ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Single-stage augmentation mastopexy (SAM) is a common procedure, but revision rates are high. Muscle slings have been used in SAM, but despite satisfactory outcomes, most studies do not include objective or accurate measurements of implant/breast position. This article describes a surgical technique for SAM employing a composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS). OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess outcomes from primary SAM procedures utilizing the CRIMS technique in a cohort of patients operated on by a single surgeon. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (60 breasts) aged a mean of 43.1â ±â 6.8 years underwent primary CRIMS mastopexy to treat severe ptosis (grade III-IV) in 25 patients (78.1%). The average implant volume was 255 cc (range, 215-335 cc). Three-dimensional imaging obtained from the Divina scanner system was employed to evaluate lower pole stretch and lower pole arc and to determine long-term ptosis. RESULTS: Four cases of complications were observed in 3 patients (9.3%), minor dehiscence in 2 and capsular contraction in 1, during a mean follow-up of 42 months. The value for lower pole stretch was 5.5% (P < 0.0001) between 10 days and 1 year, with the majority occurring early in the first 6 months, indicating that lower pole arc remained steady during the last months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in techniques have led to improvements in aesthetic outcomes following SAM, and CRIMS can play a helpful role. Our results show this procedure is suitable for patients with breast ptosis, with acceptable complication rates and the added bonus of implant stabilization within the pocket.
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Surgical Flaps , Adult , Cohort Studies , Esthetics , Humans , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Muscles , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the role of age in the risk of postoperative complications in patients submitted to unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy, with emphasis on total reconstruction loss. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective study of patients submitted to breast reconstruction, whose variables included: oncological and reconstruction data, postoperative complications, including loss of reconstruction and complications of surgical wound. We divided the patients into two groups, according to the classification of the Brazilian National Elderly Policy and the Statute of the Elderly: young (age <60 years) and elderly (60 years or more). We also grouped them according to the World Health Organization classification: young people (age <44 years), middle age (45-59 years); elderly (age 60-89 years) and extreme advanced age (90 years or older). We applied the surgical risk classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists to investigate the role of the preoperative physical state as a possible predictor of complications. RESULTS: of the 560 patients operated on, 94 (16.8%) were 60 years of age or older. We observed a local complication rate of 49.8%, the majority being self-limited. The incidences of necrosis, infection and dehiscence were 15.5%, 10.9% and 9.3%, respectively. Patients older than 60 years presented a chance of complication 1.606 times greater than the younger ones. Forty-five (8%) patients had loss of the reconstruction; there was no statistically significant difference in the mean age of the patients who presented this result or not (p=0.321). CONCLUSION: in selected patients, breast reconstruction can be considered safe; most documented complications were limited and could be treated conservatively.
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the role of age in the risk of postoperative complications in patients submitted to unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy, with emphasis on total reconstruction loss. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study of patients submitted to breast reconstruction, whose variables included: oncological and reconstruction data, postoperative complications, including loss of reconstruction and complications of surgical wound. We divided the patients into two groups, according to the classification of the Brazilian National Elderly Policy and the Statute of the Elderly: young (age <60 years) and elderly (60 years or more). We also grouped them according to the World Health Organization classification: young people (age <44 years), middle age (45-59 years); elderly (age 60-89 years) and extreme advanced age (90 years or older). We applied the surgical risk classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists to investigate the role of the preoperative physical state as a possible predictor of complications. Results: of the 560 patients operated on, 94 (16.8%) were 60 years of age or older. We observed a local complication rate of 49.8%, the majority being self-limited. The incidences of necrosis, infection and dehiscence were 15.5%, 10.9% and 9.3%, respectively. Patients older than 60 years presented a chance of complication 1.606 times greater than the younger ones. Forty-five (8%) patients had loss of the reconstruction; there was no statistically significant difference in the mean age of the patients who presented this result or not (p=0.321). Conclusion: in selected patients, breast reconstruction can be considered safe; most documented complications were limited and could be treated conservatively.
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar o papel da idade no risco de complicações pós-operatórias de pacientes submetidas à reconstrução mamária unilateral pós-mastectomia, com ênfase na perda total da reconstrução. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo de pacientes submetidas à reconstrução mamária, cujas variáveis incluídas foram: dados oncológicos e da técnica de reconstrução, complicações pós-operatórias, incluindo perda da reconstrução e complicações da ferida operatória. As pacientes foram divididas de acordo com a classificação da Política Nacional do Idoso e Estatuto do Idoso em dois grupos: jovens (idade <60 anos) e idosas (60 anos ou mais). Também foram agrupadas de acordo com a classificação da Organização Mundial da Saúde: jovens (idade <44 anos); meia-idade (idade 45-59 anos); idosas (idade 60-89 anos) e velhice extrema (90 anos ou mais). A classificação do risco cirúrgico da Sociedade Americana de Anestesiologistas foi aplicada para investigar o papel do estado físico pré-operatório como possível preditor de complicações. Resultados: das 560 pacientes operadas, 94 (16,8%) apresentavam 60 anos ou mais. Observou-se taxa de complicações locais de 49,8%, a maioria, limitadas. As incidências de necrose, infecção e deiscência foram de 15,5%, 10,9% e 9,3%, respectivamente. Pacientes com 60 anos ou mais apresentaram chance de complicação 1,606 vezes maior do que as jovens. Quarenta e cinco (8%) pacientes apresentaram perda da reconstrução e não houve diferença estatisticamente significante na média de idade das pacientes que apresentaram ou não esse desfecho (p=0,321). Conclusão: em pacientes selecionadas, a reconstrução mamária pode ser considerada segura; a maioria das complicações documentadas foi limitada e pode ser tratada conservadoramente.
