ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, such as third and fourth-generation, are responsible for emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in neonatal units. Furthermore, antimicrobial daily doses are not standardized in neonatology. This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of antimicrobial broad spectrum to bacterial sensitivity profile in a referral unit of neonatal progressive care. METHODS: This is a cohort study conducted in a referral neonatal progressive care unit from January 2008 to December 2016. The data of all hospitalized neonates was collected daily. The infection criteria used were the standardized national criteria, based on definitions of Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. In this study, the use of antimicrobials was evaluated as antimicrobial-day (ATM-day) and the ratio of multidrug-resistant microorganisms per 1000 ATM-day of broad spectrum was also calculated. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (ETIC 312/08 e CAAE 58973616.2.0000.5149). RESULTS: From 2008 to 2016, 2751 neonates were hospitalized, corresponding to 60,656 patient-days. The ratio of multidrug-resistant microorganisms per 1000 ATM-day of broad spectrum was 1,3 in the first period and 4,3 in the second period (p=0,005). CONCLUSION: It was observed that use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, especially those with coverage for Gram-negative bacteria, was associated with an increase of multidrug-resistant bacteria.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Bacterial Infections , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Delivery of Health Care , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
Catheter-drawn blood sampling is an efficient method of diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in neonates; it has greater sensitivity and accuracy than methods using catheter-tip cultures. No association was detected between catheter-drawn blood sampling and the occurrence of adverse events with central venous catheters.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Sepsis , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Blood Specimen Collection , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Sepsis/diagnosisABSTRACT
We found that low birth weight and type of central venous catheter were associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates. In the multivariate analysis, only central venous catheter type (dissected veins, tunneled catheters, and short-term nontunneled catheters) remained significantly associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Neonatal sepsis is the most frequent health care-associated infection in neonatal units. This study aimed to analyze articles on the clinical usefulness of catheter-drawn blood samples and catheter tip cultures for the diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in neonates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed for studies published from 1987-2017, without language restriction. Observational studies carried out in neonates with CRBSI diagnosed using catheter-drawn blood samples or catheter tip cultures were included. RESULTS: A total of 412 articles were identified in the databases and 10 articles were included. The 7 studies that evaluated central venous catheter tip cultures and cultures of catheter fragments presented sensitivities ranging from 58.5%-100% and specificities ranging from 60%-95.7%. Three studies that evaluated catheter-drawn blood cultures, paired with peripheral blood cultures, reported sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 71% when evaluated for the differential time to positivity. When quantitative evaluation was performed, the sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 99.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies analyzed cultures from the central venous catheter tip and catheter fragments for the diagnosis of CRBSI in neonatal populations. The results of this review suggest that the analysis of the catheter-drawn blood samples and catheter tip cultures, paired with peripheral blood cultures, are efficient methods for the diagnosis of CRBSI in neonates.
Subject(s)
Blood Specimen Collection , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to assess the use of the Brazilian criteria for reporting of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in the neonatal unit and compare them with the criteria proposed by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). METHODS: this was a cross-sectional study conducted from 2009 to 2011. It included neonates with HAI reporting by at least one of the criteria. Statistical analysis included calculation of incidence density of HAIs, distribution by weight, and by reporting criterion. Analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the national criteria was performed considering the NHSN as the gold standard, with agreement assessed by kappa. RESULTS: a total of 882 newborns were followed, and 330 had at least one infection notified by at least one of the criteria. A total of 522 HAIs were reported, regardless of the criteria. An incidence density of 27.28 infections per 1,000 patient-days was observed, and the main topographies were sepsis (58.3%), candidiasis (15.1%), and conjunctivitis (6.5%). A total of 489 (93.7%) were notified by both criteria, eight infections were notified only by the national criteria (six cases of necrotizing enterocolitis and two cases of conjunctivitis), and 25 cases of clinical sepsis were reported by NHSN criteria only. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95.1%, 98.6%, 98.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, for all topographies, and were 91.8%, 100%, 100%, and 96.3% for the analysis of sepsis. Kappa analysis showed an agreement of 96.9%. CONCLUSION: there was a high rate of agreement between the criteria. The use of the national criteria facilitates the reporting of sepsis in newborns, and can help to improve the specificity and PPV. .
OBJETIVO: avaliar a aplicação dos critérios nacionais para notificação de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde (IRAS) em Unidade Neonatal e comparar com os critérios propostos pelo National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). MÉTODOS: estudo transversal realizado de 2009 a 2011. Forma incluídos os neonatos que apresentaram notificação de IRAS por pelo menos um dos critérios. Análise estatística incluiu cálculo de densidade de incidência de IRAS e distribuição por peso e por critério de notificação. Foi realizada análise da sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo (VPP) e valor preditivo negativo (VPN) para os critérios nacionais, considerando o NHSN como padrão-ouro e a concordância avaliada pelo Kappa. RESULTADOS: foram acompanhados 882 neonatos, e 330 apresentaram pelo menos uma infecção notificada por, no mínimo, um dos critérios. Foram notificadas 522 IRAS, independentemente do critério. Observou-se densidade de incidência de 27,28 infecções por 1.000 pacientes-dia, e as principais topografias foram sepse (58,3%), monilíase (15,1%) e conjuntivite (6,5%). Um total de 489 (93,7%) notificações foram por ambos os critérios; oito infecções foram notificadas apenas pelo critério nacional (duas conjuntivites e seis enterocolites necrosantes); e 25 casos de sepse clínica foram notificadas apenas pelo NHSN. A sensibilidade, especificidade, VPP e VPN foram de 95,1%, 98,6%, 98,4%, 95,7%, respectivamente, para todas as topografias, e para análise de sepse foram 91,8%, 100%, 100% e 96,3%. O Kappa revelou concordância de 96,9%. CONCLUSÃO: verificou-se uma elevada concordância entre os critérios. A utilização dos critérios nacionais facilita a n...
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Infection Control/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Sepsis/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Incidence , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to assess the use of the Brazilian criteria for reporting of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in the neonatal unit and compare them with the criteria proposed by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). METHODS: this was a cross-sectional study conducted from 2009 to 2011. It included neonates with HAI reporting by at least one of the criteria. Statistical analysis included calculation of incidence density of HAIs, distribution by weight, and by reporting criterion. Analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the national criteria was performed considering the NHSN as the gold standard, with agreement assessed by kappa. RESULTS: a total of 882 newborns were followed, and 330 had at least one infection notified by at least one of the criteria. A total of 522 HAIs were reported, regardless of the criteria. An incidence density of 27.28 infections per 1,000 patient-days was observed, and the main topographies were sepsis (58.3%), candidiasis (15.1%), and conjunctivitis (6.5%). A total of 489 (93.7%) were notified by both criteria, eight infections were notified only by the national criteria (six cases of necrotizing enterocolitis and two cases of conjunctivitis), and 25 cases of clinical sepsis were reported by NHSN criteria only. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95.1%, 98.6%, 98.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, for all topographies, and were 91.8%, 100%, 100%, and 96.3% for the analysis of sepsis. Kappa analysis showed an agreement of 96.9%. CONCLUSION: there was a high rate of agreement between the criteria. The use of the national criteria facilitates the reporting of sepsis in newborns, and can help to improve the specificity and PPV.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Infection Control/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Sepsis/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
O presente relato aborda o planejamento e as ações tomadas pelo Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais para o enfrentamento e controle da pandemia pelo vírus Influenza A subtipo H1N1, ocorrida entre os meses de março e abril de 2009. São descritos os fluxos de pessoas, as precauções estabelecidas no atendimento doscasos suspeitos ou confirmados, a evolução para gravidade desses pacientes, a mortalidade associada e o destino dos resíduos gerados no atendimento.
The present report addresses the planning and actions taken by the Hospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais to confront and control the Influenza A virus subtype H1N1 pandemia, which occurred between the months of March and April 2009. We describe patient triage, the precautions established in the care of suspected or confirmed cases, the evolution of these patients, the associated mortality and the destination of the waste generated in care.
