Posttranslational modifications affect the interaction of S100 proteins with tumor suppressor p53.

Proteins of the S100 family bind to the intrinsically disordered transactivation domain (TAD; residues 1-57) and C-terminus (residues 293-393) of the tumor suppressor p53. Both regions provide sites that are subject to posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation and acetylation, that can alter the affinity for interacting proteins such as p300 and MDM2. Here, we found that S100A1, S100A2, S100A4, S100A6, and S100B bound to two subdomains of the TAD (TAD1 and TAD2). Both subdomains were mandatory for high-affinity binding to S100 proteins. Phosphorylation of Ser and Thr residues increased the affinity for the p53 TAD. Conversely, acetylation and phosphorylation of the C-terminus of p53 decreased the affinity for S100A2 and S100B. In contrast, we found that nitrosylation of S100B caused a minor increase in binding to the p53 C-terminus, whereas binding to the TAD remained unaffected. As activation of p53 is usually accompanied by phosphorylation and acetylation at several sites, our results suggest that a shift in binding from the C-terminus in favor of the N-terminus occurs upon the modification of p53. We propose that binding to the p53 TAD might be involved in the stimulation of p53 activity by S100 proteins.

Modulation of the oligomerization state of p53 by differential binding of proteins of the S100 family to p53 monomers and tetramers.

We investigated the ways S100B, S100A1, S100A2, S100A4, and S100A6 bind to the different oligomeric forms of the tumor suppressor p53 in vitro, using analytical ultracentrifugation and multiangle light scattering. It is established that members of the S100 protein family bind to the tetramerization domain (residues 325-355) of p53 when it is uncovered in the monomer, and so binding can disrupt the tetramer. We found a stoichiometry of one dimer of S100 bound to a monomer of p53. We discovered that some S100 proteins could also bind to the tetramer. S100B bound the tetramer and also disrupted the dimer by binding monomeric p53. S100A2 bound monomeric p53 as well as tetrameric, whereas S100A1 only bound monomeric p53. S100A6 bound more tightly to tetrameric than to monomeric p53. We also identified an additional binding site for S100 proteins in the transactivation domain (1-57) of p53. Based on our results and published observations in vivo, we propose a model for the binding of S100 proteins to p53 that can explain both activation and inhibition of p53-mediated transcription. Depending on the concentration of p53 and the member of the S100 family, binding can alter the balance between monomer and tetramer in either direction.