Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(12): 3529-3533, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36088190

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the willingness of Family Medicine residents to engage in SDM, before and after an educational intervention. METHODS: We delivered a lecture and a workshop for residents on implementing SDM in preventive health care. Before the lecture (T1), participants completed a measure of their willingness to engage in SDM. Six months later, participants completed the measure a second time (T2). RESULTS: At T1, 64 of 73 residents who attended the educational session completed incorpoRATE. Six months later, 44 of 64 participants completed the measure a second time (T2). The range of incorpoRATE sum scores at T1 was from 4.9 to 9.1 out of 10. Among the 44 participants who completed incorpoRATE at both time points, the mean scores were 7.0 ± 1.0 at T1 and 7.4 ± 1.0 at T2 (t = -2.833, p = 0.007, Cohen's D = 0.43). CONCLUSION: Among Family Medicine residents, the willingness to engage in SDM is highly variable. This suggests a lack of consensus in the mind of these residents about SDM. Although mean scores at T2 were significantly higher, we question the educational importance of this change. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: incorpoRATE is a promising measure for educators. Understanding how willing a particular physician audience is to undertake SDM, and which elements require attention, could be helpful in designing more targeted curricula. Further research is needed to understand how the perceived stakes of a clinical situation influence physician willingness to engage in SDM.


Subject(s)
Decision Making, Shared , Physicians , Humans , Family Practice , Patient Participation , Curriculum , Decision Making
2.
Pain ; 39(1): 17-22, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2812851

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) depends upon the patient's appropriate response to a strong aversive stimulus (i.e., pain) with subsequent reinforcement (i.e., opiate injection). Each patient may have psychological characteristics that modify this response to aversive stimuli. To test for such characteristics, 76 female patients undergoing abdominal gynecologic procedures were given psychological tests (i.e., the Chance External, Powerful Others External, and Internal subscales of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control; the Activities of Daily Living scale; and the Hypochondriasis, Depression, and Hysteria scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory). Patients utilized PCA for postoperative analgesia. At the completion of PCA, patients were given a questionnaire assessing both the level of pain and degree of satisfaction with pain relief. Correlational analysis compared the level of pain and degree of satisfaction with results of psychological testing. Results showed that female patients with an external locus of control had higher levels of pain and greater dissatisfaction with PCA. An internal locus of control was predictive of lower pain scores and increased satisfaction. PCA effectiveness, as measured by the level of pain and degree of patient satisfaction, correlated with results of psychological testing. The delineation of these and other possible modifiers of PCA efficacy may define populations that are optimally responsive to PCA.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Internal-External Control , Self Administration , Analgesics/adverse effects , Consumer Behavior , Female , Humans , Narcotics/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement , Patients/psychology , Psychological Tests , Regression Analysis
3.
Pain ; 39(1): 23-29, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2812852

ABSTRACT

Fifty-eight gynecologic surgical patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) were given several psychological questionnaires and their pain was monitored postoperatively. Pain scores were recorded hourly on postoperative day 1. In addition, patients were asked to score retrospectively their overall pain experience while using PCA (Patient Overall Evaluation). Patients having had a history of pain for at least 6 months were considered to have 'chronic pain,' while those who had no history of chronic pain were grouped as 'acute pain' patients. Chronic pain patients spent more time in 'moderate' pain than did acute pain patients. While patients with a history of chronic pain had higher scores on the hourly pain scale compared to acute pain patients, there were no differences between the two groups on the Patient Overall Evaluation. In addition, chronic pain patients reported the same pain levels after completion of PCA as they did during its use, in contrast to acute pain patients whose retrospective pain levels were higher than during PCA use. Compared to acute pain patients, chronic pain patients had higher scores on both the Hypochondriasis and the Hysteria scales of the MMPI. A history of chronic pain may affect the use of patient-controlled analgesia since chronic pain patients may accommodate to a 'moderate' pain level which approximates their preoperative perception of pain. By contrast, acute pain patients who have no 'chronic pain experience' may self-administer pain medication so as to attain a predominately 'mild' level of pain.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Pain/drug therapy , Self Administration , Acute Disease , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Pain/physiopathology , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement , Patients/psychology , Psychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...