Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cornea ; 41(12): 1568-1571, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36198619

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the diagnosis and management of bilateral blepharoconjunctivitis and erythema multiforme (EM)-like illness in an otherwise healthy young man who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2. METHODS: This is a case report of a 27 year-old man with a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 testing who presented with fever, eye redness, oral ulcerations, cough, sore throat, and progressive rash suspicious for EM-like illness. RESULTS: A SARS-CoV-2-positive patient presented to the emergency room with a progressing skin rash, bilateral conjunctivitis, and oropharyngeal mucosal ulcers. On initial ophthalmic examination, visual acuity was 20/25 both eyes (OU), and slit lamp examination demonstrated erythema and ulceration of the eyelid margins with fluorescein uptake at the mucocutaneous junction OU. The patient was admitted for observation and supportive treatment. During and after his hospital stay, he was treated with systemic and topical steroids, topical cyclosporine ophthalmic drops, erythromycin ophthalmic ointment, and artificial tears. At his 1-week follow-up visit after hospital discharge, the patient had complete resolution of his skin findings and improvement of his ocular and oral mucosal findings. Laboratory workup and imaging studies searching for other potential autoimmune and infectious etiologies showed negative results. CONCLUSIONS: Topical antiinflammatory drops, artificial tears, erythromycin ointment, and systemic steroids were an effective treatment for this bilateral blepharoconjunctivitis and EM-like presentation of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis , Erythema Multiforme , Exanthema , Male , Humans , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Lubricant Eye Drops , COVID-19 Testing , Ointments , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Erythema Multiforme/diagnosis , Erythema Multiforme/drug therapy , Erythema Multiforme/etiology , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis/etiology , Erythromycin
2.
Curr Eye Res ; 43(10): 1215-1220, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945490

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Aim: Corneal abrasions and nonhealing corneal epithelial defects are common conditions that cause pain and sometimes are slow to heal. Histatins, a family of histidine-rich peptides, have been implicated in oral and skin epithelial wound healing, and have been shown to be effective in vitro in human corneal epithelial cells. The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of histatin-1 on corneal epithelial wound healing in rabbits. MATERIALS & METHODS: Twenty-two (22) rabbits were separated into four treatment groups, each containing 3-7 rabbits. Treatments included three histatin-1 formulations (0.1 ug/ml. 1 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml) and one inactive vehicle, one drop given three times per day. Eight (8) mm circular wounds were created using 0.5 ml of 20% ethyl alcohol in the right eye of each rabbit. A masked observer photographed each eye twice daily using slit-lamp biomicrophotography. Wound area was analyzed by using ImageJ. Statistical analysis was conducted using Graphpad Prism. RESULTS: Wound recovery was faster in animals given 0.1 ug/ml, 1 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml when compared to the vehicle solution at 6, 24, and 30 hours after wound creation (p < 0.01). No adverse events were observed in any eyes. When analyzing area under the curve, % recovered area was higher overall in the 0.1 ug/ml (p < 0.01), 1 ug/ml (p < 0.01), and 10 ug/ml (p < 0.001) groups when compared to the vehicle solution. Hourly healing rate was also observed to be faster in the 0.1 ug/ml, 1 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml groups (p < 0.001) at 24 hours postinjury suggesting an accelerated healing process as compared to the vehicle group. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first in vivo experiment evaluating and confirming the efficacy of topical histatin on the corneal epithelium wound healing. Further studiesare warranted to better understand the mechanism and safety of topical histatin-1 in corneal epithelial wound-healing and its potential role for human disease treatment.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Epithelium, Corneal/drug effects , Eye Injuries/drug therapy , Histatins/pharmacology , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/drug therapy , Administration, Ophthalmic , Animals , Epithelium, Corneal/injuries , Eye Injuries/pathology , Histatins/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions , Rabbits , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/pathology
3.
Eye Contact Lens ; 44 Suppl 2: S196-S201, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29369232

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To survey ophthalmologists about current practice patterns regarding the evaluation of dry eye patients and referrals for a Sjogren syndrome (SS) workup. METHODS: An online survey was sent to ophthalmologists affiliated with the Scheie Eye Institute or Wills Eye Hospital using REDCap in August 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-four survey invitations were sent out and 101 (21%) ophthalmologists completed the survey. The common traditional dry eye test performed was corneal fluorescein staining (62%) and the most common newer dry eye test performed was tear osmolarity (18%). Half of respondents (51%) refer fewer than 5% of their dry eye patients for SS workups, with 18% reporting that they never refer any patients. The most common reasons for referrals included positive review of systems (60%), severe dry eye symptoms (51%) or ocular signs (47%), or dry eye that is refractory to treatment (42%). The majority (83%) felt that there is a need for an evidence-based standardized screening tool for dry eye patients to decide who should be referred for evaluation for SS. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists continue to prefer the use of traditional dry eye tests in practice, with the most common test being corneal fluorescein staining. There is an underreferral of dry eye patients for SS workups, which is contributing to the continued underdiagnosis of the disease. Most respondents felt that there was a need for an evidence-based standardized screening tool to decide which dry eye patients should be referred for SS evaluations.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/statistics & numerical data , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Ophthalmologists , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Sjogren's Syndrome/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Fluorescein/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Staining and Labeling/methods , Tears/physiology
4.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 9: 1137-45, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26170605

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the changes in dry eye disease (DED) severity and the percentage of cells expressing HLA-DR on the ocular surface following treatment with lubricant eyedrops containing polyethylene glycol and propylene glycol (PEG/PG) and the gelling agent hydroxypropyl guar (HP-Guar). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with DED used PEG/PG + HP-Guar eyedrops four times per day for 30 days. Assessments included DED severity (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], corneal staining, conjunctival staining, tear film break-up time [TFBUT], and Schirmer testing) and impression cytology of the conjunctiva with masked flow cytometry at baseline and at 30 days. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in corneal staining (P<0.01), OSDI (P=0.02), and TFBUT (P<0.01) following treatment with PEG/PG + HP-Guar. Results from flow cytometry revealed a significant decrease in cells expressing HLA-DR (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Treatment with PEG/PG + HP-Guar eyedrops showed improvement in dry eye severity and reduction in surface inflammation as indicated by a reduction in HLA-DR expression.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...