration in the initial diagnosis of high grade non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Accuracy in a multicenter series of 372 patients.

Bone marrow infiltration (BMI), categorized as an extra-nodal site, affects stage and is associated with poor prognosis in newly diagnosed lymphoma patients. We have evaluated the accuracy of PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) to assess BMI in 372 lymphoma patients [140 Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and 232 High Grade B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (HG B-NHL), among them 155 Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLCL)]. For HL cases, and taking into account PET/CT, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 96.7, 99.3, and 99.3% while those of BMB were 32.3, 83.8, and 85%, respectively. For HG B-NHL and considering PET/CT, sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy were 52.7, 81.7, and 84.1%, while those of BMB were 77.6, 90.2, and 90.7%, respectively. In the HG B-NHL group, 25 patients would have been under-staged without BMB. These results lead us to recommend PET/CT and the avoidance of BMB to assess BMI in HL. In the case of HG B-NHL, bone marrow status should be assessed firstly by means of PET/CT; only in either focal or diffuse PET/CT with low borderline SUV max values or in negative cases, should BMB be carried out afterwards. In the HG B-NHL setting and at the present moment, both techniques are complementary.