Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(4): e12919, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29797676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of mTOR inhibitors is associated with lower incidence of CMV infections but its effect on viral load has not been investigated. AIMS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included data from 273 CMV seropositive kidney transplant recipients randomized to receive anti-thymocyte globulin and everolimus (rAGT/TAC/EVR, n = 81), basiliximab and everolimus (BAS/TAC/EVR, n = 97) or basiliximab and mycophenolate (BAS/TAC/MPS, n = 95). All patients received tacrolimus (TAC) and corticosteroids. Preemptive CMV therapy based on weekly pp65 antigenemia test was used during the first 6 months. Blinded weekly CMV DNAemia was compared among the groups. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with undetectable CMV DNAemia (23.4% vs 56.7% vs 22.1%, P < .001) was higher in the BAS/TAC/EVR. The median number of study visits with positive CMV DNAemia (2.0 vs 0.0 vs 4.6, rATG/EVR vs BAS/MPS, P = .354; BAS/EVR vs BAS/MPS, P < .0001; rATG/EVR vs BAS/EVR, P < .001) were lower in the BAS/TAC/EVR. The proportion of patients with positive CMV DNAemia who were not treat for CMV infection/disease based on pp65 antigenemia was higher in rATG/TAC/EVR group (74.1% vs 36.1% vs 44.2%, P < .001) but mean CMV DNAemia was comparable to BAS/TAC/EVR and lower than BAS/TAC/MPS (8536 ± 15 899 vs 7975 ± 17 935 vs 16 965 ± 37 694 copies/mL, P < .05), respectively. The proportion of patients with CMV DNAemia below 5000 copies/mL was higher in patients receiving EVR (74.1% vs 83.5% vs 50.0%, P = .000), respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These data suggest that mTOR inhibitors reduce the incidence of CMV infection by limiting CMV viral replication.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/pharmacology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Everolimus/pharmacology , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Viral Load/drug effects , Adult , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus/drug effects , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus/physiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/blood , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Serologic Tests , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Treatment Outcome , Virus Replication/drug effects
2.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 14: 108-115, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29254534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Modern immunosuppressive regimens, although associated with improved 1-year graft survival, are associated with adverse effects, including opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus after transplantation, cardiovascular complications, and de novo malignancies. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term (12 months) cost-effectiveness of everolimus (EVR) versus mycophenolate sodium (MPS) in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction therapy, tacrolimus, prednisone, and no prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection. METHODS: A Markov state transition model was designed. Data from a single-center prospective trial were used along with data from the center's medical bills database. The target population comprised adults with low immunological risk submitted to first ABO-compatible transplantation with kidneys recovered from living or deceased donors. The time horizon was 12 months. The interventions included tacrolimus and prednisone plus a single 3-mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and EVR or basiliximab (BAS) and EVR or BAS and MPS. The clinical outcomes considered for this analysis were cytomegalovirus infection/disease, acute rejection, graft dysfunction, surgical complications, graft loss, and life-years gained. RESULTS: ATG/EVR was cost-saving compared with BAS/MPS on all evaluated outcomes; BAS/EVR outperformed BAS/MPS on most of the evaluated outcomes. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MPS, EVR is an alternative immunosuppressive agent that is able to provide resource-saving to the health care provider with effectiveness gains for the patient.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Animals , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Graft Rejection , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Mycophenolic Acid/economics , Prospective Studies , Rabbits
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...