The surgical treatment of subaxial acute cervical spine facet dislocations in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adult cervical spine traumatic facet joint dislocations occur when excessive traumatic forces displace the vertebrae's facets, leading to loss of joint congruence. Reduction requires either cranial traction or open surgical procedures. This study aims to appraise the effects of different surgical techniques in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine acute traumatic facet blocks in adults. This study was based on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, registered in Prospero (CRD42021279249). The PICO question was composed of adults with acute cervical spine traumatic facet dislocations submitted to anterior or posterior surgical approaches, associated or not with cranial traction for reduction. Each surgical technique was compared to the other. The primary clinical outcomes included neurological improvement or worsening and surgical success/failure rates. The anterior approach without cranial traction was efficient in reducing facet displacements. Skull traction was an efficient and immediate method to achieve spine dislocation reductions. Differences were not present among techniques regarding neurological improvement. There were no surgical failures in patients operated on via the posterior approach. The need to decompress and stabilize the cervical spine can be achieved by anterior or posterior surgical approaches, and there is no clear answer as to which initial approach is superior to the other.

Single-Position Surgery versus Lateral-Then-Prone-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the outcomes of single-position (SP) circumferential lumbar interbody fusion in lateral decubitus versus dual-position (DP) fusion. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify comparative studies reporting the outcomes of SP lumbar interbody fusion versus DP. For risk of bias assessment, the ROBINS-I (risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions) tool was used. RESULTS: Four comparative studies were included from an initial search of 3780 papers. All 4 studies were retrospective cohort studies comparing outcomes of SP versus DP LLIF. A total of 349 patients were operated using SP versus 254 using DP. All studies involved reported operating time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, change in segmental lordosis, and complications. From a general perspective, baseline variables were similar in both groups in all the studies and all reported a significant decrease in operative time and length of stays with SP. CONCLUSIONS: Literature comparing SP versus lateral-then-prone lumbar fusion shows a tendency toward shorter operating time and hospital stays in SP lumbar fusion while maintaining similar perioperative outcomes.

Terminology and Legislation referring to Percutaneous Facet Procedures to Treat Low Back Pain in Brazil ­ Current Status

Incongruities in the terminology and in the Brazilian legislation about percutaneous facet procedures (PFPs) for the treatment of chronic lower back pain are frequently the subject of litigations between health professionals and supplementary healthcare providers. The Brazilian Hierarchical Classification of Medical Procedures (CBHPM, in the Portuguese acronym) describes four types of PFPs, while the Brazilian Unified Supplementary Health Terminology (TUSS, in the Portuguese acronym) describes five distinct lumbar PFPs, which correlate with the ones described on the List of Procedures and Events in Health, created by the Brazilian National Agency of Supplementary Health (ANS, in the Portuguese acronym). In the present paper, we review the terminology of the procedures, proposing the unification of the terminology and the abolition of redundancies in the tables. Finally, we developed a single terminology proposal for the PFPs based on their complexity and objectives to be used for the treatment of lower back pain.

Spinal Cord Injuries ­ When Is the Initial Tomography Insufficient?

Introduction Spinal cord injury (SCI) is common in polytrauma patients. The standard exam for the initial evaluation is computed tomography (CT), due to its higher sensitivity and specificity when compared with plain radiographs. However, CT is insufficient for themanagement of some cases, especially to evaluate ligamentous and spinal cord injuries. The objective of the present study is to describe clinical scenarios in which the CT scan was insufficient to guide the treatment of SCIs. Methods We present the cases of four polytrauma patients with normal CT scans at admission and with unstable or surgically-treated lesions. Discussion The cases reported evidence the need for ongoing neurological surveillance with serial physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cases of neurological injury not explained by CT or occult instability. Conclusion Computed tomography is not always sufficient to determine the management of SCIs. A comprehensive evaluation of the clinical data, CT findings and, occasionally, MRI findings is crucial in order to choose the best conduct.

Vertebral body chondrosarcoma with metastasis to the scalp.

We present a case of a 30-year-old man who had a 3-year history of low back pain. MRI demonstrated an infiltrative mass, affecting the vertebral body and pedicles of L4, with some extension to the vertebral canal. There was also tumor invasion in the inferior vena cava and in the left iliopsoas muscle. The anatomopathological examination of the resected L4 vertebral body was of a malignant neoplasia compatible with mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (high histological grade). About 2 months after surgery, he developed a progressive bladder incontinence, bilateral leg weakness and severe back pain. A new MRI was obtained, confirming progression of the disease. An occipital scalp lesion was detected and biopsy confirmed cutaneous metastasis. Primary malignant bone tumors are rare but should be ruled out in young patients with persistent low back pain. We present a case of a confirmed mesenchymal chondrosarcoma affecting lumbar spine, with MRI and pathological illustrations. Early diagnosis may improve the chances of local disease control and even cure.

Orthosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: A systematic review of prospective randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, conservative treatment of thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures without neurologic deficit has encompassed the application of an extension brace. However, their effectiveness on maintaining the alignment, preventing posttraumatic deformities, and improving back pain, disability and quality of life is doubtful. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether bracing patients who suffer TL fractures adds benefices to the conservative manage without bracing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant RCTs that compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of orthosis versus no-orthosis for TL burst fractures managed conservatively. Primary outcomes were: (1) Loss of kyphotic angle; (2) failure of conservative management requiring subsequent surgery; and (3) disability and pain outcomes. Secondary outcomes were defined by health-related quality of life and in-hospital stay. RESULTS: Based on predefined inclusion criteria, only two eligible high-quality RCTs with a total of 119 patients were included. No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding loss of kyphotic angle, pain outcome, or in-hospital stay. The pooled data showed higher scores in physical and mental domains of the Short-Form Health Survey 36 in the group treated without orthosis. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The current evidence suggests that orthosis could not be necessary when TL burst fractures without neurologic deficit are treated conservatively. However, due to limitations related with number and size of the included studies, more RCTs with high quality are desirable for making recommendations with more certainty.

Mielopatias agudas nÒo compressivas: [revisÒo] / Acute non-compressive myelopathy: [review]

Mielopatias agudas sÒo emergÛncias neurológicas. Por serem pouco comuns, muitas vezes há dificuldade no diagnóstico e atraso no início do tratamento destes pacientes. Através de revisÒo de literatura, descrevemos as características das principais causas de mielopatias nÒo compressivas: 1) mielopatias inflamatórias (doenþas desmielinizantes, auto-imunes e para-infecciosas); 2) pós radiaþÒo tardia, 3) por alteraþ§es vasculares e 4) por deficiÛncia de vitamina B12. Um algoritmo para auxílio na abordagem destes pacientes e posterior investigaþÒo etiológica é apresentado.(AU)

Mielopatias agudas não compressivas: [revisão] / Acute non-compressive myelopathy: [review]

Mielopatias agudas são emergências neurológicas. Por serem pouco comuns, muitas vezes há dificuldade no diagnóstico e atraso no início do tratamento destes pacientes. Através de revisão de literatura, descrevemos as características das principais causas de mielopatias não compressivas: 1) mielopatias inflamatórias (doenças desmielinizantes, auto-imunes e para-infecciosas); 2) pós radiação tardia, 3) por alterações vasculares e 4) por deficiência de vitamina B12. Um algoritmo para auxílio na abordagem destes pacientes e posterior investigação etiológica é apresentado.