Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
FASEB J ; 20(10): 1622-34, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16873885

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is a malignancy whose dependence on estrogen exposure has long been recognized even though the mechanisms whereby estrogens cause cancer are not clearly understood. This work was performed to determine whether 17beta-estradiol (E2), the predominant circulating ovarian steroid, is carcinogenic in human breast epithelial cells and whether nonreceptor mechanisms are involved in the initiation of breast cancer. For this purpose, the effect of four 24 h alternate periods of 70 nM E2 treatment of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) negative MCF-10F cell line on the in vitro expression of neoplastic transformation was evaluated. E2 treatment induced the expression of anchorage-independent growth, loss of ductulogenesis in collagen, invasiveness in Matrigel, and loss of 9p11-13. Only invasive cells that exhibited a 4p15.3-16 deletion were tumorigenic. Tumors were poorly differentiated ER-alpha and progesterone receptor-negative adenocarcinomas that expressed keratins, EMA, and E-cadherin. Tumors and tumor-derived cell lines exhibited loss of chromosome 4, deletions in chromosomes 3p12.3-13, 8p11.1-21, 9p21-qter, and 18q, and gains in 1p, and 5q15-qter. The induction of complete transformation of MCF-10F cells in vitro confirms the carcinogenicity of E2, supporting the concept that this hormone could act as an initiator of breast cancer in women. This model provides a unique system for understanding the genomic changes that intervene for leading normal cells to tumorigenesis and for testing the functional role of specific genomic events taking place during neoplastic transformation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/chemically induced , Estradiol/adverse effects , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Line , Chromosome Aberrations , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Estrogen Receptor alpha/deficiency , Female , Humans , Receptors, Progesterone/deficiency
2.
Front Biosci ; 11: 151-72, 2006 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16146722

ABSTRACT

The breast attains its maximum development during pregnancy and lactation. After menopause the breast regresses in both nulliparous and parous women containing lobular structures that have been designated lobules type 1. Despite the similarity in the lobular composition of the breast at menopause, the fact that nulliparous women are at higher risk of developing breast cancer than parous women, indicates that Lobules type 1 in these two groups of women might be biologically different, or exhibit different susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Based on these observations it was postulated that the Lobule type 1 found in the breast of nulliparous women and of parous women with breast cancer never went through the process of differentiation, retaining a high concentration of epithelial cells that are targets for carcinogens and therefore susceptible to undergo neoplastic transformation, these cell are called Stem cells 1, whereas Lobules type 1 structures found in the breast of early parous postmenopausal women free of mammary pathology, on the other hand, are composed of an epithelial cell population that is refractory to transformation called Stem cells 2. It was further postulated that the degree of differentiation acquired through early pregnancy has changed the "genomic signature" that differentiates the Lobule type 1 from the early parous women from that of the nulliparous women by shifting the Stem cell 1 to a Stem cell 2 that is refractory to carcinogenesis, making this the postulated mechanism of protection conferred by early full term pregnancy. The identification of a putative breast stem cell (Stem cell 1) has reached in the last decade a significant impulse and several markers also reported for other tissues have been found in the mammary epithelial cells of both rodents and humans. Although still more work needs to be done in order to better understand the role of the Stem cell 2 and its interaction with the genes that confer it a specific signature, collectively, the data presently available provides evidence that pregnancy, through the process of cell differentiation, shifts the Stem cell 1 to Stem cell 2, cells that exhibit a specific genomic signature that could be responsible for the refractoriness of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis.


Subject(s)
Mammary Glands, Animal/pathology , Mammary Glands, Human/pathology , Neoplasms/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/biosynthesis , Estrogen Receptor beta/biosynthesis , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Models, Biological , Pregnancy , RNA , Rats , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...