Multimodality Imaging of Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex multisystemic disease resulting from infection of the endocardium, the prosthetic valves, or an implantable cardiac electronic device. The clinical presentation of patients with IE varies, ranging from acute and rapidly progressive symptoms to a more chronic disease onset. Because of its severe morbidity and mortality rates, it is necessary for radiologists to maintain a high degree of suspicion in evaluation of patients for IE. Modified Duke criteria are used to classify cases as "definite IE," "possible IE," or "rejected IE." However, these criteria are limited in characterizing definite IE in clinical practice. The use of advanced imaging techniques such as cardiac CT and nuclear imaging has increased the accuracy of these criteria and has allowed possible IE to be reclassified as definite IE in up to 90% of cases. Cardiac CT may be the best choice when there is high clinical suspicion for IE that has not been confirmed with other imaging techniques, in cases of IE and perivalvular involvement, and for preoperative treatment planning or excluding concomitant coronary artery disease. Nuclear imaging may have a complementary role in prosthetic IE. The main imaging findings in IE are classified according to the site of involvement as valvular (eg, abnormal growths [ie, "vegetations"], leaflet perforations, or pseudoaneurysms), perivalvular (eg, pseudoaneurysms, abscesses, fistulas, or prosthetic dehiscence), or extracardiac embolic phenomena. The differential diagnosis of IE includes evaluation for thrombus, pannus, nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, Lambl excrescences, papillary fibroelastoma, and caseous necrosis of the mitral valve. The location of the lesion relative to the surface of the valve, the presence of a stalk, and calcification or enhancement at contrast-enhanced imaging may offer useful clues for their differentiation. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Management and outcomes of patients with left atrial appendage thrombus prior to percutaneous closure.

OBJECTIVE: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus has heretofore been considered a contraindication to percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC). Data regarding its management are very limited. The aim of this study was to analyse the medical and invasive treatment of patients referred for LAAC in the presence of LAA thrombus. METHODS: This multicentre observational registry included 126 consecutive patients referred for LAAC with LAA thrombus on preprocedural imaging. Treatment strategies included intensification of antithrombotic therapy (IAT) or direct LAAC. The primary and secondary endpoints were a composite of bleeding, stroke and death at 18 months, and procedural success, respectively. RESULTS: IAT was the preferred strategy in 57.9% of patients, with total thrombus resolution observed in 60.3% and 75.3% after initial and subsequent IAT, respectively. Bleeding complications and stroke during IAT occurred in 9.6% and 2.9%, respectively, compared with 3.8% bleeding and no embolic events in the direct LAAC group before the procedure. Procedural success was 90.5% (96.2% vs 86.3% in direct LAAC and IAT group, respectively, p=0.072), without cases of in-hospital thromboembolic complications. The primary endpoint occurred in 29.3% and device-related thrombosis was found in 12.8%, without significant difference according to treatment strategy. Bleeding complications at 18 months occurred in 22.5% vs 10.5% in the IAT and direct LAAC group, respectively (p=0.102). CONCLUSION: In the presence of LAA thrombus, IAT was the initial management strategy in half of our cohort, with initial thrombus resolution in 60% of these, but with a relatively high bleeding rate (~10%). Direct LAAC was feasible, with high procedural success and absence of periprocedural embolic complications. However, a high rate of device-related thrombosis was detected during follow-up.