Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Eur Radiol ; 24(10): 2590-6, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25007869

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the capabilities of standard pelvic MRI with low-resolution pelvic MRI using fast breath-hold sequences to evaluate deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive women with suspected DIE were studied with pelvic MRI. A double-acquisition protocol was carried out in each case. High-resolution (HR)-MRI consisted of axial, sagittal, and coronal TSE T2W images, axial TSE T1W, and axial THRIVE. Low-resolution (LR)-MRI was acquired using fast single shot (SSH) T2 and T1 images. Two radiologists with 10 and 2 years of experience reviewed HR and LR images in two separate sessions. The presence of endometriotic lesions of the uterosacral ligament (USL), rectovaginal septum (RVS), pouch of Douglas (POD), and rectal wall was noted. The accuracies of LR-MRI and HR-MRI were compared with the laparoscopic and histopathological findings. RESULTS: Average acquisition times were 24 minutes for HR-MRI and 7 minutes for LR-MRI. The more experienced radiologist achieved higher accuracy with both HR-MRI and LR-MRI. The values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy did not significantly change between HR and LR images or interobserver agreement for all of the considered anatomic sites. CONCLUSIONS: LR-MRI performs as well as HR-MRI and is a valuable tool for the detection of deep endometriosis extension. KEY POINTS: • High- and low-resolution MRI perform similarly in deep endometriosis evaluation • Low-resolution MRI significantly reduces the duration of the examination • Radiologist experience is fundamental for evaluating deep pelvic endometriosis.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/diagnosis , Female Urogenital Diseases/diagnosis , Image Enhancement , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pelvis/pathology , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Ann Hematol ; 93(9): 1559-64, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24760400

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) performed by modified coaxial technique as an alternative tool to surgical biopsy in patients with refractory or recurrent lymphomas. Between May 2005 and May 2012, 57 CT-guided CNB of deep lesions were performed in patients with a previous diagnosis of lymphoma and suspected for refractory or recurrent disease. A modified coaxial technique was used in all cases and multiple samples were obtained for histological and immunohistochemical studies. A diagnosis of lymphoma with specification of subtype according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification was established in 30/57 cases (52.6 %). The previous diagnosis of lymphoma was confirmed in 27/57 patients (47.4 %), whereas histological progression in 3/57 (5.3 %) and other malignant neoplasms in 17/57 (29.8 %) were found. Lymphoma without subtype specification was diagnosed in 6/57 (10.5 %), and no conclusive diagnosis could be established in 4/57 cases (7 %). Overall diagnostic accuracy was 82.5 %. In patients with a final diagnosis of malignant lymphoma, accuracy was 75 %. No complications occurred. Percutaneous CT-guided CNB is a safe, effective and reliable tool in the management of patients with refractory or recurrent lymphomas without superficial lymphadenopathy and can be considered as alternative to surgical sampling.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Failure
5.
Recenti Prog Med ; 103(11): 493-9, 2012 Nov.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23096738

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important diagnostic tools for evaluating gastrointestinal disorders. A rigorous examination protocol is needed to achieve the best results. This paper describes the technical issues of CT and MRI for the study of gastrointestinal tracts (esophagus, stomach, small and large bowel).


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...