Laboratory Value-Based Innovation in Heart Failure Improves Patient Health-Related Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: NT-proBNP is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with heart failure (HF). The concept of health-related outcomes as the primary endpoint for therapeutic intervention in chronic disease, such as HF, should be the focal point going forward. METHODS: We conducted a prospective real-world study in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. The main target was to evaluate the impact on patient's health-related outcomes of a personalized medical follow-up procedure, based on a laboratory model of risk stratification supported by NT-proBNP. One hundred and five consecutive patients admitted to the Hospital Heart-Failure unit were stratified into three groups (low, medium, and high risk) and prospective follow-ups during the 12 months post discharge. RESULTS: It was found that patients under this new approach experienced early and robust improvements in patient health-related outcomes with consistency in most domains which persisted beyond 12 months post follow-up. Improvements in health related quality of life score (HRQLS) was observed over the time of the study. After 6 months we found a significant improvement in HRQLS of 18.2% (from 76.5 ± 22.4 to 95.0 ± 15.7) and 14.4% (from 76.5 ± 22.4 to 96.3 ± 15.9) after 12 months of follow-up (p < 0.001). The highest improvements were found in the symptom severity domain where patients reported an improvement of 22.6% after 6 months and 18.9% after 12 months (p < 0.001). The lowest scores were reported in the physical domain with increase of 11.0% and 4.3% after 6 months and 12 months (p = 0.089). Psychosocial domain and the ability to carry out the activities of normal life showed improvement as well. CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy based on NT-proBNP optimizes HFrEF management and represents a major new approach for clinical laboratories to improve patient health-related outcomes in HFrEF.

[Update on interventional cardiology]. / Actualización en cardiología intervencionista.

This article contains a review of the most important studies on interventional cardiology reported in either publications or presentations. In the area of coronary interventions, ST-elevation myocardial infarction continues to take center place: recent studies have confirmed the importance of timely intervention and the safety of drug-eluting stents. The numerous studies that have compared different generations of drug-eluting stents indicate that there has been a steady improvement in safety and efficacy. In addition, the use of stents in the left main coronary artery and in multivessel disease have also been investigated in major studies. Of the different intracoronary diagnostic techniques, optical coherence tomography is highlighted by this review, particularly for its use in the study of drug-eluting stents. There is increasing interest in the percutaneous treatment of structural heart disease, specifically percutaneous aortic valve implantation, especially following the publication of the first randomized trial, which produced encouraging results.

High-risk diabetic patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: characteristics and medium-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization with drug-eluting stents.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents is an alternative for patients with high-risk unprotected left main coronary artery disease; those with diabetes mellitus are at even higher risk. Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention could lead to better results. The aim of this study was to evaluate medium-term results in a real-world sample of high-risk diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.From 3 tertiary hospitals, we retrospectively identified 334 high-risk patients, of whom 141 (42%) were diabetic and 193 (58%) were nondiabetic. The diabetes mellitus group showed a higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Angiographic and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly, with the exception of poor distal vessels in the diabetes mellitus group (44.5% vs 28.5%, P = 0.006). The use of intra-aortic balloon pumping and intravascular ultrasonography was low in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. After a median follow-up of 22.4 months, cardiac death was higher in the diabetes mellitus group (16.2% vs 7.5%, P = 0.015), especially in insulin-dependent diabetic patients (25.8%). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, target-lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction was similar in both groups (23.8% vs 18.3%, P = NS).High-risk diabetic patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease present with a worse clinical profile that carries a higher cardiac mortality rate in the medium term, especially in insulin-dependent diabetic patients.