Maintenance of Vision Needed to Drive after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and visual acuity (VA)/driving vision maintenance over 4 years in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, clinical practice cohort study using data from the Vestrum Health database. PARTICIPANTS: Initial diagnosis (January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019) of nAMD or DME and ≥ 1 year of treatment/follow-up history. The VA analysis required 4 years of treatment/follow-up history. For the driving vision maintenance analysis, patients required Snellen VA of 20/40 or better at baseline and for ≥ 6 months during year 1 after index intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in the better-seeing eye. METHODS: A loss-of-driving event was the first clinic visit with VA worse than 20/40 sustained for ≥ 6 consecutive months. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated the probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years stratified by year-1 injection number. Cox proportional hazard models examined associations between baseline clinical characteristics and year-1 injection frequency and the risk of losing driving vision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in VA over time and by baseline VA, driving vision maintenance probability over time and stratified by anti-VEGF injection frequency, and baseline factors predictive of driving vision maintenance. RESULTS: In year 1, the nAMD and DME cohorts gained 8.5 and 9.5 ETDRS letters, respectively. Between years 1 and 4, patients with nAMD and DME lost 6.6 and 2.7 ETDRS letters, respectively. The probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years was 56% (nAMD) and 72% (DME); among patients who received 1 to 5, 6 to 7, and ≥ 8 anti-VEGF injections in year 1, corresponding probabilities were 50%, 56%, and 65% (nAMD; P < 0.001) and 63%, 72%, and 77% (DME; P < 0.001). Baseline factors associated with driving vision loss included older age, worse index VA, geographic atrophy (nAMD), and worsening baseline diabetic retinopathy (DME). CONCLUSIONS: Older age and worse index VA were risk factors for driving vision loss, whereas a greater year-1 injection number was associated with driving vision maintenance through year 4, supporting early initiation and frequent anti-VEGF injections for maintaining driving vision in nAMD or DME. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

REGIONAL POPULATION MOBILITY AND OUTPATIENT RETINA VISITS IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

PURPOSE: To characterize how community mobility patterns across the United States correlate with local changes in retina visits during the pandemic. METHODS: Outpatient retina clinic visits were linked to population mobility by combining multiple public data sets, including the Google Community Mobility Reports and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Infection. Percentage change from baseline in daily-average number of retina visits by county and mobility were measured by county. RESULTS: A total of 2,159,689 patient visits were examined across 332 counties. Daily-average retina visits decreased by 7.0%, 19.0%, 5.0%, and 4.0% from Quarter 1 to 4 of 2020. This decrease was negatively correlated with increased incident of COVID-19 deaths for Quarters 1 to 3 (r = -0.13, r = -0.16, and r = -0.15, respectively, P < 0.001) and increased incident cases for Quarters 1 and 2 (r = -0.18, r = -0.13, respectively, P < 0.001). Daily-average retina visits relative to baseline were significantly lower for metropolitan counties in Quarters 1 and 2, compared with urban and rural (P < 0.001). The decline in retina visits had greatest association with decline in workplace visits in Quarters 1 to 3 (r = 0.27, r = 0.09, r = 0.12, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into how regional mobility patterns may help to explain and predict patient behaviors and retina outpatient visit responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Incidence of Retinal Artery and Vein Occlusions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine whether new cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) increased during the coronavirus 209 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients visiting retina clinics with a new diagnosis in two time periods: between January 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020 (the pre-COVID-19 period), and between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 (the COVID-19 period). The key outcome was the percentage of newly diagnosed central RAO (CRAO), branch RAO (BRAO), central RVO (CRVO), and branch RVO (BRVO) seen in each period. RESULTS: The study population included 285,759 new patients in the pre-COVID-19 period and 156,427 new patients in the COVID-19 period. The overall number of new patients dropped dramatically during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic (24%, 66%, and 51% less new patients in March, April, and May 2020 than in the same months in 2019; P < .0001 for all 3 months). However, the decrease in the number of newly diagnosed patients with CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO during these months was less dramatic. As most states reopened in June and the number of patients in retina clinics started to increase, the newly diagnosed patients with these conditions as a percentage of all new diagnoses returned to similar trends as seen in the pre-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of new cases of RAO and RVO with respect to all new diagnoses in retina clinics remained stable for the majority of the COVID-19 period. There was an increase in these percentages during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO, which may have led to the presumption that more patients presented with these conditions during the COVID-19 period evaluated in this study. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:22-30.