Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Male , Prevalence , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with acute asthma who require intensive care, using a clinical score.METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 299 patients who were admitted to the hospital for acute asthma, between 1993 and 1996. Two groups were selected: group I (GI) with 26 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit; group II (GII) with 52 patients admitted to the Emergency Room, matched by age and sex with those of GI. A clinical score to assess the groups had the following items: heart rate, respiratory rate, retractions, cyanosis, alertness level, previous treatment, previous hospitalization, and duration of attack. The score ranged from 0 to 2 points for each of those, summing up 11 points.RESULTS: The clinical parameters that discriminated well the 2 groups were: retractions (p<0.001), cyanosis (p<0.01) and alertness level (p<0.005). Through a discriminate analysis of the clinical score components, 22/26 patients were recognized as GI and 40/52 patients were recognized as GII, showing an accuracy of 85% and 77% respectively for GI and GII.CONCLUSION: The clinical score was useful to discriminate patients with severe attack of asthma who might require intensive care, and should be employed at hospital admission.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To verify the prevalence of asthma in schoolchildren from Curitiba.METHOD: A written questionnaire of asthma symptoms (ISAAC-International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood) was applied to children ages 6-7 years and adolescents 13-14 years registered in 32 public schools.RESULTS: 3,200 questionnaires were applied to 13-14 year-old adolescents, and 2,863 questionnaires to 6-7 year-old children. The questionnaire should be answered by the parents of 6-7 year-old children (group I) and by the adolescents themselves (13-14 year-old, group II). The rate of questionnaires returned was 58% for group I and 92% for group II. A presumptive diagnosis of asthma was based on having had 4 or more attacks of wheezing in the last 12 months, or 1-3 wheezing episodes in addition to night awakening for wheezing, nocturnal cough and wheezing after exercise. Under these criteria there were 15.7% asthmatics in group I and 11.6% in group II. Symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis were found in 38% and 36%, and eczema in 11% and 10% for groups I and II, respectively. Among those with presumed asthma, over 70% denied having had asthma. The question "have you ever had asthma" although specific is not sensitive enough.CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asthma in Curitiba was 15.7% for children 6-7 years old and 11.6% for adolescents 13-14 years. The question "have you ever had asthma" did not contribute to defining cases with asthma.
ABSTRACT
Immediate skin test reactions are the hallmark of atopic diseases. EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics) is a local anesthetic that reduces the pain and apprehension for skin testing. We studied EMLA effects on the skin prick test with allergen and histamine. Reactions were evaluated by means of wheal and flare crossed diameters, speed of reaction and local temperature changes. One hour occlusion dressing with EMLA significantly delayed the beginning of reaction with antigen (129%) and histamine (101%). It decreased wheal diameter (33% and 15%) as well as local temperature variation (55% and 80%) respectively with antigen and histamine. Local anesthesia with EMLA probably interferes with histamine action and reduces the immediate skin test reaction. Therefore, it should not be used to reduce the pain of allergy skin testing.
