ABSTRACT
Background: Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for the administration of a higher biologically effective doses (BED), that would be essential to achieve durable tumor control. Escalating treatment doses need a very accurate tumor positioning and motion control during radiotherapy.The aim of this study to assess the feasibility and safety of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) dose-escalated protocol at 45 Gy, 50 Gy and 55 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions, in Border Line Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRCP) /Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) by means of a standard LINAC platform. Methods: Patients diagnosed of BRPC/LAPC, candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT, in four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas (Canary Islands, Spain) were included in this prospective study. Radiotherapy was administered using standard technology (LINACS) with advanced positioning (Lipiodol® and metallic stent used as fiducial markers) and tumor motion control (4D, DBH, Calypso®). There were 3 planned dose-escalated SIB groups, 45 Gy/5f (9 patients) 50 Gy/5f (9 + 9 patients) and 55 Gy/5f (9 patients). The defined primary end points of the study were the safety and feasibility of the proposed treatment protocol. Secondary endpoints included radiological tumor response after SBRT, local control and survival. Results: From June 2017 to December 2022, sixty-two patients were initially assessed for eligibility in the study in the four participating centers, and 49 were candidates for chemotherapy (CHT). Forty-one were referred to radiotherapy after CHT and 33 finally were treated by escalated-dose SIB, 45 Gy (9 patients) 50 Gy (16 patients), 55 Gy(8 patients). All patients completed the scheduled treatment and no acute or late severe (≥grade3) gastrointestinal toxicity was observed.Local response was analyzed by CT/MRI two months after the end of SBRT. Ten patients (31,25 %) achieved objective response (2/9:45 Gy, 5/15:50 Gy, 3/8:55 Gy). Follow-up was closed as July 2023. Freedom from local progression at 1-2y were 89,3% (95 %CI:83,4-95,2%) and 66 % (95 %CI:54,6-77,4%) respectively. The 1-2y survival rates were 95,7% (95 %CI:91,4-100 % and 48,6% (95 %CI:37,7-59,5%) respectively. Conclusion: These promising results should be confirmed by further studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up period.
ABSTRACT
Background/purpose: The aim of this study is to assess for the first time the immediate and long term impact on quality-of-life of HBO treatments(HBOT) at 1.45 ATA (Absolute Atmospheric Pressure) Medical Hyperbaric chamber. Methods: Patients over 18 years-old, suffering of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 radiation induced late toxicity and progressing to standard support therapy were included in this prospective study. HBOT was given daily, sixty minutes per session by a Medical Hyperbaric Chamber Biobarica System at 1.45 ATA at 100% O2. Forty sessions were prescribed for all patients given in 8 weeks. Patients reported outcomes (PROs) was assessed by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, before starting, in the last week of the treatment, as well as during follow up. Results: Between February-2018/June-2021, 48 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 37 patients (77%) completed the treatment prescribed HBOT sessions. Patients with anal fibrosis (9/37) and brain necrosis (7/37) were the most frequently treated. The most common symptoms were pain (65%) and bleeding (54%). In addition, thirty out of the 37 patients who completed the pre- and post-treatment Patients Reported Outcomes (PROs) assessment also completed the follow up European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30), and were evaluated in the present study. Mean follow up was 22,10 (6-39) months.The Median score of the EORTC-QLQ-C30, at the end of HBOT and during follow-up, was improved in all assessed domains, except in the cognitive aspect (p = 0.106). Conclusions: HBOT at 1.45 ATA is a feasible and well tolerated treatment, improving long term quality of life in terms of physical function, daily activities and general health subjective state of patients suffering severe late radiation-induced toxicity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Definitive radiotherapy is an effective single-modality in T1 glottic cancer. Hypofractionated schemes could offer excellent results in a shorter treatment period. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity comparing conventional vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment in T1N0M0-glottic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between Jan-1st, 2005 and August-1st, 2017, in a prospective cohort study, with 10-year follow-up, 138 patients were treated with conventional schedule 2 Gy/day, total dose 70 Gy/7 weeks (N = 71) or hypofractionated schedule 2, 2-2, 25 Gy/day, total dose 63, 8-63 Gy/5, 5 weeks (N = 67). Endpoints were clinical-response rate, local relapse-free survival (LRFS), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), toxicity rates, relapse-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), second tumour-free survival (2TFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All patients showed a complete clinical response. No differences were found for LRFS (p = 0.869), LFS (p = 0.975), RFS (p = 0.767), MFS (p = 0.601), 2TFS (p = 0.293), or OS (p = 0.685). Acute toxicity for skin and mucosae was similar (p = 0.550 and p = 0.698). Acute laryngeal toxicity was higher in the hypofractionation group (p = 0.004), due to an increase in slight moderate grade. No differences in late laryngeal edema were found (p = 0.989). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy offers high rate survival, local control, and larynx preservation after 5-10-year follow-up. A hypofractionation could be preferable, since it offers the same results as conventional with fewer treatment sessions.
