The risk of second malignancies after 125I prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy in a single Australian institution.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence of second primary cancer (SPC) after 125I brachytherapy (BT) for early prostate cancer in an Australian institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All the patients in our cohort had a cystoscopy before the implant. Data were prospectively collected on all subsequent SPC diagnoses. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare data with the Australian population. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the actuarial second malignancy and pelvic malignancy rates and the death from SPC and from any cause. RESULTS: A total of 889 patients were followed up for a median of 4.16 (0-13) years with 370 (42%) patients having ≥5 years of followup. Sixty patients subsequently developed an SPC of which 11 were pelvic malignancies. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-3) and 3.3% (95% CI: 1-7) for any pelvic malignancy and 1% (95% CI: 0.4-2) and 2.6% (1-6) for bladder cancer, respectively. The SIR was significantly higher than expected for all bladder cancers at 2.9 (95% CI: 1-6) and close to significance (SIR, 3.0; 95% CI: 0.97-7) for bladder cancers within the first 5 years of followup in the subgroup analysis. On multivariate analysis, older age was associated with increased SPC risk and older age and positive smoking status were associated with increased overall mortality, mortality due to SPC, and mortality from second malignancy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There may be a small increased risk of bladder SPC after prostate BT. A tendency toward a higher risk of bladder SPC after BT was found within the first 5 years of followup probably reflecting screening bias.

Hemiablative Focal Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy: A Phase II Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The objective of focal brachytherapy (BT) is to provide effective prostate cancer control for low-risk disease but with reduced genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual side effects in a cost-effective way. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe a phase II study examining technical and dosimetric feasibility and toxicity, quality of life changes, and local control with post-treatment biopsy outcomes in men with early stage low volume prostate cancer treated with focal iodine-125 seed BT. METHODS: The study design is a prospective, multicenter trial with a planned sample size of 20 patients including men with a minimum age of 60 years, a life expectancy estimated to be greater than 10 years, with low or low-tier intermediate risk prostate cancer, unilateral disease on the biopsy, and a Gleason score of ≤3+4 and <25% cores involved. The investigations specific for the study are multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) baseline, at 20 and 36 months to rule out high grade disease and a transperineal mapping biopsy (baseline and at 36 months) for more accurate patient selection. The hemigland region will receive 144 Gy. Standard normal tissue constraints will be considered as for a whole gland (WG) implant. Dosimetric parameters will be evaluated at day 30 after the implant. Toxicity and quality of life will be evaluated with international validated questionnaires focusing on urinary, rectal, sexual domain, and general health-related quality of life. The patients will complete this assessment at baseline and then approximately every 6 months after the implant up to 10 years. RESULTS: To date, one patient is involved in the trial. He underwent the pre-implant investigations which found bilateral disease. Therefore, a standard seed implant was performed. If the results from this trial provide evidence that the treatment is safe, feasible, and improves toxicity, funding will be sought to conduct a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT). CONCLUSIONS: This protocol is designed to show feasibility in delivering hemigland focal therapy with seed BT. It may answer crucial questions and obtain data which will enable downstream decisions on focal low dose rate (LDR) prostate BT. CLINICALTRIAL: Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02643511; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02643511 (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ghLCzIhY).

The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

AIM: This manuscript reviews the English language literature on the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies, focusing on the treatment cervical cancer. BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy plays a key role in both definitive and adjuvant treatment of these patients, although efforts continue to minimize acute and chronic toxicity. IMRT is an attractive option because of the potential to dose escalate to the target while sparing organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The English language literature was reviewed for relevant studies. RESULTS: Multiple heterogeneous studies have showed dosimetric and clinical benefits with reduction in acute and late gastrointestinal, genitourinary and hematologic toxicity, especially in the post hysterectomy scenario and for dose escalation to para-aortic nodes. Consensus is evolving regarding necessary margins and target delineation in the context of organ movement and tumor shrinkage during the course of radiotherapy. Protocols with daily soft-tissue visualization are being investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Consistency in approach and reporting are vital in order to acquire the data to justify the considerable increased expense of IMRT.